Le présent article expose une analyse narrative des publications portant sur la responsabilisation clinique et s'appuie notamment sur l'expérience de l'Angleterre dans la mise sur pied d'une « gouvernance clinique » pour évaluer le cadre de responsabilisation clinique des services oncologiques en Ontario. D'après cette analyse, la gouvernance clinique et les approches de responsabilisation qui fusionnent les démarches cliniques et administratives à l'échelon local et systémique sont plus susceptibles d'être efficaces dans leurs efforts pour améliorer la qualité des soins.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RomanowRJ. Building on Values: The Future of Health Care in Canada. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, 2002.
2.
KirbyMJLLeBretonM. The health of Canadians — The federal role (volume six: Recommendations for reform). Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Government of Canada, 2002.
3.
GagnonDMenardM. Listening for direction: National consultation on health services and policy issues. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, 2001.
4.
DaultMLomasJBarerM. Listening for direction II: National consultation on health services and policy issues for 2004–2007. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, 2004.
5.
Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Listening for direction III: Preliminary research themes areas. [Accessed March 31, 2008]. Available from: http://www.chsrf.ca
6.
FooksCMasloveL. Rhetoric, fallacy or dream? Examining the accountability of Canadian health care to citizens. Canadian Policy Research Networks, 2004.
7.
LoughlinM. On the buzzword approach to policy formulation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2002; 8(2): 229–42.
8.
SullivanTFloodCM. Chrétien's prescription for medicare: A green poultice in lieu of accountability. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2004; 170(3): 359–60.
9.
MaysNPopeCPopayJ. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 2005; 10(Suppl 1): 6–20.
10.
ShortellSMWatersTMClarkeKWBBudettiPP. Physicians as double agents: Maintaining trust in an era of multiple accountabilities. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1998; 280: 1102–8.
11.
DegelingP. Reconsidering clinical accountability. An examination of some dilemmas inherent in efforts to bolster clinician accountability. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 2000; 15(1): 3–16.
12.
DeleonL. Accountability in a ‘reinvented’ government. Public Administration, 1998; 76(3): 539–58.
13.
EmanuelEJEmanuelLL. What is accountability in health care?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1996; 124(2): 229–39.
14.
BuetowSElwynG. The window mirror: A new model of the patient-physician relationship. Open Medicine, 2008; 2(1).
15.
DuboisCADenisJL. Accountability in Canadian health care systems: Fitting the pieces of the puzzle together. In: DaviesHTOTavakoliM, editors. Health care policy, performance and finance: Strategic issues in health care management. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2004.
16.
ArrowK. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. The American Economic Review, 1963; 53(5): 941–73.
17.
TuohyCH. Agency, contract, and governance: Shifting shapes of accountability in the health care arena. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2003; 28(2–3): 195–216.
18.
Doctors in society: Medical professionalism in a changing world. Report of a working party. Royal College of Physicians of London, 2005.
19.
Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st Century. Institute of Medicine, 2001.
20.
MillensonML. The silence. Health Affairs, 2003; 22(2): 103–12.
21.
EmanuelEJEmanuelLL. Preserving community in health care. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1997; 22(1): 147–84.
22.
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.First ever common benchmarks will allow Canadians to measure progress in reducing wait times (press release). [Accessed May 1, 2008]. Available from: http://www.health.gov.on.ca
23.
RiesNMCaulfieldT. Accountability in healthcare and legal approaches. Canadian Policy Research Networks, 2004.
24.
FloodCMSullivanT. Supreme disagreement: The highest court affirms an empty right. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2005; 173(2): 142–3.
25.
MelloMMStuddertDMBrennanTA. The Leapfrog Standards: Ready to jump from marketplace to courtroom?Health Affairs, 2003; 22(2): 46–59.
26.
FiguerasJRobinsonRJakubowskiE. Purchasing to improve health systems performance: Drawing the lessons. In: FiguerasJRobinsonRJakubowskiE, editors. European observatory on health systems and policies series: Purchasing to improve health systems performance. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press, 2005.
27.
BirkmeyerNJOBirkmeyerJD. Strategies for improving surgical quality — Should payers reward excellence or effort?New England Journal of Medicine, 2006; 354(8): 864–70.
28.
DohertyRB. Politics calls for a compromise in tactics, not principles. [Accessed May 1, 2008]. Available from: http://www.acponline.org/.
29.
DudleyRA. Pay-for-performance research: How to learn what clinicians and policy makers need to know. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2005; 294: 1821–3.
30.
AbelsonJGauvinFP. Engaging citizens: One route to health care accountability. Canadian Policy Research Networks, 2004.
31.
Department of Health. The new NHS: Modern, dependable. London, UK: The Stationery Office, 1997.
32.
Department of Health. A first class service: Quality in the new NHS. London, UK: Crown Copyright, 1998.
33.
WalsheKFreemanTLathamLWallaceLSpurgeonP. Clinical governance: From policy to practice. Birmingham, UK: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, 2000.
34.
PringleM. Clinical governance in primary care: Participating inclinical governance. British Medical Journal, 2000; 321(7263): 737–40.
35.
RosenR. Clinical governance in primary care: Improving quality in the changing world of primary care. British Medical Journal, 2000; 321(7260): 551–4.
36.
HalliganADonaldsonL. Implementing clinical governance: Turning vision into reality. British Medical Journal, 2001; 322: 1413–7.
37.
HuntingtonJGillamSRosenR. Clinical governance in primary care: Organisational development for clinical governance. British Medical Journal, 2000; 321(7262): 679–82.
38.
DegelingPJMaxwellSIedemaRHunterDJ. Making clinical governance work. British Medical Journal, 2004; 329(7467): 679–81.
39.
DeighanMCullenRMooreR. The development of integrated governance. London, UK: The NHS Confederation, 2004.
40.
DegelingPMaxwellSKennedyJCoyleB. Medicine, management, and modernisation: A “danse macabre?”British Medical Journal, 2003; 26: 649–52.
41.
MalcolmLMaysN. New Zealand's independent practitioner associations: A working model of clinical governance in primary care?British Medical Journal, 1999; 319(7221): 1340–2.
42.
Audit Commission. Early lessons from payment by results. London, UK: Author, 2005.
43.
Policy and Strategy Directorate, Department of Health. Health reform in England: Update and commissioning framework. London, UK: Department of Health, 2006.
44.
ShekelleP. New contract for general practitioners. British Medical Journal, 2003; 326(7387): 457–458.
45.
National Health Service. The future of the CGST. [Accessed March 31, 2008]. Available from: http://www.cgsupport.nhs.uk/.
46.
ThomasM. The evidence base for clinical governance. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2002; 8(2): 251–4.
47.
DegelingP. Realising the development potential of clinical governance. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2006; 44(6): 688–91.
48.
TuohyCH. Dynamics of a changing health sphere: The United States, Britain, and Canada. Health Affairs1999; 18(3): 114–34.
49.
BlendonRJSchoenCDesRochesCOsbornRZapertK. Common concerns amid diverse systems: Health care experiences in five countries. Health Affairs, 2003; 22(3): 106–21.
50.
SullivanTDobrowMJSchneiderENewcomerLRichardsMWilkinsonL. Améliorer la responsabilité cliniques et performance en cancérologie [Improving clinical accountability and performance in the cancer field]. Pratiques et Organisation des Soins, 2008; 39(3): 207–15.
51.
Cancer Services Implementation Committee. Report of the Cancer Services Implementation Committee. Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2001.
52.
ThompsonLJMartinMT. Integration of cancer services in Ontario: The story of getting it done. Healthcare Quarterly, 2004; 7(3): 42–8.
53.
SullivanTDobrowMThompsonLHudsonA. Reconstructing cancer services in Ontario. HealthcarePapers, 2004; 5(1): 69–80.
54.
GreenbergAAngusHSullivanTBrownAD. Development of a set of strategy-based system-level cancer care performance indicators in Ontario, Canada. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2005; 17(2): 107–14.
55.
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Local Health System Integration Act; 2006. [Accessed May 1, 2008]. Available from: http://www.health.gov.on.ca
56.
Cancer Care Ontario. IM/IT strategic plan 2008–2011. [Accessed May 1, 2008]. Available from: http://www.cancercare.on.ca
57.
WrightFCDe VitoCLangerBHunterA. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: A systematic review and development of practice standards. European Journal of Cancer, 2007; 43(6): 1002–10.
58.
SundaresanSLangerBOliverTSchwartzFBrouwersMSternH. Standards for thoracic surgical oncology in a single-payer healthcare system. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007; 84(2): 693–701.
59.
Cancer Care Ontario and Cancer Quality Council of Ontario. Cancer System Quality Index. [Accessed May 2, 2008]. Available from: http://www.cancercare.on.ca
60.
HedbergCA. Value based purchasing for physicians under Medicare. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Ways and Means. U.S. House of Representatives. Session 109–50. [Accessed May 1, 2008]. Available from: http://waysandmeans.house.gov
61.
ClancyCMScullyT. A call to excellence. Health Affairs, 2003; 22(2): 113–5.
62.
RichardsonWCCorriganJM. Provider responsibility and system redesign: Two sides of the same coin. Health Affairs, 2003; 22(2): 116–8.
63.
LewisS. Physicians, it's in your court now. Canadian Medical Assocation Journal, 2005; 173(3): 275–7.
64.
SchumacherA. Doctors put patients first in health care debate. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2005; 173(3): 277–8.
