The use of healthcare services in Winnipeg is examined to determine whether groups who appear to have a higher need for medical care actually get more care. Despite universal coverage, considerable variation in service use rates exists. Most of the basic healthcare services are provided in accordance with need as measured by premature mortality rates. Nevertheless, visits to specialist physicians, a variety of high profile procedures, and screening and preventative services appear not to be provided in accordance with need.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BirchSEylesJHurleyJHutchinsonBChambersS. A needs-based approach to resource allocation in healthcare. Canadian Public Policy1993; 19(1): 68–85.
2.
EylesJBirchSChambersSHurleyJHutchinsonB. A needs-based methodology for allocating healthcare resources in Ontario, Canada: Development and an application. Social Science and Medicine1991; 33(4): 489–500.
3.
FrohlichNCarriereKC. Issues in Needs Based Funding. A Volume in the Population Health Information System issued by the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation. Winnipeg, Manitoba; 1997.
4.
FinkelsteinMM. Do factors other than need determine utilization of physicians' services in Ontario?CMAJ2001; 165(5): 565–70.
5.
FrohlichNFransooRRoosN. Indicators of Health Status and Health Service Use for the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority. A Volume in the Population Health Information System issued by the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation. Winnipeg, Manitoba; March 2001.
6.
CarstairsVMorrisR. Deprivation and Health in Scotland. Aberdeen, Scotland: Aberdeen University Press; 1991.
7.
EylesJBirchSChambersS. Fair shares for the zone: Allocating healthcare resources for the native populations of the Sioux Lookout zone, Northern Ontario. Canadian Geographer1994; 38(20): 134–150.
8.
FrankJWMustardJF. The determinants of health from a historical perspective. Daedalus1994; 123: 1–19.
9.
MarmotMGShipleyMJRoseG. Inequalities in death — specific explanations of a general pattern?Lancet1984; 1003–1006.
10.
MarmotMGKogevinasMElstonMA. Social/Economic status and disease. Annual Review of Public Health1987; 8: 111–135.
11.
TownsendPDavidsonN. Concepts of health and inequality. In: The Black Report. London, England: Penguin Books; 1982: Pp. 33–42.
12.
DunlapSCoytePCMcIsaacW. Socio-economic status and the utilization of physicians' services: Results from the Canadian National Population Health SurveySoc Sci and Med2000; 51: 123–133.
13.
MustardCAMcClartyBMMacEwanDW. The influence of referral protocols on the utilization of magnetic resonance imaging: Evidence from Manitoba. Can Assn of Radiologists Jour1994; 45(2): 117–123.
14.
MustardCMcClartyBMacEwanD. The influence of magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. Academic Radiology1996; 3(7): 589–595.
15.
CohenMMRoosNP. Cervical cytology screening after tubal sterilization. Am J of Prevent Med1986; 2: 220–225.
