This paper reviews the reliability and validity of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, which is being used increasingly in Canadian nursing homes and continuing care facilities. The central issues that surround the development and implementation of a standardized assessment such as the MDS are presented, including implications for health care managers in how to approach data quality concerns. With other sectors such as home care and inpatient psychiatry using MDS for national reporting, these issues have importance in and beyond residential care management.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RAI MDS 2.0 and RAPs Canadian version: User's manual, second edition. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information2005.
MorrisJNHawesCFriesBEPhillipsCDMorVKatzS. Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes. The Gerontologist1990; 30(3): 293–307.
4.
HawesCMorrisJNPhillipsCDMorVFriesBENonemakerS. Reliability estimates for the minimum data set for nursing home resident assessment and care screening (MDS). The Gerontologist1995; 35(2): 172–8.
5.
MorrisJNNonemakerSMurphyKHawesCFriesBEMorV. A commitment to change: Revision of HCFA's RAI. Journal of the American Geriatric Society1997; 45(8): 1011–6.
6.
PhillipsCDChuCWMorrisJNHawesC. Effects of cognitive impairment on the reliability of geriatric assessments in nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatric Society1993; 41(2): 136–142.
7.
SgadariAMorrisJNFriesBELjunggrenGJónssonPVDuPaquierJN. Efforts to establish the reliability of the resident assessment instrument. Age and Ageing1997; 26Suppl 2: 27–30.
8.
LjunggrenGFriesBEWinbladU. International validation and reliability of a patient classification system for long-term care. European Journal of Gerontology1992; 1: 372–383.
9.
Nursing home resident resource utilization groups. Washington, DC: Office of the Inspector General2001.
10.
BjörkgrenMAHäkkinenUFinne-SoveriUHFriesBE. Validity and reliability of resource utilization groups (RUG-III) in Finnish long-term care facilities. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health1999; 27(3): 228–234.
11.
MorVAngelelliJJonesRRoyJMooreTMorrisJ. Inter-rater reliability of nursing home quality indicators in the U.S. BMC Health Services Research2003; 3: 20.
12.
ResnickNMBrandeisGHBaumannMMMorrisJN. Evaluating a national assessment strategy for urinary incontinence in nursing home residents: Reliability of the minimum data set and validity of the resident assessment protocol. Neurourology and Urodynamics1996; 15(6): 583–98.
13.
OuslanderJG. Maximizing the minimum data set. Journal of the American Geriatric Society1994; 42(11): 1212–3.
14.
TeresiJAHolmesD. Should MDS data be used for research?The Gerontologist1992; 32(2): 148–9.
15.
HawesCPhillipsCDMorVFriesBEMorrisJ. MDS data should be used for research. The Gerontologist1992; 32: 563–4.
16.
PhillipsCDMorrisJN. The potential for using administrative and clinical data to analyze outcomes for the cognitively impaired: An assessment of the minimum data set for nursing homes. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders1997; 11Suppl 6: 162–7.
17.
MorrisJNFriesBEMehrDRHawesCPhillipsCMorV. MDS cognitive performance scale. Journal of Gerontology1994; 49(4): M174–82.
18.
HartmaierSLSloanePDGuessHAKochGGMitchellCMPhillipsCD. Validation of the minimum data set cognitive performance scale: Agreement with the mini-mental state examination. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Science and Medical Science1995; 50: M128–33.
19.
BurrowsABMorrisJNSimonSEHirdesJPPhillipsC. Development of a minimum data set-based depression rating scale for use in nursing homes. Age and Ageing2000; 29: 165–72.
20.
MorrisJNFriesBEMorrisSA. Scaling ADLs within the MDS. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biologocal Science and Medical Science1999; 54(11): M546–53.
21.
MorVBrancoKFleishmanJHawesCPhillipsCMorrisJ. The structure of social engagement among nursing home residents. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Science and Social Science1995; 50(1): P1–8.
22.
FriesBESimonSEMorrisJNFlodstromCBooksteinFL. Pain in U.S. nursing homes: Validating a pain scale for the minimum data set. The Gerontologist2001; 41: 173–9.
23.
HirdesJPFrijtersDHTeareGF. The MDS-CHESS scale: A new measure to predict mortality in institutionalized older people. Journal of the American Geriatric Society2003; 51(1): 96–100.
24.
FrederiksenKTariotPDe JongheE. Minimum data set plus (MDS+) scores compared with scores from five rating scales. Journal of the American Geriatric Society1996; 44: 305–9.
25.
CastenRLawtonMPParmeleePAKlebanMH. Psychometric characteristics of the minimum data set I: Confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of the American Geriatric Society1998; 46(6): 726–35.
26.
LawtonMPCastenRParmeleePAVan HaitsmaKCornJKlebanMH. Psychometric characteristics of the minimum data set II: Validity. Journal of the American Geriatric Society1998; 46(6): 736–44.
27.
SnowdenMMcCormickWRussoJSrebnikDComtoisKBowenJTeriL. Validity and responsiveness of the minimum data set. Journal of the American Geriatric Society1999; 47(8): 1000–4.
28.
Gruber-BaldiniALZimmermanSIMortimoreEMagazinerJ. The validity of the minimum data set in measuring the cognitive impairment of persons admitted to nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatric Society2000; 48(12): 1601–6.
29.
Hill-WestmorelandEEGruber-BaldiniAL. Falls documentation in nursing homes: Agreement between the minimum data set and chart abstractions of medical and nursing documentation. Journal of the American Geriatric Society2005; 53(2): 268–73.
30.
StevensonKBMooreJWSleeperB. Validity of the minimum data set in identifying urinary tract infections in residents of long-term care facilities. Journal of the American Geriatric Society2004; 52(5): 707–11.
31.
BlaumCSO'NeillEFClementsKMFriesBEFiataroneMA. Validity of the minimum data set for assessing nutritional status in nursing home residents. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition1997; 66(4): 787–94.
32.
BowmanJJKellerHH. Assessing nutritional risk of long-term care residents. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research2005; 66: 155–161.
33.
ZulkowskiK. Construct validity of minimum data set items within the context of the braden conceptual schema. Ostomy/Wound Management1998; 44(10): 36–40; 42–4; 46–7.
34.
McCurrenCDoweDRattleDLooneyS. Depression among nursing home elders: Testing an intervention strategy. Applied Nursing Research1999; 12(4): 185–95.
35.
McCurrenC. Assessment for depression among nursing home elders: Evaluation of the MDS mood assessment. Geriatric Nursing2002; 23(2): 103–8.
36.
AndersonRLBuckwalterKCBuchananRJMaasMLImhofSL. Validity and reliability of the Minimum Data Set Depression Rating Scale (MDSDRS) for older adults in nursing homes. Age and Ageing2003; 32: 435–8.
37.
HendrixCCSakauyeKMKarabatsosGDaigleD. The use of the minimum data set to identify depression in the elderly. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association2003; 4(6): 308–12.
38.
KoehlerMRabinowitzTHirdesJStonesMCarpenterGIFriesBE. Measuring depression in nursing home residents with the MDS and GDS: An observational psychometric study. BMC Geriatrics2005; 5: 1.
39.
EngleVFGraneyMJChanA. Accuracy and bias of licensed practical nurse and nursing assistant ratings of nursing home residents' pain. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Science and Medical Science2001; 56: M405–11.
40.
FisherSEBurgioLDThornBEAllen-BurgeRGerstleJRothDL. Pain assessment and management in cognitively impaired nursing home residents: Association of certified nursing assistant pain report, minimum data set pain report, and analgesic medication use. Journal of the American Geriatric Society2002; 50(1): 152–6.
41.
Cohen-MansfieldJ. The adequacy of the minimum data set assessment of pain in cognitively impaired nursing home residents. Journal of Pain Symptom Management2004; 27: 343–51.
42.
Cohen-MansfieldJ. Nursing staff members' assessments of pain in cognitively impaired nursing home residents. Pain Management Nursing2005; 6(2): 68–75.
43.
ChuLSchnelleJFCadoganMPSimmonsSF. Using the minimum data set to select nursing home residents for interview about pain. Journal of the American Geriatric Society2004; 52(12): 2057–61.
44.
SchnelleJFWoodSSchnelleERSimmonsSF. Measurement sensitivity and the minimum data set depression quality indicator. The Gerontologist2001; 41: 401–5.
45.
WuNMillerSCLapaneKGozaloP. The problem of assessment bias when measuring the hospice effect on nursing home residents' pain. Journal of Pain Symptom Management2003; 26(5): 998–1009.
46.
MorrisJNFriesBESteelKIkegamiNBernabeiRCarpenterGI. Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting: Applicability of the MDS-HC. Journal of the American Geriatric Society1997; 45(8): 1017–24.
47.
MorrisJNJonesRNFriesBEHirdesJP. Convergent validity of minimum data set-based performance quality indicators in postacute care settings. American Journal of Medical Quality2004; 19(6): 242–7.
48.
SteelKLjunggrenGTopinkovaEMorrisJNVitaleCParzuchowskiJ. The RAI-PC: An assessment instrument for palliative care in all settings. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine2003; 20(3): 211–9.
49.
HirdesJPSmithTFRabinowitzTYamauchiKPerezETelegdiNC. The Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health (RAI-MH): Inter-rater reliability and convergent validity. Journal of Behavioral Health Services Research2002; 29(4), 419–32.
50.
ParmeleePA. Quality improvement in nursing homes: The elephants in the room. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society2004; 52(12): 2138–40.
