Stakeholder Engagement and Public Policy Evaluation: Factors Contributing to the Development and Implementation of a Regional Network for Geriatric Care
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2007
Stakeholder Engagement and Public Policy Evaluation: Factors Contributing to the Development and Implementation of a Regional Network for Geriatric Care
The development and implementation of a regional network that provides universally accessible and consistent services to the frail elderly living in Southwestern Ontario is described. Through continuous stakeholder engagement, clear network goals were identified and operationalized. Stakeholder commitment to the integration of expertise and specialized services, to evidence-based public policy and to iterative evaluation cycles were key to network success.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
StuckAESiuALWielandGDRubensteinLZAdamsJ. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet1993; 342: 1032–1036.
2.
HoganDBBeatieBLBergmanJDalzielBGoldlistCMacKnightF. Submission of the Canadian Geriatrics Society to the Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada. Geriatrics Today: Journal of the Canadian Geriatrics Society2002; 5: 7–12.
3.
GagnonL. Statistics Canada: 14% of Canadians have no family doctor. Canadian Medical Association Journal2004; 171(2): 124.
4.
DalzielWB. Future of health care for the elderly in Canada. Geriatrics Today: Journal of the Canadian Geriatrics Society2002; 5: 3–4.
5.
LeattPPinkGNaylorD. Integrated delivery systems: Has their time come in Canada?CMAJ1996; 154: 803–809.
6.
StoleePKesslerLLe ClairJK. A community development and outreach program in geriatric mental health; Four years' experience. Journal of the American Geriatric Society1996; 44: 314–320.
7.
MinklerMWallersteinN. Improving health through community organization and community building. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (3rd edition) 2002. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 241–269.
8.
TuckmanBW. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin1965; 63: 384–399.
9.
Ontario Ministry of Finance.Ontario population projections. [Updated April 28, 2006] Available from: http://www.fin.gov.on.ca
10.
ProvanKGMilwardHB. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review2001; 61: 414–423.
11.
ShortellSMGilliesRRAndersonDAMitchellJBMorganKL. Creating organized delivery systems: The barriers and facilitators. Hospital and Health Services Administration1993; 38: 447–466.
12.
StuckAEMinderCEPeter-WuestIGillmannGEgliCKesselringA. A randomized trial of in-home visits for disability prevention in community-dwelling older people at low and high risk for nursing home admission. Archives of Internal Medicine2000; 160: 977–986.
13.
EpsteinAMHallJAFretwellMFeldsteinMDeCiantisMLTognettiJ. Consultative geriatric assessment for ambulatory patients: A randomized trial in a health maintenance organization. Journal of the American Medical Association1990; 263: 538–544.
14.
SilvermanMMusaDMartinDCLaveJRAdamsJRicciEM. Evaluation of outpatient geriatric assessment: A randomized multi-site trial. J Am Geriatri Soc1995; 43: 733–740.
15.
CrillyRGHarrisDStoleePEllettFK. A framework for development of geriatric services in rural areas. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education2000; 20: 59–72.
16.
HarrisDCrillyRGStoleePEllettFK. Improving a system of care for elderly persons in rural areas. The Gerontologist1999; 39: 362–367.
17.
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.Ontario's alzheimer strategy. Preparing for our future. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer for Ontario; 1999.
18.
McAineyCAStoleePHillierLMHarrisDHamiltonPKesslerL. Evaluation of the sustained implementation of a mental health learning initiative in longterm care. International Psychogeriatrics. 2007; 19: 842–858.
19.
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.Making it happen: Implementation plan for mental health reform. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer for Ontario; 1999.
20.
Specialized Geriatric Services, St. Joseph's Health Care London.A plan to integrate and develop specialized geriatric services in London and Southwestern Ontario. London, ON: Author; 2000.
21.
Specialized Geriatric Services, St. Joseph's Health Care London.The Southwestern Ontario Geriatric Assessment Network. Evaluation report. London, ON: Author; 2003.
22.
GloverC. Rethinking the development of a geriatric assessment network: A program evaluation of the implementation of the Southwestern Ontario Geriatric Assessment Network for the years 2004/2005. Master's thesis. London, ON: University of Western Ontario; 2005.
23.
KernaghanKMarsonBBorinsS. The new public organization. Toronto, ON: Institute of Public Administration of Canada; 2000.
24.
ProssPA. Group politics and public policy. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press; 1986.
25.
McLaughlinJAJordanGB. Logic models: A tool for telling your program's performance story. Evaluation and Program Planning1999; 22: 65–72.
26.
KaplanRSNortonDP. The balanced scorecard translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1996.
27.
InouyeSK. Delirium in hospitalized older patients: Recognition and risk factors. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology1998; 11: 118–25.
