Current conceptualizations of knowledge transfer reinforce the notion of a linear process between researchers and clinicians, who are seen as operating separately with different agenda. This paper uses a case study to illustrate a dynamic model of knowledge integration involving integrated and interdependent relationships among researchers, clinicians, and decision-makers. We believe the principles of this model are more likely to lead to effective use of research evidence in clinical practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GrolRGrimshawJ. From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet2003; 362: 1225–1230.
2.
GrolR. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Medical Care2001; 39: 46–54.
3.
BrazilKMacLeodSGuestB. Collaborative practice: A strategy to improve the relevance of health services research. Health Management Forum2002; 15: 18–24.
4.
BeroLGrilliRGrimshawJHarveyEOxmanADThomsonMA. Closing the gap between research and practice: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ1998; 317: 465–468.
5.
BroadML. Overview of transfer of training: From learning to performance. Perform Improve Q1997; 10: 7–21.
6.
SengePM. The fifth discipline. New York: Bantam; 1990.
7.
KnowlesMS. The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston, TX: Gulf Pub; 1990.
8.
HainesADonaldA. Making better use of research findings. BMJ1998; 317: 72–75.
9.
SchonDA. Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
10.
BanduraA. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
11.
BrownJSDuguidP. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ Sci1991; 2: 40–57.
12.
LinscottJSpeeRFlintFFisherA. Creating a culture of patient-focused care through a learner-centered philosophy. Can J Nurs Leadership1999; 12: 5–10.
13.
GriffinPEdwardsN. Literature review: Research receptor capacity and research utilization. Community Health Research Unit, University of Ottawa. Ottawa, ON; 2002.
14.
LavisJNRobertsonDWoodsideJMMcLeodCBAbelsonJ. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?The Milbank Quarterly2003; 81(2): 221–248.
15.
ClarkeCLWilcocksonJ. Professional and organizational learning: Analyzing the relationship with the development of practice. J Adv Nurs2001; 34: 264–272.
16.
FinkRThompsonCJBonnesD. Overcoming barriers and promoting the use of research in practice. J Nurs Admin2005; 35: 121–129.
17.
SpringBPagotoSKaufmannPGWhitlockEPGlasgowRESmithTW. Invitation to a dialogue between researchers and clinicians about evidence-based behavioral medicine. Ann Behav Med2005; 30(2): 135–137.
18.
LomasJ. Using “linkage and exchange” to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Aff2000; 19: 236–240.
19.
RichR. Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outcomes. Knowledge and Policy1997; 11–24.
20.
Registered Nurses Association of Ontario.Nursing best practice guideline: Assessment and management of pain. Toronto, ON: Author; 2002.
21.
StoleePHillierLMEsbaughJBolNMcKellarLGauthierN. Instruments for the assessment of pain in older persons with cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc2005; 53(2): 319–326.
22.
Rycroft-MaloneJKitsonAHarveyGMcCormackBSeersKTitchenA. Ingredients for change: Revisiting a conceptual framework. Qual Saf Health Care2002; 11: 174–180.
23.
JacobsonNButterillDGoeringP. Consulting as a strategy for knowledge transfer. The Milbank Quarterly, 2005; 83(2): 299–321.
24.
BerwickDM. Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA2003; 289: 1969–1975.
25.
GreenhalghTRobertGMacFarlaneFBatePKyriakidouO. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly2004; 82: 581–629.
26.
HirdesJPSmithRGRabinowitzTYamauchiKPerezETelegdiNC. The Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health (RAI-MH): Inter-rater reliability and convergent validity. J Behav Health Serv Res2002; 29(4): 419–432.
27.
ZelmerJ. From access to quality to outcomes — Using health information to improve health care. Presentation at the Canadian Institute of Health Information Data Users' Conference, September 2004, Ottawa, ON.
28.
LoganJGrahamID. Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Science Communication1998; 20: 227–246.
29.
JacobsonNButterillDGoeringP. Development of a framework for knowledge translation: Understanding user context. J Health Serv Res Policy2003; 8: 94–99.
30.
RosswurmMALarrabeeJH. A model for change to evidence-based practice. Image J Nurs Sch1999; 31(41): 317–322.
31.
MohideEAKingB. Building a foundation for evidence-based practice: Experiences in a tertiary hospital. Evid Based Nurs2003; 6: 100–103.
32.
Canadian Insitutes for Health Research.Knowledge translation strategy 2004–2009: Innovation in action. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institutes for Health Research; 2004.
