Stimulation of the cochlear nucleus (CN) has been used on a limited basis for rehabilitation of a select group of patients with bilateral acoustic neuromas. These patients were implanted with an electrode placed on the surface of the CN after resection of their tumors. Animal studies have demonstrated greater efficiency of a penetrating CN electrode in activating the central auditory system than a surface electrode. The objective of this work was to study the electrically evoked middle latency response generated by stimulation through a penetrating multichannel CN electrode in an animal model. Six pigmented guinea pigs underwent implantation with a penetrating multichannel CN electrode. Threshold, latency, and input-output functions of electrically evoked middle latency responses with different stimulation pads were studied. There were systematic differences in the latency and amplitude of the input-output functions depending on the site of stimulation within the CN. The results support the hypothesis that discrete activation of neuronal subpopulations within the CN is possible with a penetrating multichannel micro-electrode.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EdgertonBHouseWHitselbergerW.Hearing by cochlear nucleus stimulation in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1982;(Suppl)91:117–24.
2.
HitselbergerWEHouseWFEdgertonBJ. Cochlear nucleus implant. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1984;92:52–4.
3.
McElveenJTHitselbergerWEHouseWF. Electrical stimulation of cochlear nucleus in man. Am J Otol1985;(Suppl)6:88–91.
4.
EisenbergLSMaltanAAPortilloF. Electrical stimulation of the auditory brainstem structure in deafened adults. J Rehabil Res Dev1987;24:9–22.
5.
OttoSRHouseWFBrackmannDE. Auditory brainstem implant: effect of tumor size and preoperative hearing level on function. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1990;99:789–90.
6.
BrackmannDEHitselbergerWENelsonRA. Auditory brainstem implant: issues in surgical implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1993;108:624–33.
7.
ShannonRVFayadJMooreJ. Auditory brainstem implant: II. Postsurgical issues and performance. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1993; 108: 634–42.
8.
ShannonRV.Threshold functions for electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus. Hear Res1989;40:173–8.
9.
NiparkoJAltschulerRXueX. Surgical implantation and biocompatibility of CNS auditory prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1989;98:965–70.
10.
NiparkoJAltschulerREvansD. Auditory brainstem prosthesis: biocompatibility of stimulation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1989;101:344–52.
11.
EvansDANiparkoJKAltschulerRA. Demonstration of prosthetic activation of central auditory pathways using [14C]-2-deoxyglucose. Laryngoscope1990;100:128–37.
12.
El-KashlanHKNiparkoJKKilenyPR. Direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus: autoradiographic patterns of central auditory pathway activation [abstract]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1990;103:189.
13.
El-KashlanHKNiparkoJKAltschulerRA. Prosthetic stimulation of the cochlear nucleus: dynamic range of action. ARO Abstracts1991;14:158.
14.
El-KashlanHKNiparkoJKAltschulerRA. Direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus: surface versus penetrating stimulation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1991;105:533–43.
15.
El-KashlanHKNoorilyADNiparkoJK. Metabolic activity of central auditory structures following prolonged deafferentation. Laryngoscope1993;103:399–405.
16.
KrausNSmithIMcGeeT.Rate and filter effects on the developing middle latency response. Audiology1987;26:257–68.
17.
KagaKHinkRFShinodaY. Evidence for a primary cortical origin of a middle latency auditory evoked potential in cats. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1980;50:254–66.
18.
KilenyPRKeminkJL.Electrically evoked middle-latency auditory potentials in cochlear implant candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1987;113:1072–7.
19.
BurtonMJMillerJMKilenyPR.Middle latency responses: I. Electrical and acoustic excitation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1989; 115: 59–62.
20.
Stimulating electrodes based on thin-film technology. Quarterly report #9. Contract NIH-NINDS-N01-NS-9-2359. Michigan Center for Neural Communication Technology; 1992.
21.
HetkeJFLundJLNajafiK. Silicon ribbon cables for chronically implantable microelectrode arrays. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng1994; 41: 314–21.
22.
RoseJEGreenwoodDDGoldbergJM. Some discharge characteristics of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Tonotopical organization, relation to spike-counts to tone intensity, and firing patterns of single elements. J Neurophysiol1963; 26: 294–320.
23.
RyanAFWoolfNKSharpFR.Tonotopic organization in the central auditory pathway of the Mongolian gerbil: a 2-deoxyglu-cose study. J Comp Neurol1982;207:369–80.
24.
RyanAFWoolfNK.Development of tonotopic representation in the central auditory system of the Mongolian gerbil: a 2-deoxyglucose study. Dev Brain Res1988;469:61–70.
25.
RyanAFBravermanSWoolfNK. Auditory neural activity evoked by pure-tone stimulation as a function of intensity. Brain Res1988;483:293–302.
26.
HuangCFexJ.Tonotopic organization in the inferior colliculus of the rat demonstrated with the 2-deoxyglucose method. Exp Brain Res1986;61:506–12.
27.
WebsterWRServiereJBatiniC. Autoradiographic demonstration with 2-(14C)-deoxyglucose of frequency selectivity in the auditory system of cats under conditions of functional activity. Neurosci Lett1978;10:43–8.
28.
ServiereJWebsterWRCalfordMB.Isofrequency labeling revealed by a combined [14C]-2-deoxyglucose, electrophysiological, and horseradish peroxidase study of the inferior colliculus in the cat. J Comp Neurol1984;228:463–77.
29.
RyanAFMillerJMWangZ. Spatial distribution of neural activity evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res1990;50:57–70.
30.
WarrWB.Fiber degeneration following lesions in the multipolar and globular cell areas in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. Brain Res1972;40:247–70.
31.
WarrWB.Fiber degeneration following lesions in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. Exp Neurol1969; 23: 140–55.
32.
WarrWB.Fiber degeneration following lesions in the anterior ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. Exp Neurol1966;14:453–74.
33.
OsenKK.Projection of the cochlear nuclei on the inferior colliculus in the cat. J Comp Neurol1972;144:355–72.
34.
BourkTRMielcarzJPNorrisBE.Tonotopic organization of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. Hear Res1981;4:215–41.
35.
FredericksonCJGerkenGM.Functional characteristics of cochlear nucleus in behaving cat examined by acoustic masking of electrical stimuli. J Neurophysiol1978;41:1535–45.
36.
ShannonRV.Quantitative comparison of electrically and acoustically evoked auditory perception: implications for the location of perceptual mechanisms. Prog Brain Res1993;97:261–9.
