This research utilizes referent cognitions theory (RCT, Folger, 1993) to investigate the filing of discrimination legal-claims by terminated workers. Specifically, three questions are investigated: (1) whether procedural, distributive, and interactional justice interact to predict discrimination legal-claiming; (2) whether state anger (a reaction to a situation) partially mediates the relationship between the three-way interaction of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice, and legal-claiming; and (3) whether trait anger (a dispositional trait) moderates the relationship between this three-way justice interaction and legal-claiming. Five hundred eighty-three terminated employees were surveyed at unemployment insurance offices on the east coast. The results support predictions that a three-way justice interaction predicts legal-claiming, that state anger is a partial mediator of this relationship, and that trait anger moderates the relationship between the three-way justice interaction and legal-claiming. The implications for organizational justice and RCT are discussed. Further, there is discussion of managerial interventions to reduce legal-claiming.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J. S.1965. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol.2, 267–299. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2.
Adams, J. S., & Freedman, S.1976. Equity theory revisited: Comments and annotated bibliography. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 9, 43–90. New York: Academic Press.
3.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G.1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Ajzen, I.1988. Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.
5.
Allred, K. G.1999. Anger and retaliation: Toward an understanding of impassioned conflict in organizations. Research in Negotiation in Organizations, 7: 27–58.
6.
Bandura, A.1986. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
Baron, R., & Kenny, D.1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.
8.
Bem, D., & Allen, A.1974. On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81: 506–520.
9.
Bem, D., & Funder, D.1978. Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of situations. Psychlogical Review, 85: 485–501.
10.
Bies, R. J.1987. The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: Vol. 9, 289–319. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
11.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S.1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12.
Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M.2001. A passion for justice: The rationality and morality of revenge. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: 197–208. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
Bies, R. J., Tripp, T. M., & Kramer, R. M.1997. At the breaking point: Cognitive and social dynamics of revenge in organizations. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations: 18–36. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Bies, R. J., & Tyler, T. R.1993. The “litigation mentality” in organizations: A test of alternative psychological explanations. Organization Science, 4: 352–366.
15.
Brehm, J.1999. The intensity of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3: 2–22.
16.
Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B.1996. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120: 189–208.
17.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P.1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
18.
Colquitt, J., Conlon, D., Wesson, M., Porter, C., & Ng, K.2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 425–445.
19.
Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R.1989. Referent cognitions and task autonomy: Beyond equity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 293–299.
20.
Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R.1991. Procedural justice and worker motivation. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (5th ed.): 131–143. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Cropanzano, R., Weiss, H., Suckow, K., & Grandey, A.2000. Doing justice to workplace emotion. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. E. J. Hartel, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: 49–62. Westport, CN: Quorum Books.
22.
Crutcher, R. J.1994. Telling what we know: The use of verbal report methodologies in psychological research, feature review. American Psychological Society, 5: 241–241.
23.
Deffenbacher, J. L.1992. Trait anger: Theory, findings, and implications. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment: Vol. 9, 177–201. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
Donohue, J. J.1997. Foundations of employment discrimination law. New York: Oxford University.
25.
EEOC. 2001. Available: http://www.eeoc.gov
26.
Folger, R.1987. Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical, and policy perspectives: 183–215. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27.
Folger, R.1993. Reactions to mistreatment at work. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research: 161–183. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
Folger, R., & Baron, R.1996. Violence and hostility at work: A model of reactions to perceived injustice. In G. R. Van den Bos & E. Q. Bulatao (Eds.), Violence on the job: Identifying risks and developing solutions: 51–85. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29.
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R.2001. Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice: 1–55. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
Folger, R., & Martin, C.1986. Relative depravation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22: 531–546.
31.
Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J.1997. Antisocial behavior in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Giacalone, R. A., Riordan, C. A., & Rosenfeld, P.1997. Employee sabotage: Toward a practitioner-scholar understanding. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations: 109–129. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Goldman, B. M.2001. Toward an understanding of employment discrimination claiming: An integration of organizational justice and social information processing theories. Personnel Psychology, 54: 361–386.
34.
Greenberg, J.1987. A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12: 9–22.
35.
Greenberg, J.1990. Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden costs of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 55–61.
36.
Greenberg, J.1993. Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54: 81–103.
37.
Greenberg, J., & Lind, E.2000. The pursuit of organizational justice: From conceptualization to implication to application. In C. L. Cooper & E. A. Locke (Eds.), I/O psychology: What we know about theory and practice: 72–105. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
38.
Greenhaus, J., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W.1990. Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 64–86.
39.
Groth, M., Goldman, B., Gilliland, S., & Bies, R.2002. Commitment to legal claiming: Influences of attributions, social guidance, and organizational tenure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 781–788.
40.
Guilford, J. P.1954. Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
41.
Guttman, L.1950. The basis for scalogram analysis. In S. A. Stouffer, et al. (Eds.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
42.
Stouffer, et al. (Eds.), Measurement and prediction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
43.
Hensler, D., Marquis, S., Abrahamese, A., Berry, S., Ebener, P., Lewis, E., Lind, E., MacCoun, R., Manning, W., Rgowski, J., & Viana, M.1991. Compensation for accidental injuries in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
44.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.1982. Availability and the simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: 201–208. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Kaiser, D., & Miller, C.2001. Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychologicial Bulletin, 27: 254–263.
46.
Kenny, D., Kashy, D., & Bolger, N.1998. Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.): Vol. 1, 233–265. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
47.
Kritzer, H., Bogart, W., & Vidmar, N.1991. To confront or not to confront: Measuring claiming rates in discrimination grievances. Law and Society Review, 25: 101–115.
48.
Lane, C., & Hobfoll, S.1992. How loss affects anger and alienates potential supporters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60: 935–942.
49.
Lee, J.2001, February 21. Discarded dreams of dot-com rejects. The New York Times: C1–C1, C8–C8.
50.
Leventhal, G. S.1980. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchanges: Advances in theory and research: 27–55. New York: Plenum Press.
51.
Lieberman, J. K. (1981). The litigious society. New York: Basic.
52.
Lind, E. A.1997. Litigation and claiming in organizations. In R. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in the workplace: 150–171. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
53.
Lind, E. A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S., & Welchans, T. D.2000. The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 557–590.
54.
Masterson, S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S.2000. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment or work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 738–748.
55.
Moorman, R. H.1991. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 845–855.
56.
Ohlott, P., Ruderman, M., & McCauley, C.1994. Gender differences in managers’ developmental job experiences. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 46–67.
57.
O’Malley, M. N., & Greenberg, J.1993. Sex differences in restoring justice: The down payment effect. Journal of Research in Personality, 17: 174–185.
58.
Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W.1986. Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pittman Publishing.
59.
Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J.1993. Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. J., & Minton, J. W.1992. Organizational justice. New York: Lexington Books.
62.
SHRM. 2000. Employment Practices Liability Survey. Society for Human Resource Management. Available: www.jacksonlewis.com/publications/surveys/workplace
63.
Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R.1997. Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 434–443.
64.
Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Tesluk, P.1999. Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 100–108.
65.
Spielberger, C., Jacobs, G., Russell, S., & Crane, R. S.1983. Assessment of anger: The State-Trait Anger Scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment: Vol. 2, 159–187. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66.
Spielberger, C., Reheiser, E., & Sydeman, S.1995. Measuring the experience, expression, and control of anger. In H. Kassinove (Ed.), Anger disorders: Definition, diagnosis, and treatment: 49–67. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
67.
Spielberger, C., Sarason, I., Kulcsar, & Van Heck, G.1991. Stress and emotion: Anxiety, anger, and curiosity: Vol. 14. New York: NY: Hemisphere Publishing.
68.
Spielberger, C., Sydeman, S., Owen, A., & Marsh, B.1999. Measuring anxiety and anger with the state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) and the state-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI). In M. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (2nd ed.): 993–1021. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69.
Story, D., & Deffenbacher, J. L.1985, April. General anger and personality. Paper presented at the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Tucson, AZ.
70.
Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J.1990. Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings: 77–98. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
71.
USC. 2001. Administrative office of the United States courts. Available: www.uscourts.gov
72.
Wanberg, C., Bunce, L., & Gavin, M.1999. Perceived fairness of layoffs among individuals who have been laid off: A longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 52: 59–84.
73.
Weiner, B., Russell, D., & Lerman, D.1979. The cognition-emotion process in achievement-related contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 1211–1220.
74.
Weiss, H., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R.1999. Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 786–794.
75.
Youngblood, S., Trevino, L., & Favia, M.1992. Reactions to unjust dismissal and third-party resolution: A justice framework. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5: 283–307.
