The present study examines both positive and negative norms of reciprocity in managerial work relationships by assessing three components of reciprocal behavior: immediacy, equivalence, and interest motive. The findings show that subordinate reports of immediacy, equivalence, and self-interest were negatively associated, and mutual-interest was positively associated, with relationship quality as reported by both subordinates and managers (other-interest was not significant). These components of reciprocity were also subjected to cluster analysis to identify groupings of reciprocity styles. The results indicate styles reflecting high quality (n = 65), low quality (n = 120), and negative social exchanges (n = 23). Analyses addressing reciprocity configurations and work outcomes showed that the higher quality exchange relationships had higher levels of perceived organizational support and altruism (but not commitment) than the lower and negative exchange groups, while only the negative reciprocity group showed lower levels of performance and conscientiousness as rated by the manager.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashforth, B.1997. Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14: 126–140.
2.
Batson, C. D.1993. Communal and exchange relationships: What is the difference?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6): 677–683.
3.
Bies, R. J.2000. Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S.1964. The managerial grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
5.
Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F., Markham, S., Alluto, J., Newman, J., Dumas, M., Nachman, S., Naughton, T., Kim, K., Al-Kelabi, S., Lee, S., & Keller, T.1995. Individualized leadership: A new multiple-level approach. Leadership Quarterly, 6: 413–450.
6.
Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C.1986. Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11: 618–634.
7.
Duarte, N. T., Goodson, J. R., & Klich, N. R.1994. Effects of dyadic quality and duration on performance appraisal. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 499–521.
8.
Duffy, M. K., & Ferrier, W. J. in press. Birds of a feather...? How supervisor-subordinate dissimilarity moderates the influence of supervisor behaviors on workplace attitudes. Group and organization management.
9.
Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. 1998. Social undermining and social support in the workplace. Paper presented at annual meeting of Academy of Management, San Diego.
10.
Gouldner, A. W.1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25: 161–177.
11.
Graen, G. B., Novak, M., & Sommerkamp, P.1982. The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30: 109–131.
12.
Graen, G., & Uhl-Bien, M.1991. The transformation of professionals into self-managing and partially self-designing contributors: Toward a theory of leadership-making. Journal of Management Systems, 3(3): 33–48.
13.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M.1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6: 219–247.
14.
Hays, W. L.1988. Statistics. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
15.
Homans, G. C.1958. Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63: 597–606.
16.
Keashly, L., Trott, V., & MacLean, L. M.1994. Abusive behavior in the workplace: A preliminary investigation. Violence and Victims, 9: 341–357.
17.
Levi-Strauss, C.1957. The principle of reciprocity. In L. A. Coser & B. Rosenberg (Eds.), Sociological Theory: 90-90. New York: Macmillan.
18.
Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M.1998. Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1): 43–72.
19.
Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J.1997. Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In G. R. Ferris & K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management: Vol. 15, 47–119. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20.
Malinowski, B.1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge & Keagan Paul.
21.
Mauss, M.1950. The gift: The form and reason for exchange in primitive societies. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
22.
Medsker, G. J., Williams, L. J., & Holahan, P. J.1994. A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management, 20: 439–464.
23.
Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R.1993. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1175–1195.
24.
Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A.1997. Aggression in the workplace. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations: 37–67. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25.
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H.1993. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3): 527–556.
26.
Organ, D. W.1990. The subtle significance of job satisfaction. Clinical Laboratory Management Review, 4(1): 94–98.
27.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V.1974. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59: 603–609.
28.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J.1995. A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 555–572.
29.
Rousseau, D. M.1998. LMX meets the psychological contract: Looking inside the black box of leader-member exchange. In F. Dansereau & F. Yammarino (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple level approaches, contemporary and alternative: 149–154. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
30.
Ruehlman, L. S., & Karoly, P.1991. With a little flak from my friends: Development and preliminary validation of the Test of Negative Social Exchange (TENSE). Psychological Assessment, 3: 97–104.
31.
Sahlins, M.1972. Stone age economics. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
32.
Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C.1996. Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3): 219–227.
33.
Simmel, G.1950. The sociology of George Simmel. New York: Free Press.
34.
Sparrowe, R. T. 1998. Leader-member exchange, social networks, and differentiation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.
35.
Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C.1997. Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22: 522–552.
36.
Tepper, B. J.2000. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 178–190.
37.
Thurnwald, R.1932. Economics in primitive communities. London: Oxford University Press.
38.
Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M.1997. Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off?Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1089–1121.
39.
Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G., & Scandura, T.2000. Implications of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management: Vol. 18, 137–185. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40.
Vecchio, R. P., & Gobdel, B. C.1984. The vertical dyad linkage model of leadership: Problems and prospects. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34: 5–20.
41.
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C.1997. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 1: 82–111.
