This article evaluates the emergent academic field of entrepreneurship to better understand its progress and potential. We apply boundary and exchange concepts to examine 97 entrepreneurship articles published in leading management journals from 1985 to 1999. Some evidence was found of an upward trend in the number of published entrepreneurship articles, although the percentage of entrepreneurship articles remains low. The highly permeable boundaries of entrepreneurship facilitate intellectual exchange with other management areas but sometimes discourage the development of entrepreneurship theory and hinder legitimacy. We argue that focusing entrepreneurship research at the intersection of the constructs of individuals, opportunities, modes of organizing, and the environment will define the field and enhance legitimacy. Decision theory, start-up factors of production, information processing and network theory, and temporal dynamics are put forward for entrepreneurship scholars to explore important research questions in these intersections.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, H. E.1999. Organizations evolving. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
2.
Aldrich, H. E., & Baker, T.1997. Blinded by the cites? Has there been progress in entrepreneurship research? In D. L. Sexton & R. W. Smilor (Eds.), Entrepreneurship 2000 (pp. 377–400). Chicago: Upstart Publishing.
3.
Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, M. C.1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19: 645–670.
4.
Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Muller, E.1993. Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management Studies, 30: 834–834.
5.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A.1978. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
Bacharach, S. B.1989. Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14: 496–515.
7.
Barman, S., Tersine, R. J., & Buckley, M. R.1991. An empirical assessment of the perceived relevance of quality of POM-related journals by academicians. Journal of Operations Management, 10: 194–212.
8.
Barney, J. B.1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 42: 1231–1241.
9.
Barney, J. B.1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.
10.
Baron, R. A.1998. Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13: 275–294.
11.
Bird, B. J.1988. Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of Management Review, 13: 442–453.
12.
Bird, B. J., & West, G. P.1997. Time and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22: 5–9.
13.
Bruyat, C., & Julien, P. A.2001. Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 165–180.
14.
Burt, R. S.1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 339–365.
15.
Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B.1997. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12: 9–30.
16.
Coe, R. K., & Weinstock, I.1984. Evaluating the management journals: A second look. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 660–666.
17.
Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. in press. Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4): 81–100.
18.
Dierickx, I., & Cool, K.1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35: 1504–1511.
19.
Dubini, P., & Aldrich, H.1991. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6: 305–313.
20.
Eisenhardt, K.1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 543–576.
21.
Fiet, J. O.1996. The informational basis of entrepreneurial discovery. Small Business Economics, 8: 419–430.
22.
Franke, R. H., Edlund, T. W., & Oster, F.1990. The development of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 243–253.
23.
Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y.1997. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 750–783.
24.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B.1992. Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 921–955.
25.
Granovetter, M. S.1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360–1380.
26.
Hambrick, D. C.1989. Putting top managers back in the strategy picture. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 5–15.
27.
Harrison, R. T., & Leitch, C. M.1996. Discipline emergence in entrepreneurship: Accumulative fragmentalism or paradigmatic science?Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Change, 5(2): 65–83.
28.
Hayek, F. A.1945. The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35: 519–530.
29.
Hilmy, J.1992. Entrepreneurship, constructive disequilibrium, and accounting information. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Change, 1(1): 71–85.
30.
Huber, G. P., & Power, D. J.1985. Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 171–180.
31.
Jaques, E., & Cason, K.1994. Human capability. Maryland: Cason Hall & Co.
32.
Johnson, J., & Podsakoff, P.1994. Journal influence in the field of management: An analysis using Salancik’s index in a dependency network. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1392–1407.
33.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47: 263–291.
34.
Katz, J., & Gartner, W. B.1988. Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13: 429–441.
35.
Kirzner, I. M.1979. Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Knight, F. H.1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston. MA: Houghton Mifflin.
37.
Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C.1988. Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14: 139–161.
38.
MacMillan, I. C.1991. Editor’s note: Delineating a forum for entrepreneurship scholars. Journal of Business Venturing, 6: 83–87.
39.
MacMillan, I. C.1993. The emerging forum of entrepreneurship scholars. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 377–381.
40.
Ogbor, J. O.2000. Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology-critique of entrepreneurial studies. Journal of Management Studies, 37: 605–635.
41.
Phene, A., & Guisinger, S.1998. The stature of the Journal of International Business Studies. Journal of International Business Studies, 29: 621–632.
42.
Pfeffer, J.1993. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18: 599–620.
43.
Romano, C., & Ratnatunga, J.1996. A citation analysis of the impact of journals on contemporary small enterprise research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(3): 7–21.
44.
Salancik, G. R.1986. An index of subgroup influence in dependency networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 194–211.
45.
Sarasvathy, S. D. 2001. Effectual reasoning in entrepreneurial decision making: Existence and bounds. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meeting, Washington, DC.
46.
Schumpeter, J. A.1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Scott, J.1991. Social network analysis: A handbook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
48.
Shane, S.2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11: 448–469.
49.
Shane, S. A., & Venkataraman, S.2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25: 217–226.
50.
Shepherd, D. A.1999. Venture capitalists’ assessment of new venture survival. Management Science, 45: 621–632.
51.
Shepherd, D. A., & Levesque, M.2002. A search strategy for assessing a business opportunity. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(2): 140–154.
52.
Shepherd, D. A., & Zacharakis, A.1997. Conjoint analysis: A window of opportunity for entrepreneurship research. In J. Katz (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 203–248). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
53.
Summer, C. E., Bettis, R. A., Duhaime, I. H., Grant, J. H., Hambrick, D. C., Snow, C. C., & Zeithaml, C. P.1990. Doctoral education in the field of business policy and strategy. Journal of Management, 16: 361–398.
54.
Venkataraman, S.1997. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
55.
West, G. P., III. 1997. Frameworks for research and theory development in entrepreneurship. In L. N. Dosier & J. B. Keys (Eds.), Academy of management best papers proceedings (pp. 113–117). Statesboro, GA: Georgia Southern University.
56.
West, G. P., III, & Meyer, G. D.1997. Temporal dimensions of opportunistic change in technology-based ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(2): 31–52.
57.
Wiseman, R. W., & Skilton, P. F.1999. Divisions and differences: Exploring publication preferences and productivity across management subfields. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8: 299–320.
58.
Zacharakis, A. L., & Meyer, G. D.1998. A lack of insight: Do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process?Journal of Business Venturing, 13: 57–76.
