BorrasC., 1997. Organization Development, Quality Assurance and Radiation Protection in Radiology Services: Imaging and Radiation Therapy. Pan American Health Organization - World Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
2.
FaulknerK., 1997. Radiation protection in interventional radiology. Brit. J. Radiol. 70, 325–364.
3.
FaulknerK., 1992. Personal monitoring during fluoroscopy. J. Radiol. Prot. 12, 225–231.
4.
FaulknerK.MarshallN.W., 1993. The relationship of effective dose to personnel monitor reading for simulated fluoroscopic irradiation conditions. Health Phys. 64, 502–508.
5.
GillJ.R., 1992. Overexposure of patients due to malfunctions or defects in radiation equipment. Rad. Prot. Dosim. 43, 257–260.
6.
ICRP (1991), 1990. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60, Annals of the ICRP 21(1–3).
7.
IEC, 2000. Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 2–43: Particular Requirements for the Safety of X-Ray Equipment for Interventional Procedures. IEC 60601–2-43 Ed.1. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.
8.
IPEM, 1996. Measurement of the Performance Characteristics of Diagnostic X-Ray Systems. Report 32, Parts I-VI. Institute of Physicists and Engineers in Medicine, York, UK.
9.
MarshallN.W.FaulknerK., 1992. The dependence of the scattered radiation dose to personnel on technique factors in diagnostic radiology. Brit. J. Radiol. 65, 44–49.
10.
MarshallN.W.FaulknerK., 1995. Optimization of personnel shielding in interventional radiology. In: FaulknerK.TeunenD. (Eds.) Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology. Brit. Inst. Radiol., London, UK, pp. 29–34.
11.
MarshallN.W.FaulknerK.ClarkeP., 1992. An investigation into the effect of protective devices on the dose to radiosensitive organs in the head and neck. Brit. J. Radiol65, 799–802.
12.
NCRP, 1989. Exposure of the US Population from Diagnostic Medical Radiation. NCRP Report No. 100. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, USA.
13.
NCRP, 1995. Use of Personal Monitors to Estimate Effective Dose Equivalent and Effective Dose to Workers for External Exposure to Low-LET Radiation. NCRP Report No. 122. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, USA.
14.
UNSCEAR, 1988. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 1988 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. UN Publication Sales No. E.88.IX.7. United Nations, New York, NY, USA.
15.
VañoE.ArranzL.SastreJ.M., 1998a. Dosimetric and radiation protection considerations based on some cases of patient skin injuries in interventional cardiology. Brit. J. Radiol. 71, 510–516.
16.
VañoE.GonzálezL.BeneytezF., 1998b. Lens injuries induced by occupational exposure in non-optimised interventional radiology laboratories. Brit. J. Radiol. 71, 728–733.
17.
VetterS.FaulknerK.StrecherE.P., 1998. Dose reduction and image quality in pulsed fluoroscopy. Rad. Prot. Dosim. 80, 299–302.
18.
WagnerL.K.ArcherB.R., 1998. Minimising Risks from Fluoroscopic X Rays. A Credentialing Program. 2nd Edition. PartnershipR.M., 3 E Wedgemere Circle, The Woodlands, TX, USA.
19.
WagnerL.K.ArcherB.R., 2000. Management of patient skin dose in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. J. Vasc. Intervent. Radiol. 11, 25–34.
20.
WHO (in press). Manual on Radiation Protection in Hospitals and General Practice. Vol. 2: Diagnostic Radiology. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
21.
WHO-ISH (1997). Joint WHO/ISH Workshop on Efficacy and Radiation Safety in Interventional Radiology. BfS-ISH-Berichte 178. World Health Organization and Institute of Radiation Hygiene of the German Federal Office of Radiation Protection, printed by Institut fur Strahlenhygiene, Neuherberg, Germany
00008-2_summary.png)