Using survey data from the Netherlands, we find that Muslims have relatively high levels of religious philanthropic behavior and relatively low levels of secular philanthropic behavior, whereas Hindus have relatively low levels of religious philanthropic behavior and higher levels of secular philanthropic behavior. Results indicate that the community explanation and the conviction explanation of the relationship between religion and philanthropic behavior are both valid to some extent when it comes to differences in philanthropic behavior between Christians, Muslims, and Hindus. In addition, we find a relationship between group orientation in worship rituals on the relation between religion and philanthropic behavior. The more group-oriented the worship rituals, the stronger the relation between religion and philanthropic behavior. The results suggest that Durkheim's theory (La Suicide: Etude de Sociologie. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1897) may only be valid in a Christian context.
AltermanJBHunterSThe idea of philanthropy in Muslim context2004WashingtonCSIS
2.
AlwinDFFamily of origin and cohort differences in verbal abilityAmerican Sociological Review199156625–63810.2307/2096084
3.
Anand, P. 2003. Hindu Diaspora and Religious Philanthropy in the United States. Paper presented at the 6th International Society for Third Sector Research, Toronto, Canada.
4.
Arts, K. 2009. Ontwikkeling in Kerkelijkheid en Kerkbezoek 1999–2008. In Religie aan het Begin van de 21e Eeuw. Den Haag/Heerlen: CBS.
5.
BeckerJDe HartJGodsdienstige Veranderingen in Nederland2006The HagueSCP
6.
BekkersRTraditional and health-related philanthropy: The role of resources and personalitySocial Psychology Quarterly20064349–36610.1177/019027250606900404
7.
BekkersRSchuytTNMAnd who is your neighbour? Explaining denominal differences in charitable giving and volunteering in the NetherlandsReview of Religious Research200850174–96
8.
Bekkers, R., and Wiepking, P. 2007. Generosity and philanthropy: A literature review (October 28, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1015507.
9.
BergerIThe influence of religion on philanthropy in CanadaVoluntas2006172114–13210.1007/s11266-006-9007-3
10.
BowenKReligion, participation, and charitable giving: A report1999TorontaVolunteer Canada & the Canadian Center for Philanthropy
11.
BradyHEVerbaSScholzmanKLProspecting for participants: Rational expectations and the recruitment of political activistsAmerican Political Science Review199993153–16910.2307/2585767
12.
Carabain, C.L., and R. Bekkers 2009. Charitable giving by Immigrants in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the Giving and Volunteering Research Conference 2009, VU University, Amsterdam.
13.
CarabainCLBekkersRReligious and secular volunteering: A comparison between immigrants and non-immigrants in the NetherlandsVoluntary Sector Review20112123–4110.1332/204080511X560602
14.
CBSEnquêteonderzoek onder allochtonen2005Problemen en Oplossingen. Voorburg/HeerlenCBS
15.
ChavesMFinancing American religionNew Directions in Philanthropic Fundraising20023541–5410.1002/pf.3504
16.
CnaanRAKaternaiksAWineburgRJReligious people, religious congregations, and volunteerism in human services: Is there a link?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly19932233–5410.1177/089976409302200104
17.
DurkheimRLa Suicide: Etude de Sociologie1897ParisPresses Universitaires de France
GesthuizenMKraaykampGVerbal ability of low-educated people in the Netherlands: The downside of educational expansionThe Netherlands’ Journal of Social Sciences200238191–211
20.
Gijsberts, M., and H. Schmeets. 2008. Sociaal-Culturele oriëntatie en maatschappelijke participatie. In Jaarrapport Integratie 2008, ed. Oudhof, K., R. van der Vliet, and B. Hermans. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
21.
Giving in the Netherlands Immigrant Survey (GINIS): 2006–2008. [machine-readable data file]. Carabain, Christine L.; Bekkers, René. [principle investigator(s)]. Amsterdam: VU University, Philanthropic Studies [distributor].
22.
Hartgers, M. 2008. Onderwijs. In Jaarrapport Integratie 2008, ed. Oudhof, K., R. van der Vliet, and B. Hermans. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
23.
HogeDRIntroduction: The problem of understanding church givingReview of Religious Research199436101–11010.2307/3511402
24.
IannacconeLRSkewness explained: A rational choice model of religious givingJournal of the Scientific study of Religion1997362141–15710.2307/1387549
25.
JosephJARemaking America: How benevolent traditions of many cultures are transforming our national life1995San FranciscoJossey-Bass
26.
Kullberg, J. 2007. Fysieke en Sociale kwaliteit van wonen in en buiten concentratiewijken. In Jaarrapport Integratie 2007. ed. Dagevos, J. and M. Gijsberts. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
27.
MusickMAWilsonJVolunteers: A social profile2008Bloomington, INIndiana University Press
28.
OsiliUODuDImmigrant assimilation and charitable givingNew directions for Philanthropic Fundraising20054889–10410.1002/pf.108
29.
PresserSStinsonMData collection mode and social desirability bias in self-reported religious attendanceAmerican Sociological Review199863137–14510.2307/2657486
30.
RooneyPSteinbergKSchervishPA methodological comparison of giving surveys: Indiana as a test caseNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly200130551–56810.1177/0899764001303011
31.
Schmeets, H., and S. te Riele. 2009. Religie in het perspectief van sociale samenhang. In Religie aan het Begin van de 21eEeuw. Den Haag/Heerlen: CBS.
32.
SenturkOFCharity in Islam: A comprehensive guide to zakat2007Somerset, NJThe Light, Inc
33.
SmithCEmersonMOSnellPPassing the plate. Why American Christians don't give away more money2008Oxford; New YorkOxford University Press
34.
Van den Brakel., M, L. Moonen, and M. Wageveld. 2008. Inkomen en Uitkeringen. In Jaarrapport Integratie 2008. ed. Oudhof, K., R., van der Vliet, and B. Hermans. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
35.
Van der Bie, R. 2009. Kerkelijkheid en Kerkelijke Diversiteit 1889–2008. In Religie aan het Begin van de 21e Eeuw. Den Haag/Heerlen: CBS.
36.
Van Herten, M. 2009. Het aantal Islamieten in Nederland. In Religie aan het Begin van de 21eEeuw. Den Haag/Heerlen: CBS
37.
Van TubergenFTe GrotenhuisMUlteeWDenomination, religious context, and suicide: Neo-Durkheim multilevel explanations tested with individual and contextual dataAmerican Journal of Sociology2005111797–82310.1086/497307
38.
VermeulenHPennixRImmigrant Integration: The Dutch case2000AmsterdamHet Spinhuis
39.
WinshipCRadbillLSampling weights and regression analysisSociological Methods & Research1994232230–25710.1177/0049124194023002004
40.
WuthnowRActs of compassion: Caring for others and helping ourselves1991Princeton, NJPrinceton University Press
