Scholars of race tend to measure racial inequality in either absolute or relative terms. How much Blacks have advanced from their historical antebellum status is an absolute measure. How the status of Blacks compares with that of Whites is a relative measure. A more revealing measure might be how much racial equality will be strategically necessary to avoid a major politico-economic crisis like the ones that occurred during the civil war and the 1960s. Though it is easier to measure absolute or relative equality, measures of strategic equality yeild more important information. Using the Current Population Survey, General Social Survey, Center for Education Statistics, Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality, and Census Bureau estimates, I find that, strategically, America is actually declining in racial equality, not advancing.
BarreraM.Race and class in the southwest: a theory of racial inequality.Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press; 1979.
2.
BertrandM., MullainathanS.Are Emily and Brendan more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Am Econ Rev.2004; 94: 991–1014.
3.
BlanckP.D.The appearance of justice revistited. J Crim Law and Criminol.1996; 86(3): 887–927.
4.
BoboL.D., and CharlesC.Z.Race in the American mind: from the Moynihan report to the Obama candidacy. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci.2009; 243–259.
5.
Bonilla-SilvaE.Rethinking racism: toward a structural interpretation. Am Sociol Rev.1996; 62: 465–80.
6.
Bonilla-SilvaE.Racism without racists: color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States.New York: Rowman and Littlefield; 2003.
7.
Bonilla-SilvaE., FormanT.A.‘I am not a racist but…’: Mapping white college students' racial ideology in the USA. Discourse Soc.2000; 11: 50–85.
8.
ColemanM.G.African American popular wisdom versus the qualification question: Is affirmative action merit-based. West J Black Stud.2003; 27: 35–44.
9.
ColemanM.G.Strategic equality and the failure of affirmative action law. Int J Discrimination Law.2012 (March)
10.
ColemanM.G., DarityW.A.Jr, SharpeR.V.Are claims of discrimination valid?: Considering the moral hazard effect. Am J Econ Sociol.2008; 67: 1–19.
11.
FeaginJ.R.Racist America: roots, current realities, and future reparations.New York: Routledge; 2010.
12.
GallupG.H.The Gallup poll: public opinion 1935—-1971.New York: Random House; 1972.
13.
HewittC.The effect of political democracy and social democracy on equality in industrial societies: a cross-national comparison. Am Sociol Rev.1977; 42(3): 450–64.
14.
JencksC.Rethinking social policy: race poverty and the underclass.Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1992.
15.
JungF., UweS.Income, inequality, and the stability of democracy—another look at the Lipset hypothesis. Eur J Polit Econ.2014; 35: 52–74.
16.
KingM.L.JrWhere do we go from here: chaos or community.Boston: Beacon; 1968.
17.
LeibfriedS., SteffenM.Introduction to welfare states: construction, deconstruction, reconstruction. Welfare states: construction, deconstruction, reconstruction. In: LeibfriedS., MauS., editors. Analytical approaches, vol. 1. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2008. p. 11–63.
18.
LeiterW.M., LeiterS.Affirmative action in antidiscrimination law and policy: an overview and synthesis.Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 2011.
19.
MeyersonA., FrancM.G., GazianoT.Alternatives to racial preferences.Washington DC: The Heritage Foundation; 1998.
20.
MilesR.Racism.London: Routledge; 1989.
21.
Multi-City, Study.Multi-city study of urban inequality, household survey. 1998.
22.
QuillianL.New approaches to understanding racial prejudice and discrimination. Annu Rev Sociol.2006; 32: 299–328.
23.
RobinsonR.The debt: what America owes to Blacks.New York: Plume; 2000.
24.
SkrentnyJ.D.The ironies of affirmative action.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1996.
25.
SmithT.W., MarsdenP.V., HoutM., and KimJ.General social surveys, 1972–2012. [machine-readable data file]. In: Principal investigator, Smith TW; Co-principal investigators, MarsdenP.V., and HoutM., NORC, editors. Chicago: national opinion research center, producer, 2005. Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut; 2013.
26.
SnowdenF.M.JrBlacks in antiquity: Ethiopians in the Greco-Roman experience.Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1970.
27.
SnowdenF.M.JrBefore color prejudice: the ancient view of blacks.Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1983.
28.
The New Oxford American Dictionary. In: JewellE.J., and AbateF.R., editors. Oxford; 2005.
29.
ThurowL.C.Poverty and discrimination.Washington DC: The Brookings Institution; 1969.
TurnerM.A., FixM., StruykR.J.Opportunities denied, opportunities diminished: racial discrimination in hiring.Washington DC: The Urban Institute Press; 1991.
32.
VacaN.C.The presumed alliance: the unspoken conflict between Latinos and Blacks and what it means for America.New York: Haper Collins; 2004.
33.
WickerT.Introduction to the 1988 edition. The Kerner report: The 1968 report of the national advisory commission on civil disorders.New York: Pantheon; 1988. p. 12–4.
34.
WilsonW.J.Power, racism, and privilege: race relations in theoretical and sociohistorical perspectives.New York: Free Press; 1973.
35.
YingerJ.Closed doors, opportunities lost: the continuing costs of housing discrimination.New York: Russell Sage; 1995.
