Marcus Alexis was a major contributor to the debate on deregulation of the surface transportation industry. He hypothesized that easing restrictions on rate-setting and firm-entry would promote efficiency and enhance consumer welfare in trucking and railroad industries. As commissioner and interim chairman of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) he supported legislation that opened these industries to greater competition. This study revisits the model used by Alexis to derive his hypothesis, and uses current information to test its predictive accuracy long after the initial passage of deregulation. Findings from this study are consistent with Alexis’ forecast. Such evidence of his research expertise is just part of his legacy as a pioneer in the economics profession.
AlexisM.The applied theory of regulation: political economy at the Interstate Commerce Commission.Public Choice.1982; 9(1): 5–27.
2.
AlexisM.Commentary on earnings and employment in trucking: deregulating a naturally competitive industry. In: PeoplesJ., editor. Regulatory reform and labor markets.Boston: Kluwer; 1998. p. 125–53.
3.
AschP., SenecaR.Government and the market place.New York: Dryden; 1985.
4.
BereskinC.G.Regulation, deregulation and reregulation in the surface transportation industry. In Transportation in the New Millennium.Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute Press; 1995.
ChowG.US and Canadian trucking policy. In: KennethB., PitfieldD., editors. Transportation deregulation: an international movement.London: MacMillan Academic and Professional Ltd; 1991.
7.
DempseyP.The rise and fall of the interstate commerce commission: the tortuous path from regulation to deregulation of America's infrastructure.Marquette Law Rev.2012; 95: 1151–89.
8.
GrimmC., WindleR.F.Regulation and deregulation in surface freight, airlines and telecommunications. In: JamesP., editor. Regulatory reform and labor markets.Boston: Kluwer; 1998. p. 15–49.
9.
HirschB.T., MacphersonD.A.Earnings and employment in trucking: deregulating a naturally competitive industry. In: JamesP., editor. Regulatory reform and labor markets.Boston; Dordrecht and London: Kluwer; 1998.
PeltzmanS.Toward a more general theory of regulation.J Law Econ.1976; 19(2): 211–40.
16.
PeoplesJ.Deregulation and the labor market.J Econ Perspect.1998; 12(3): 111–30.
17.
PeoplesJ.Industry performance following reformation of economic and social regulation in the trucking industry. In: BelmanD., WhiteC.III, editors. Trucking in the age of information.Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing; 2005.
18.
PeoplesJ.The legacy of the Interstate Commerce Act and Labor: legislation, unionization, and labor earnings in surface transportation services.Rev Ind Organ.2013; 33: 319–38.
19.
PhillipsB., PhillipsL.Research Politics, and the Dynamics of Policy Development. A Case Study of Motor Carrier Reform.Policy Sci.1984; 17: 367–84.
20.
RobinsonA.Turnover at the postal regulatory commission.Courier, Express and Postal Observer2001.
21.
StiglerG.The theory of economic regulation.Bell J Econ.1971; 2: 3–21.
22.
StoneR.Nevada fats and the gang of three: the Interstate Commerce Commission under the chairmanship of Reese H. Taylor, 1981–1985.7th Marketing History Conference.1995; 7: 131–7.
23.
TalleyW., Schwarz-MillerA.Railroad deregulation and union labor earnings. In: PeoplesJ., editor. Regulatory reform and labor markets.Boston: Kluwer; 1998. p. 125–53.
24.
TiroleJ.The theory of industrial organization.Cambridge Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1988.
25.
VachalK.“The Interstate Commerce Commission: past and present,” working paper, North Dakota State University. 1993.
26.
WinstonC.U.S. industry adjustment to economic deregulation.J Econ Perspect.1998; 12(3): 89–110.
27.
YingJ.S.The inefficiency of regulating a competitive industry: productivity gains in trucking following reform.Rev Econ Stat.1990; 72(2): 191–201.
