High technology industries employ higher than average numbers of scientists and engineers when compared to the employment of the same group among all industries. Since these jobs require high levels of skills to undertake creative, cutting edge activities, it is anticipated that employment in these industries will be largely based on the levels of human capital of individuals or merit. This study compares how changes in levels of educational attainment affect employment in science and engineering jobs in high technology industries with those outside for four racial and ethnic groups. Although blacks and Hispanics are under-represented in science and engineering occupations, the study finds that the effects of education vary with the level of education, race/ethnicity, and the industry/occupational group under consideration in ways that suggest that the race/ethnicity of an individual still plays an important role in determining employment.
ArrowK.J.Higher education as a filter.J Public Econ.1973; 2(3): 193–216.
2.
BaezB.Affirmative action and the politics of diversity.J High Educ.2003; 94(1): 96–107.
3.
BeckerG.S.Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis.J Polit Econ.1962; 70(5): 9–49.
4.
BeckerG.S.Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. 2nd ed.New York: National Bureau of Economic Research;1975.
5.
BeckerG.S.The economics of discrimination.2nd ed. (ed) Economics research studies of the economics research center of the University of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1971.
6.
BurdettK.The testing and sorting functions of higher education. Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper.Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison; 1976.
7.
ChappleK., MarkusenA., SchrockG., YamamotoD., YuP.Gauging metropolitan “high-tech” and “I-tech” activity.Econ Dev Q.2004; 18(1): 10–29.
ConradC.A.African-Americans in high-tech jobs: trends and disparities in 25 cities.Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.2006.
10.
DarityW.The functionality of market-based discrimination.Int J Soc Econ.2001; 28(10/11/12): 980–6.
11.
de los SantosA.Latino achievement in the sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics.J Hisp High Educ.2006; 5(3): 200–2.
12.
DietteTM.The algebra obstacle: access, race and the math achievement gap (Dissertation).2005.
13.
EscobarI., PickettM., SchallC., ColemanM.Engineering for Teachers of migrant students (ETMS).Environ Eng Sci.2006; 23(3): 472–8.
14.
FieldsC.Black scientists: a history of exclusion.Black Issues High Educ.1998; 15(3): 12–7.
15.
GatchairS.Representation and reward in high technology industries and occupations: the influence of race and ethnicity (Dissertation).2007.
16.
GrahamJ.W., SmithS.A.Looking for the next George Washington Carver: explaining racial difference in employment and earnings in science and engineering in the United States.Rev Black Polit Econ.2004; 32(1): 65–82.
17.
GrodskyE., PagerD.The structure of disadvantage: individual and occupational determinants of the black-white wage gap.Am Econ Rev.2001; 66(4): 542–67.
18.
HeckerD.High technology employment: a broader view.Monthly Labor Review. June. 1999.
19.
KlopfensteinK.Beyond test scores: the impact of Black teacher role models on rigorous math taking.Contemp Econ Policy.2005; 23(3): 416–28.
20.
LeslieL.L., McClureG.T., OaxacaR.L.Women and minorities in science and engineering.J High Educ.1998; 69(3): 239–76.
21.
LundmarkC.Undergraduate mentoring program targets hard-to-find students.Bioscience.2004; 54(1): 15.
22.
MincerJ.Investment in human capital and personal income distribution.J Polit Econ.1958; 66(4): 281–302.
23.
MincerJ.1974. Schooling, Experience and Earnings.New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
National Science Board.Science and engineering indicators report: volume 1, NSB06–01; Chapter 3 Science and engineering labor force. edited by N. S. Foundation. Arlington VA. 2006.
NCES.Status and trends in the Education of Blacks. edited by N. C. f. E. Statistics: US Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences. 2003.
27.
NSF.Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and enginering, NSF 03–312.Arlington: National Science Foundation; 2002.
28.
NSF. In: FoundationN. S., editor. Women, minorities and persons with disabilities in science and engineering.Arlington: National Science Foundation; 2004.
29.
RileyJ.G.Silver signals: twenty-five years of screeing and signaling.J Econ Lit.2001; 39(2): 432–78.
30.
SchultzT.W.Investment in human capital.Am Econ Rev.1962; 51(1): 1–17.
31.
ScottA.J.Low-wage workers in a high-technology manufacturing complex - the Southern Californian electronics assembly industry.Urban Stud.1992; 29(8): 1231–46.
32.
SorgeC., NewsomH.E., HagertyJ.J.Fun is not enough: attitudes of Hispanic middle school students toward science and scientists.Hisp J Behav Sci.2000; 22(3): 332.
33.
SpenceM.Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets.Am Econ Rev.2002; 92(3): 432–59.
34.
SummersM.F., HrabowskiF.A.Preparing minority scientists and engineers.Science.2006; 311(5769): 1870–1.
35.
TangJ.Evidence for and against the 'double penalty’ thesis in the science and engineering fields.Popul Res Policy Rev.1997; 16(4): 337–62.
36.
TangJ.Doing engineering: the career attainment and mobility of Caucasian, Black and Asian-American engineers.Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2000.
37.
ThomasG.E.Participation and degree attainment of African-American and Latino students in graduate education relative to other racial and ethnic groups: an update from Office of Civil Rights Data.Harv Educ Rev.1992; 62(1): 45.
38.
Tomaskovic-DeveyD.Gender and racial inequality at work: the sources and consequences of job segregation, Cornell studies in industrial and labor relations.Ithaca: ILR Press; 1993.
39.
TysonK., DarityW., CastellinoD.R.It's not a “Black thing”: understanding the burden of being white and other dilemmas.Am Sociol Rev.2005; 70(4): 582–605.
40.
WeissA.Human capital vs. signaling perspectives of wages.J Econ Perspec.1995; 9(4): 133–54.
41.
WilsonW.When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor.New York: Knopf;1996.
42.
YoungH.Secondary education systemic issues: addressing possible contributors to a leak in the science education pipeline and potential solutions.J Sci Educ Technol.2005; 14(2): 205–16.
