This paper examines factors that influence individuals' time use decisions regarding food preparation. Using American Time Use Survey data, Tobit estimates confirm that time spent on food preparation differs by race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. In general, hours worked, age, and education are negatively associated with time spent preparing food-cooked-at-home, while family care and leisure time are positively associated with it. Time spent purchasing prepared-food, on the other hand, has a positive relation to hours worked, family care, leisure time, education, and income, although its effects significantly differ by race and ethnicity. Estimates further show a positive relationship between time spent preparing food-cooked-at-home and family size, supporting the Barten theory of scale economies in home production.
AguiarM., HurstE.Measuring trends in leisure: the allocation of time over five decades.Q J Econ.2007; 122(3): 969–1006.
2.
AguiarM., HurstE.Consumption versus expenditure.J Polit Econ.2005; 113(5): 919–48.
3.
BahloulJ.From a Muslim banquet to a Jewish seder: Foodways and Ethnicity among North African Jews.Jew among Arabs: Contacts and boundaries.CohenM.R., UdovitchA.L. editors. Princeton, NJ: Darwin; 1989. p. 85–96.
4.
BartemA.P.Family composition, prices and expenditure patterns.Econometric analysis for national economic planning. HartP.E., WhitakerJ.K. editors. London: Butterworths; 1964.
5.
BeckerG.S.A theory of the allocation of time.Econ J.1965; 75(299): 493–517.
6.
BianchiS.M., RobinsonJ.What did you do today? Children's use of time, family composition, and the acquisition of social capital.J Marriage Fam.1997; 59: 332–44.
7.
BlockG., RosenbergerW.F., PattersonB.H.Calories, fat and cholesterol: intake patterns in the US population by race, sex and age.Am J Public Health.1988; 78(9): 1150–5.
8.
BlisardW.N., LinB-H, CromartieJ., BallengerN.America's changing appetite: food consumption and spending to 2020. United States department of agriculture.Food Rev.2002; 25(1): 1–9.
9.
ChiswickB.R.Differences in education and earnings across racial and ethnic groups: tastes, discrimination, and investments in child quality.Q J Econ.1988; 103(3): 571–97.
10.
CowlesM.L., DietzR.P.Time spent in homemaking activities by a selected group of Wisconsin farm homemakers.J Home Econ.1956; 48(1): 29–34.
11.
DeatonA., PaxsonC.Engel's What? A response to Gan and Vernon.J Polit Econ.2003; 111(6): 1378–81.
12.
DeatonA., PaxsonC.Economies of scale, household size, and the demand for food.J Polit Econ.1998; 106(5): 897–930.
13.
DickinsD.Time activities in homemaking.Mississippi state college agricultural experiment station bulletin 424, October 1945.
14.
Diez-RouxA.V., NietoF.J., CaulfieldL., TyrolerH.A.Watson MS.Neighborhood differences in diet: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.1999; 53: 55–63.
15.
DeVaultM.L.Ethnicity and expertise: racial-ethnic knowledge in sociological research.Gend Soc.1995; 9(5): 612–31.
16.
EllawayA., MacintyreS.Does where you live predict health related behaviours? A case study in Glasgow.Health Bull.1996; 54(6): 443–6.
17.
Fabre-VassasC.The singular beast: Jews, Christians and the pig. Translated by C. Volk.New York: Columbia University Press; 1997.
18.
FloroM.S., MilesM.Time use, work and overlapping activities: evidence from Australia.Camb J Econ.2003; 27(6): 881–904.
19.
ForsythA., MacintyreS., AndersonA.S.Diets for disease? intraurban variation in reported food consumption in Glasgow.Appetite.1994; 22: 259–74.
20.
FosuA.K.Racial and gender differences in unemployment patterns in an urban labor market: the case of Detroit.Rev Black Polit Econ.2000; 27(3): 35–47.
21.
GibsonJ., KimB.Measurement error in recall surveys and the relationship between household size and food demand.Am J Agric Econ.2007; 89(2): 473–89.
22.
GibsonJ.Why does the engel method work? food demand, economies of scale and household survey method.Oxford Bull Econ Stat.2002; 64(4): 341–59.
23.
GlanzK., BasilM., MaibachE., GoldbergJ., SnyderD.Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption.J Am Diet Assoc.1998; 98(10): 1118–26.
24.
GlanzK., KristalR.E., DiClementeC.C., HeimendingerJ., LinnanL., McLerranD.F.Stages of change in adopting healthy diets: fat, fiber, and correlates of nutrient intake.Health Educ Q.1994; 21(4): 499–519.
25.
GanL., VernonV.Testing the Barten model of economies of scale in household consumption: toward resolving a paradox of Deaton and Paxson.J Polit Econ.2003; 111(6): 1361–77.
26.
HirschmanC.The origins and demise of the concept of race.Popul Dev Rev.2004; 30(3): 385–415.
27.
HortonS., CampbellC.Wife's employment, food expenditures, and apparent nutrient intake: evidence from Canada.Am J Agric Econ.1991; 73(3): 784–94.
28.
KinseyJ.D.Food and families' socioeconomic status.J Nutr.1994; 124: 1878S–85.
29.
KristalA.R., PattersonR.E., GlanzK., HeimendingerJ., HebertJ.R., FengZ.. Psychosocial correlates of healthful diets: baseline results from the working well study.Prev Med.1995; 24(3): 221–8.
30.
LeedsJ.B.The household budget: with a special inquiry into the amount and value of household work. Ph.D. Dissertation. Columbia University, 1917. Philadelphia: Innes & Sons; 1917.
31.
LoganT.D.Economies of scale in the household: puzzles and patters from the American past. NBER Working Paper No. 13869, Forthcoming Economic Inquiry.
32.
LundbergG.A., KomarovskyM., McInernyM.A.Leisure: a suburban study.New York: Columbia University Press; 1934.
33.
McDonaldJ.F., MoffittR.A.The use of Tobit analysis.Rev Econ Stat.1980; 62(2): 318–21.
34.
MancinoL., NewmanC.Who has time to cook?: how family resources influence food preparation.United States Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Report No 40; 2007.
35.
MintzS.W., DuBoisC.M.The anthropology of food and eating.Annu Rev Anthropol.2002; 31: 99–119.
36.
MorlandK., WingS., Diez-RouxA.V., PooleC.Neighborhood characteristics associated with the location of food stores and food service places.Am J Prev Med.2002; 22(1): 23–9.
37.
PattersonB.H., BlockG.Food choices and the cancer guidelines.Am J Public Health.1988; 78(3): 282–6.
38.
PietrykowskiB.You are what you eat: the social economy of the slow food movement.Rev Soc Econ.2004; 62(3): 307–21.
39.
PopkinB.M., Siega-RizA.M., HainesP.S.A comparison of dietary trends among racial and socioeconomic groups in the United States.N Engl J Med.1996; 335(10): 716–20.
40.
ProchaskaF.J., SchrimperR.A.Opportunity cost of time and other socioeconomic effects on away-from-home food consumption.Am J Agric Econ.1973; 55(4): 595–603.
41.
RameyV.A.Time spent in home production in the twentieth-century United States: new estimates from old data.J Econ Hist.2009; 69(1): 1–47.
42.
RamezaniC.A., RoederC.Health knowledge and nutritional adequacy of female heads of households in the United States.J Consum Aff.1995; 29(2): 381–402.
43.
RichardsonJ.E.The use of time by rural homemakers in Montana. Montana State College Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 271, February 1933.
44.
StewartH., YenT.S.Changing household characteristics and the away-from-home food market: a censored equation system approach.Food Policy.2004; 29(6): 643–58.
45.
SuttonD.E.Remembrance of repasts: an anthropology of food and memory.Oxford: Berg; 2001. p. 19–42.
46.
ThompsonB., CoronadoG.D., SolomonC.C., McClerranD.F., NeuhouseM.L., FengZ.Cancer prevention behavior and socioeconomic status among Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites in a rural population in the United States.Cancer Causes Control.2002; 13: 719–28.
47.
TobinJ.Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables.Econometrica.1958; 26(1): 24–36.
48.
TurrellG.Structural, material, and economic influences on the food-purchasing choices of socioeconomic groups.Aust N Z J Public Health.1996; 20(6): 611–7.
49.
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. American time use survey activity Lexicon 2005.Washington DC.2006.
50.
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics.Work experience of the population in 2002. USDL 03–911. Washington, D.C.2003.
51.
United States Department of Agriculture.Agricultural research administration. Bureau of human nutrition and home economics. The time costs of homemaking—a study of 1,500 Rural and Urban Households. 1944.
52.
WilkR.R.“Rea; Belizean Food”: building local identity in the transnational Caribbean.Am Anthropol.1999; 101(2): 244–55.
53.
WilliamsD.R., CollinsC.US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations.Annu Rev Sociology.1995; 21: L349–89.
