Since the early 1990s, credit expanded relative to income, especially after 2001. It is hypothesized that traditionally uneven credit access and gaps in the costs of credit by demographic characteristics shrank during this period. Relying on data from the Federal Reserve's Survey of Consumer Finance, this study looks at financial constraints, the costs of credit and a number of contributions to the costs of credit, including sources and types of loans. The results indicate that taste-based discrimination and structural discrimination may have persisted and possibly increased over time. Gaps in credit access and costs of credit have widened by race, remained high by income, but shrank by ethnicity. Part of the overall differences in credit access was a varying reliance on professional information when making decisions on debt.
AkhigbeA., MaduraJ.Bank acquisitions of security firms: the early evidence.Appl Financ Econ.2004; 14(7): 485–96.
2.
AkhigbeA., MaduraJ., WhyteA.M.Partial anticipation and the gains to bank merger targets.J Financ Serv Res.2004; 26(1): 55–71.
3.
Al MamunA., HassanM.K., KarelsG.V., MaroneyN.financial services modernization act of 1999: market assessment of winners and losers in the insurance industry.J Insur Issues.2005; 28(1): 103–28.
4.
AusubelL.Credit card defaults, credit card profits, and bankruptcy.Am Bankruptcy Law J.1997; 71: 249–70.
5.
AveryR.B., SamolykK.A.Bank consolidation and small business lending: the role of community banks.J Financ Serv Res.2004; 25(2–3): 291–325.
6.
BarrM.Five opportunities for the Bush administration and the 107th Congress.Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy; 2001.
7.
BatesT.financing the development of urban minority communities: lessons of history.Econ Dev Q.2000; 14(3): 227–41.
8.
BeckerG.The economics of discrimination, Rev. Ed. 1971. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1957.
9.
BergerA.N.The economic effects of technological progress: evidence from the banking industry.J Money, Credit Bank.2003; 35(2): 141–76.
10.
BirdE.J., HagstromP.A., WildR.Credit card debts of the poor: high and rising.J Policy Anal Manage.1999; 18(1): 125–33.
11.
BlackS., MorganD.Meet the new borrowers.Current Issues in Economics and Finance.1999; 5(3): 1–6.
12.
BlanchflowerD.G., LevineP.B., ZimmermanD.J.Discrimination in the small-business credit market.Rev Econ Stat.2003; 85(4): 930–43.
13.
BloemenH.G., StancanelliE.G.F.Financial wealth, consumption smoothing and income shocks arising from job loss.Economica.2005; 72(287): 431–52.
14.
BocianD., ErnstK., LiW.Unfair lending: The effect of race and ethnicity on the price of subprime mortgages.Durham, NC: Center for Responsible Lending; 2006.
15.
BosticR., MehrenH., PaulsonA., SaidenbergM.Regulatory incentives and consolidation: The case of commercial bank mergers and the community reinvestment act. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Working Paper Series WP-02-06. Chicago, IL: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; 2002.
16.
CannerG.B., PassmoreW., SmithD.Residential lending to low-income and minority families: evidence from the 1992 HMDA data.Fed Reserve Bull.1994; 80(2): 79–109.
17.
CarowK.A., KaneE.J., NarayananR.P.How have borrowers fared in banking megamergers?J Money, Credit Bank.2006; 38(3): 821–36.
18.
CavalluzzoK.S., CavalluzzoL.C.Market structure and discrimination: the case of small businesses.J Money, Credit Bank.1998; 30(4): 771–92.
19.
CavalluzzoK., WolkenJ.small business loan turndowns, personal wealth, and discrimination.J Bus.2005; 78(6): 2153–77.
20.
CavalluzzoK.S., CavalluzzoL.C., WolkenJ.D.Competition, small business financing, and discrimination: evidence from a new survey.J Bus.2002; 75(4): 641–76.
21.
Center for Responsible Lending. Race matters: The concentration of payday lenders in African-American neighborhoods in North Carolina.Durham, NC: CRL; 2005.
22.
Center for Responsible Lending. Financial quicksand: Payday lending sinks borrowers in debt with $4.2 billion in predatory fees every year.Durham, NC: CRL; 2006.
23.
ChakravartyS.Relationships and rationing in consumer loans: Evidence from the nineties.Purdue University, Purdue, IN: Department of Economics; 2002. Working Paper No. 38.
24.
ChoudhuryS.Racial and ethnic differences in wealth and asset choices.Social Secur Bull.2002; 64(4): 1–15.
25.
Consumer Federation of America.The growth of legal loan sharking: A report on the payday loan industry.Washington, D.C.: Consumer Federation of America; 1998.
26.
Consumer Federation of America.Safe harbor for usury: Recent developments in payday lending.Washington, D.C.: Consumer Federation of America; 1999.
27.
Consumer Union. Payday lenders burden working families and the U.S. Armed Forces.Washington, DC: CU; 2003.
28.
CrookJ.Credit constraints and US families.Appl Financ Econ.1996; 6: 477–85.
29.
DubyJ., HalperinE., JamesL.High cost and hidden from view: The $10 billion overdraft loan market. CRL Issue Paper No. 9. Durham, NC: Center for Responsible Lending; 2005.
30.
DymskiG.A.The theory of credit-market redlining and discrimination: an exploration.Rev Black Pol Econ.1995; 23(3): 37–74.
ElyD.P., RobinsonK.J.Consolidation, technology, and the changing structure of bank's small business lending.Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic and Financial Review.2001; 1st Quarter: 23–32.
33.
FishbeinA., WoodallP.Subprime locations: Patterns of geographic disparity in subprime lending.Washington, DC: Consumer Federation of America; 2006.
FoxJ.A., GuyE.Driven into debt: CFA car title loan store and online survey.Washington, DC: Consumer Federation of America; 2005.
36.
FoxJ., BartholomaeS., JinkookL.Building the case for financial education.J Consum Aff.2005; 39(1): 195–214.
37.
GabrielS.A., RosenthalS.S.Credit rationing, race, and the mortgage market.J Urban Econ.1991; 29(3): 371–79.
38.
GravesS., PetersonC.L.Predatory lending and the military: The law and geography of “payday” loans in military towns, unpublished manuscript, University of Florida, College of Law, Gainesville, FL; 2005.
39.
HeinS.E., KochT.W., MacDonaldS.S.On the uniqueness of community banks.FRB Atlanta Econ Rev.2005; 90(2): 15–36.
40.
HilgertM.A., HogarthJ.M., BeverlyS.G.Household financial management: the connection between knowledge and behavior.Fed Reserve Bull.2003; 89(7): 309–22.
41.
HollowayS.R., WylyE.K.“The color of money” expanded: geographically contingent mortgage lending in Atlanta.J Hous Res.2001; 12(1): 55–90.
42.
JamesL., SmithP.Overdraft loans: Survey finds growing problems for consumers, crl issue paper no. 13.Durham, NC: Center for Responsible Lending; 2006.
43.
KruegerD., PerriF.Does income inequality lead to consumption inequality? Evidence and theory, NBER Working Paper No. 9202.Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2002.
44.
LeggettK.J., StrandR.W.Membership growth, multiple membership groups and agency control at credit unions.Rev Financ Econ.2002; 11(1): 37–46.
45.
LyonsA.C.How credit access has changed over time for U.S. families.J Consum Aff.2003; 37(2): 231–55.
46.
LyonsA.C., ScherpfE.Moving from unbanked to banked: evidence from money smart program.Financ Serv Rev.2004; 13(3): 215–31.
47.
LyonsA.C., ChangY., ScherpfE.M.Translating financial education into behavior change for low-income populations.Financ Couns Plan.2006a; 17(2): 27–45.
48.
LyonsA.C., PalmerL., JayaratneK.S.U., ScherpfE.Are we making the grade? A national overview of financial education and program evaluation.J Consum Aff.2006b; 40(2): 208–35.
49.
ManningR.Credit card nation: The consequences of America's addiction to credit.New York: Basic Books; 2000.
50.
MunnellA., BrowneL.E., McEneaneyJ.Mortgage lending in Boston: Interpreting the HMDA data.Am Econ Rev.1996; 86(1): 25–53.
51.
NewmanK., WylyE.K.Geographies of mortgage market segmentation: the case of essex county, New Jersey.Hous Stud.2004; 19(1): 83–83.
52.
RauchJ.H., HendricksonJ.M.Does bank consolidation hurt the small business borrower?Small Bus Econ.2004; 23(3): 219–26.
53.
RhoadesS.A.Bank mergers and banking structure in the U.S., 1980–1998, Staff Study No. 174.Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System; 2000.
54.
RoseJ.T.Interstate banking, bank consolidation, and bank lending to small business.Small Bus Econ.1993; 5(3): 197–206.
55.
RossS.The continuing practice and impact of discrimination.University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT: Department of Economics Working Paper No. 19; 2005.
56.
SchugM.C., NiederjohnM.S., WoodW.C.Your credit counts challenge: a model program for financial education for low and moderate income adults.J Priv Entprs.2006; 21(2): 196–208.
57.
StavinsJ.Credit card borrowing, delinquency, and personal bankruptcy.New England Economic Review.2000; 15–30. July/August.
58.
StegmanM.A., FarisR.Payday lending: a business model that encourages chronic borrowing.Econ Dev Q.2003; 17(1): 8–32.
59.
TanikO.Payday Lenders Target the Military. CRL Issue Paper No. 11. Durham, NC: Center for Responsible Lending; 2005.
60.
TrippJ.D., SmithS.D.U.S. credit union motivation for involvement in the first-mortgage market.J Real Estate Fin Econ.1993; 7(3): 229–36.
61.
U.S. Census Bureau. Income, poverty and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2004. Washington, DC: Census; 2005.
62.
U.S. Department of Defense.Report on predatory lending practices directed at members of the Armed Forces and their families.Washington, DC: DOD; 2006.
63.
WeinbergJ.A.Borrowing by U.S. families.FRB Richmond Econ Qrtly.2006; 92(3): 177–94.
64.
WellerC.The end of the great American housing boom, CAP Economic Policy Report.Washington, DC: Center for American Progress; 2006.
65.
WellerC.Access denied: Some families face barriers to credit, CAP economic policy report.Washington, DC: Center for American Progress; 2007.
66.
WellerC.Have differences in credit access diminished in an era of financial market deregulation? forthcoming Review of Social Economy; 2009.
67.
WeilerC., DouglasD.One nation under debt.Challenge.2007; 50(1): 54–75.
68.
WestrichT., BushM.Blindfolded into debt: A comparison of credit card costs and conditions at banks and credit unions.Chicago, IL: Woodstock Institute; 2005.
69.
WheelockD.C., WilsonP.W.Consolidation in US banking: Which banks engage in mergers?Rev Financ Econ.2004; 13(1–2): 7–39.
70.
WhiteL.Financial modernization after Gramm-Leach-Bliley: what about communities?New York University, Leondard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics; 2002. Working Paper No. 02–02.
71.
WylyE.K., HammelD.J.Gentrification, segregation, and discrimination in the American urban system.Environ Plan.2004; 36(7): 1215–41.
72.
YaoR., GutterM.S., HannaS.D.The financial risk tolerance of blacks, hispanics, and whites.Financ Couns Plan.2005; 16(1): 51–62.
73.
YildirimH.S., KwagS.W., CollinsM.An examination of equity market response to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act across commercial banking, investment banking, and insurance firms.J Bus Finance Account.2006; 33(9–10): 1629–49.
74.
YooP.Charging up a mountain of debt: families and their credit cards.Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper #96-015A; 1996.
