Much debate from many political sides has ensued to raise attention to the struggle state legislatures face over school finance issues. This study examines the changes in academic achievement, before and after increases in funding occur, to show that money does matter. The uniqueness of this study is that it examines per pupil funding and academic achievement test scores, Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS), not at the aggregated school district level, but at the neighborhood school level. Using data from Dallas County public schools, we are able to see that even within school districts, as resources increase, achievement improves.
HanushekE.A.The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools. J Econ Lit.1986; 24(3): 1141–77. Sep.
2.
HanushekE.A.School resources and student performance. In: BurtlessG., editor. Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success.Washington, DC: Brookings; 1996. p. 43–73.
3.
HarterE.A.How educational expenditure relate to student achievement: insight from Texas Elementary Schools. J Educ Financ.1999; 24(3): 281–302.
4.
HedgesL.V., GreenwaldR.Have times changed? The relation between school resources and student performance. In: BurtlessG., editor. Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success.Washington D.C.: Brookings; 1996. p. 74–92.
5.
IatarolaP., StiefelL., SchwartzA.E.School performance and resource use: the role of New York City Public School Districts. In: RoelkeC., RiceJ.K., editors. Fiscal policy in urban education.Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age; 2002. p. 93–118.
6.
JudG.D., WattsJ.M.Schools and housing values. Land Econ.1981; 57(3): 459–71. Aug.
7.
KainJ.F., QuigleyJ.M.Housing markets and racial discrimination: a microeconomic analysis.New York: National Bureau of Economic Research; 1975.
8.
LopezO.S.Classroom diversification: a strategic view of educational productivity. Rev Educ Res.2007; 77(1): 28–80. Mar.
9.
LoubertL.The political economy of public school finance.Richardson, Texas: University of Texas at Dallas; 2000. May.
10.
MohrL.B.Impact analysis for program evaluation.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
11.
MurnaneR.J., LevyF.Evidence from fifteen schools in Austin. In: BurtlessG., editor. Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success.Washington, DC: Brookings; 1996. p. 93–6.
12.
San Antonio Independent School District v Rodriguez. U.S. 1; (411).
13.
SmithC.E.Courts and public policy.Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall; 1993.
14.
WalkerB.D., CaseyD.T.The basics of Texas Public School Finance.6th ed.Austin, TX: Texas Association of School Boards; 1996.
