Would Increased National Science Foundation Research Support to Economists at Historically Black College and Universities Increase Their Research Productivity?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2007
Would Increased National Science Foundation Research Support to Economists at Historically Black College and Universities Increase Their Research Productivity?
AgesaJacqueline, GrangerMaury, and PriceGregory N.2000. “Economics Research at Teaching Institutions: Are Historically Black Colleges And Universities Different?”, Southern Economic Journal, 67(2), pp. 427–447.
2.
AgesaJacqueline, GrangerMaury, and PriceGregory N.1998. “Economic Research at Historically Black Colleges and Universities: Rankings and Effects on the Supply of Black Economists”, Review of Black Political Economy, 25(4), pp. 41–54.
3.
ArdsSheila, BrintallMichael, and WoodardMaurice. 1997. “The Road to Tenure and Beyond for African American Political Scientists”, Journal of Negro Education, 66(1), pp. 159–171.
4.
AroraAshish, and GambardellaAlfonso. 1996. “The Impact of NSF Support For Basic Research in Economics”, Working Paper, Heinz School of Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
5.
BodenhornHoward. 1997. “Teachers, and Scholars Too: Economic Scholarship at Elite Liberal Arts Colleges”, Journal of Economic Education, 28(4), pp. 323–336.
6.
von BortkiewiczL.1898. Das Gesetz Der Kleinen Zahlen, Leipzig, Teuber.
7.
CameronColin A., and TrivediPravin K.1990. “Regression-Based Tests for Overdispersion in the Poisson Model”, Journal of Econometrics, 46(3), pp. 347–364.
8.
ChappellWilliam F., KimenyiMwangi S., and MayerWalter J.1990. “A Poisson Probability Model of Entry and Market Structure with an Application to U.S. Industries during 1972–77”, Southern Economic Journal, 56(4), pp. 918–927.
9.
CollinsSusan M.2000. “Minority Groups in the Economics Profession”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), pp. 133–148.
10.
CreamerElizabeth G.1998. “Assessing Faculty Publication Productivity: Issues of Equity.”ASHEERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 26, No. 2. Washington D.C.: The George Washington University Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
11.
EllisonGlenn. 2000. “Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q-r Theory”, Working Paper No. 7895, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
12.
FeinbergRobert M., and PriceGregory N.2004. “The Funding of Economics Research: Does Social Capital Matter for Success at the National Science Foundation?”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), pp. 245–252.
13.
GerberHans U.1992. “From the Generalized Gamma to the Generalized Negative Binomial Distribution”, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 10(4), pp. 303–309.
14.
GreeneWilliam H.2000. Econometric Analysis, 4th edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
15.
HartleyJames. E., and RobinsonMichael D.1997. “Economic Research at National Liberal Arts Colleges: School Rankings”, Journal of Economic Education, 28(4). pp. 337–349.
16.
HausmanJerry, HallBrownwyn H., and GrilichesZvi. 1984. “Econometric Models For Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship”, Econometrica, 52(4), pp. 909–938.
17.
LambertDiane. 1992. “Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression with an Application to Defects in Manufacturing”, Technometrics, 34(1), pp. 1–14.
18.
LevinSharon G., and StephanPaula. 1991. “Research Productivity Over the Life Cycle: Evidence For Academic Scientists”, American Economic Review, 81(1), pp. 114–132.
19.
MichenerRon, and TigheCarla. 1992. “A Poisson Regression Model of Highway Fatalities”, American Economic Review, 82(2), pp. 452–456.
20.
MullahyJohn. 1986. “Specification and Testing of Some Modified Count Data Models”, Journal of Econometrics, 33(3), pp. 341–365.
21.
StephanPaula. 1996. “The Economics of Science”, Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), pp. 1199–1235.
22.
VuongQuang H.1989. “Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses”, Econometrica, 57(2), pp. 307–333.
23.
WachtelHoward. 2000. “How the National Science Foundation Funds Research in Economics”, Challenge, 43(5), pp. 20–30.
24.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Studies, SESTAT: A Tool for Studying Scientists and Engineers in the United States, NSF 99-337, Authors, KannankuttyNirmala, and Keith WilsonR. (Arlington, VA1999).