AmbroseBrent, and WargaA.1996. “Implications of Privatization: The Costs to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” In U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Studies on Privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. May.
2.
AmbroseBrent, and Pennington-CrossAnthony. 1999. “Spatial Variation in Lender Market Shares.” Mimeo.
3.
AveryRobert, BosticRaphael, CalemPaul, and CannerGlenn. 1999. “Trends in Home Purchase Lending: Consolidation and the Community Reinvestment Act.”Federal Reserve Bulletin:81–102.
4.
BoxallPatrick, and SilverJosh. 2000. Performance of the GSEs at the Metropolitan Level.U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. Report
5.
BunceHarold L., ReederWilliam J., and ScheesseleRandall M.1999. “Understanding Consumer Credit and Mortgage Scoring: A Work in Progress at HUD.”Paper presented at the Fannie Mae Foundation Conference: Making Fair Lending a Reality in the New Millenium. June 30.
6.
BunceHarold L., and ScheesseleRandall M.1996. ?The GSEs Funding of Affordable Loans.?Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Housing Finance Working Paper No. HF-001.
7.
CannerGlenn B., and PassmoreWayne. 1995. “Credit Risk and the Provision of Mortgages to Lower income and Minority Homebuyers.”Federal Reserve Bulletin, 81 (November): 989–1016.
8.
CannerGlenn B., PassmoreWayne, and SuretteBrian J.1996. “Distribution of Credit Risk among Providers of Mortgages to Lower income and Minority Homebuyers.”Federal Reserve Bulletin, 82(December): 1077–1102.
9.
Fair, Issac and Company. 1997. Credit Bureau Scores Questions and Answers. Mimeo.
10.
MaeFannie. 2000a. Remarks Prepared for Delivery by Franklin Raines, Chairman and CEO of Fannie Mae to the National Community Reinvestment Coalition.Washington, D.C. March 20.
11.
MaeFannie. 2000b. Remarks Prepared for Delivery by Franklin Raines, Chairman and CEO of Fannie Mae to the National Association of Homebuilders. Dallas, Texas. January 15. <http://www.fanniemae.com>
12.
MaeFannie. 1999. Trillion Dollar Commitment: 1999 Annual Report. Report.
13.
MaeFannie. 1998. What are Credit Scoring and Automated Underwriting!Washington, D.C: Report.
14.
MaeFannie. 1997. One Trillion Dollar Commitment: 1996 Report.Washington, D.C.
15.
MaeFannie. 1995. Showing America a New Way Home: 1994 Report.Washington, D.C.
16.
FesbachDan, and SchwinnPat. 1999. “Tactical Approaches to Credit Scores.”Mortgage Banking. February.
17.
FFIEC. 1997. Community Reinvestment Act Examination Procedures for Large Retail Institutions. Mimeo.
18.
MacFreddie. 1998. We Open Doors for America?s Families: Annual Housing Activities Report.McLean, VA.: Freddie Mac.
19.
MacFreddie, 1996. Automated Underwriting: Making Mortgage Lending Simpler and Fairer for America's Families.McLean, VA: Freddie Mac. Report.
20.
GalsterGeorge. 1996. “Future Directions in Mortgage Discrimination, Research and Enforcement.” Pp. 679–716. In GoeringJohn, and WienkRon, eds. Mortgage Lending, Racial Discrimination, and Federal Policy.Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
21.
General Accounting Office. 1996. Housing Enterprises: Potential Impacts of Severing Government Sponsorship. Report.
22.
MaeGinnie. 1999. Annual Report. Report.
23.
GoldbergDebbie. 1999. “Building on a Shaky Foundation.”NeighborWorks Journal, 17 <http://www.nw.org>
24.
LeaMichael. 1996. “Innovation and the Cost of Mortgage Credit.”Housing Policy Debate7: 147–174.
25.
LeaMichael, and CalhounCharles. 1998. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Purpose, Function and Performance: Past, Present and Future. Report Prepared for the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. Report.
26.
LindJohn E.1996. Community Reinvestment and Equal Credit Opportunity Performance of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from the 1994 HMDA Data.San Francisco: Caniccor. Report.
27.
ListokinDavid, and WylyElvin. 1999. Successful Mortgage Lending Strategies for the Underserved.U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. Report.
28.
HeatherMacDonald. 1995. “Secondary Mortgage Markets and Federal Housing Policy.”Journal of Urban Affairs17: 53–79.
29.
MahoneyPeter, and ZornPeter. 1996. “The Promise of Automated Underwriting: Providing a Simpler, Fairer, and More Inclusive Mortgage Lending System.”1996 Mortgage Market Trends.
30.
ManchesterPaul B.1998. ?Characteristics of Mortgages Purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: 1996–97 Update.?Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Housing Finance Working Paper No. HF-006.
31.
ManchesterPaul B., NealSue George, and BunceHarold L.1998. “Characteristics of Mortgages Purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, 1993–1995.”Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Housing Finance Working Paper No. HF-003.
32.
Mortgage Technology.1997. April/May.
33.
Office of Federal Housing Enterprises Oversight. 1999Report to Congress. Report.
34.
PachuraStanley. 1996. “Up and Running: How Three Lenders on the Front Lines of the Automated Underwriting Revolution Are Reducing Costs, Adding Customers, Energizing Loan Processors, and Getting a Competitive Advantage on the 21st Century.”Mortgage Banking:23–29. May.
35.
QuerciaRoberto. 1999. “Assessing The Performance of 16 Affordable Loans: Implications for Research and Policy.”Journal of Planning Literature
36.
SimmonsPatrick, ed. 1997. Housing Statistics of the United States.Lanham, MD.: Bernan Press.
37.
The Market Pulse.1997. Fall.
38.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2000. Distribution of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Purchases. Mimeo.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1999b. The Daily Focus for Friday, October 29, 1999: Homeownership Rate Hits record High of 67 Percent: More than 70 Million Families Own Homes, <http://www.hud.gov>
41.
Van OrderRobert. 1996. “Discrimination and the Secondary Mortgage Market.” Pp. 335–363 in GoeringJohn, and WienkRon (eds.) Mortgage Lending, Racial Discrimination, and Federal Policy.Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
42.
WilliamsRichard. 1999. The Effects of GSEs, CRA, and Institutional Characteristics on Home Mortgage Lending to Underserved Markets.U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. Report.