Validity of the Patient Specific Functional Scale in Patients following Upper Extremity Nerve Injury

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated the validity of the Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in patients with upper extremity nerve injury.

Methods

Following Research Ethics Boards (REB) approval, we included English-speaking adults, with greater than 6 months after an upper extremity nerve injury. Patient reported questionnaires included: PSFS, 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), McGill Pain Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Pain Disability Index (PDI). Statistical analyses evaluated the relationships among the outcome measures and the independent variables (age, gender, nerve injured, time since injury, work status, worker's compensation/litigation). Linear regression was used to evaluate the variables that predicted the PSFS.

Results

There were 157 patients (53 women, 104 men); median time since injury of 14 months. The mean ± SD scores were: PSFS 3.1 ± 2.3, DASH 44 ± 22, PCS 16 ± 15, pain intensity 4.2 ± 3.0, pain rating index 13 ± 11, PDI 28.3 ± 17.6 and SF-36 component scores physical (41.8 ± 8.7) mental (45.9 ± 12.6). There were moderate correlations between the PSFS and the DASH, and the SF-36 physical role domain. The PSFS was significantly lower in brachial plexus injuries. The final model explained 20.7 % of the variance and independent variables were DASH, nerve injured and age. Conclusion This study provides evidence of construct validity of the PSFS for patients with upper extremity nerve injury. The PSFS is a valid method to assess functional limitations identified by the individual and can be completed in a shorter period of time than the DASH.

Keywords

Validity Nerve injury Upper extremity Self-report function Outcome

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed-Labib

Golan

Jacques

. Functional outcome of brachial plexus reconstruction after trauma. Neurosurgery. 2007;61 (5):1016–23.

Beaton

Katz

Fossel

Wright

Tarasuk

Bombardier

. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14(2):128–46.

Brazier

Harper

Jones

O'Cathain

Thomas

Usherwood

. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305(6846):160–4.

Chatman

Hyams

Neel

Binkley

Stratford

Schomberg

. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1997;77:820–9.

Chibnall

Tait

. The Pain Disability Index: factor structure and normative data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(10):1082–6.

Chibnall

Tait

. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in African American and Caucasian workers' compensation claimants with low back injuries. Pain. 2005;113(3):369–75.

Cleland

Fritz

Whitman

Palmer

. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and Patient Specific Functional Scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2006;31(5):598–602.

Garratt

Ruta

Abdalla

Buckingham

Russell

. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ. 1993;306(6890):1440–4.

Gracely

Geisser

Giesecke

Grant

MAB

Petzke

Williams

. Pain catastrophizing and neural responses to pain among persons with fibromyalgia. Brain. 2004;127(4):835–43.

10.

Gross

Mattie

Asante

. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validity in workers' compensation claimants. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(7):1294–9.

11.

Gummesson

Atroshi

Ekdahl

. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:11–6.

12.

Hefford

Abbot

Arnold

Baxter

. The patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:56–65.

13.

Hudak

Amadio

Bombardier

. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602–8.

14.

Hunsaker

Cioffi

Amadio

Caughlin

. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84-A:208–15.

15.

Jenkinson

Wright

Coulter

. Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample. Qual Life Res. 1994;3(1):7–12.

16.

McHorney

Raczek

. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31(3):247–63.

17.

McMillan

Binhammer

. Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery. Hand. 2009;4(3):311–8.

18.

Melzack

. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1(3):277–99.

19.

Melzack

. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30(2):191–7.

20.

Norman

Streiner

. Biostatistics: The bare essentials. 2nd ed. Hamilton, B.C.: Decker Inc.; 2000.

21.

Novak

Anastakis

Beaton

Katz

. Patient reported outcome following peripheral nerve injury. J Hand Surg. 2009;34A(2):281–7.

22.

Novak

Anastakis

Beaton

Mackinnon

Katz

. Biomedical and psychosocial factors associated with disability after peripheral nerve injury. J Bone Joint Surg. 2011;93A(10):929–36.

23.

Osman

Barrios

Gituerrez

Kopper

Merrifield

Grittmann

. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: further psychometric evaluation with adult samples. J Behav Med. 2000;23(4):351–65.

24.

Osman

Barrios

Kopper

Hauptmann

Jones

O'Neill

. Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Behav Med. 1997;20(6):589–605.

25.

Pengel

LHM

Refshauge

Maher

. Responsiveness for pain, disability and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2004;29(8):879–83.

26.

Pietrobon

Coeytaux

Carey

Richardson

DeVellis

. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction. Spine. 2002;27(5):515–22.

27.

Pollard

. Preliminary validity study of the Pain Disability Index. Percept Mot Skills. 1984;59(3):974.

28.

Rosengren

Brodin

. Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Patient Specific Functional Scale in patients with treated surgically for carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Ther. 2012;26(1):53–61.

29.

Stratford

Gill

Westaway

Binkley

. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47(4):258–62.

30.

Sullivan

MJL

Bishop

Pivik

. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7 (4):524–32.

31.

Tait

Chibnall

. Factor structure of the Pain Disability Index in Workers' Compensation claimants with low back injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(6):1141–6.

32.

Tait

Chibnall

Krause

. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties. Pain. 1990;40(2):171–82.

33.

Tait

Pollard

Margolis

Duckro

Krause

. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68(7):438–41.

34.

VanDamme

Crombez

Bijttebier

Goubert

Van Houdenhove

. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: invariant factor structure across clinical and non-clinical populations. Pain. 2002;96(3):319–24.

35.

Ware

Sherbourne

. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.

36.

Westaway

Stratford

Binkley

. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(5):331–8.