The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of outcomes of fingertip revision amputation for fingertip amputation injuries in the English-language literature to provide best evidence of functional outcomes.
Method
A MEDLINE literature search was performed to identify studies that met the following criteria: (1) reported primary data; (2) included at least five cases of primary revision amputation treatment following digit amputation injury; (3) reported finger or thumb amputation at or distal to the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint or interphalangeal (IP) joint, respectively; (4) presented at least one of the following outcomes: static two-point discrimination (2PD), cold intolerance, arc of motion (AOM) of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, proximal interphalangeal joints (PIP), DIP joints, or return-to-work time.
Results
Thirty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven studies reported 2PD, 20 studies reported cold intolerance, eight studies reported AOM, and 18 studies reported return-to-work time after revision amputation of fingertip injuries. The mean 2PD was 5.6 mm. On average, 24 % of patients experienced cold intolerance. AOM at the PIP joint was reported in four studies and averaged 94°. DIP joint AOM was presented in four studies and averaged 66°. Thumb MCP and IP joint AOM was presented in three and four studies, respectively. Mean thumb MCP joint AOM was 54° and that of the IP joint was 71°. The mean return-to-work time was 47 days.
Conclusions
On average, fingertip revision amputation can achieve almost normal sensibility and satisfactory motion and patients can expect to return to work on average approximately 7 weeks after surgery.
AdaniRBusaRCastagnettiCBathiaACaroliA. Homodigital neurovascular island flaps with “direct flow” vascularization. Annals of Plastic Surgery.1997;38:36–40.
2.
AdaniRBusaRPancaldiGCaroliA. Reverse neurovascular homodigital island flap. Annals of Plastic Surgery.1995;35:77–82.
3.
AdaniRMarcoccioITaralloLFregniU. The reverse heterodigital neurovascular island flap for digital pulp reconstruction. Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery.2005;9:91–5.
4.
BakhachJGuimberteauJCPanconiB. The Gigogne flap: an original technique for an optimal pulp reconstruction. Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume.2009;34:227–34.
5.
BaumeisterSMenkeHWittemannMGermannG. Functional outcome after the Moberg advancement flap in the thumb. Journal of Hand Surgery—American Volume.2002;27:105–14.
6.
BormanHMaralTTancerM. Fingertip reconstruction using two variations of direct-flow homodigital neurovascular island flaps. Annals of Plastic Surgery.2000;45:24–30.
7.
BuckleySCScottSDasK. Late review of the use of silver sulphadiazine dressings for the treatment of fingertip injuries. Injury.2000;31:301–4.
8.
CaoXCaiJ. Double mini-flaps from fingers for reconstruction of distal portion of thumb. Hand Surgery.2002;7:15–9.
9.
ChenCZhangXShaoXGaoSWangBLiuD. Treatment of thumb tip degloving injury using the modified first dorsal metacarpal artery flap. The Journal of Hand Surgery.2010;35:1663–70.
10.
ChungKC. JHS guidelines on systematic review and meta-analysis submissions. The Journal of Hand Surgery.2012;37:1121–4.
11.
ChungKCKowalskiCPWaltersMR. Finger replantation in the United States: rates and resource use from the 1996 Healthcare Cost and Utilization project. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2000;25:1038–42.
12.
De SmetLKinnenLMoermansJPCeuterickPVan WetterP. Fingertip amputations: distal or advancement flaps. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica.1989;55:177–82.
13.
FarrellRGDisherWANeslandRSPalmatierTHTruhlerTD. Conservative management of fingertip amputations. JACEP.1977;6:243–6.
14.
FoucherGDallaserraMTilquinBLenobleESammutD. The Hueston flap in reconstruction of fingertip skin loss: results in a series of 41 patients. Journal of Hand Surgery—American Volume.1994;19:508–15.
15.
FoucherGSmithDPempinelloCBraunFMCitronN. Homodigital neurovascular island flaps for digital pulp loss. Journal of Hand Surgery—British Volume.1989;14:204–8.
16.
FoxJWGoldenGTRodeheaverGEdgertonMTEdlichRF. Nonoperative management of fingertip pulp amputation by occlusive dressings. American Journal of Surgery.1977;133:255–6.
17.
FrandsenPA. V-Y plasty as treatment of finger tip amputations. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica.1978;49:255–9.
18.
FreibergAManktelowR. The Kutler repair for fingertip amputations. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.1972;50:371–5.
19.
GelbermanRHUrbaniakJRBrightDSLevinLS. Digital sensibility following replantation. The Journal of Hand Surgery.1978;3:313–9.
20.
GrahamBSchofieldM. Self-reported symptoms of cold intolerance in workers with injuries of the hand. Hand (N Y).2008;3:203–9.
21.
HammoudaAAEl-KhatibHAAl-HetmiT. Extended step-advancement flap for avulsed amputated fingertip—a new technique to preserve finger length: case series. Journal of Hand Surgery—American Volume.2011;36:129–34.
22.
HattoriYDoiKIkedaKEstrellaEP. A retrospective study of functional outcomes after successful replantation versus amputation closure for single fingertip amputations. Journal of Hand Surgery—American Volume.2006;31:811–8.
23.
HeisteinJBCookPA. Factors affecting composite graft survival in digital tip amputations. Ann Plast Surg.2003;50:299–303.
24.
IrwinMSGilbertSETerenghiGSmithRWGreenCJ. Cold intolerance following peripheral nerve injury. Natural history and factors predicting severity of symptoms. J Hand Surg Br.1997;22:308–16.
25.
KappelDABurechJG. The cross-finger flap. An established reconstructive procedure. Hand Clinics.1985;1:677–83.
KimKSYooSIKimDYLeeSYChoBH. Fingertip reconstruction using a volar flap based on the transverse palmar branch of the digital artery. Annals of Plastic Surgery.2001;47:263–8.
28.
LanzettaMMastropasquaBCholletABriseboisN. Versatility of the homodigital triangular neurovascular island flap in fingertip reconstruction. Journal of Hand Surgery—British Volume.1995;20:824–9.
29.
LaoulakosDHTsetsonisCHMichailAAKaxiraOSPapatheodorakisPH. The dorsal reverse adipofascial flap for fingertip reconstruction. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.2003;112:121–5. discussion 6–8.
30.
LouisDSPalmerAKBurneyRE. Open treatment of digital tip injuries. JAMA.1980;244:697–8.
31.
LundborgGRosenB. The two-point discrimination test—time for a re-appraisal?J Hand Surg Br.2004;29:418–22.
32.
MaGFChengJCChanKTChanKMLeungPC. Finger tip injuries—a prospective study on seven methods of treatment on 200 cases. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.1982;11:207–13.
33.
MallonWJBrownHRNunleyJA. Digital ranges of motion: normal values in young adults. The Journal of hand surgery.1991;16:882–7.
34.
NystromABackmanCBackmanCBertheimUKarlssonLCarlssonA. Digital amputation, replantation, and cold intolerance. J Reconstr Microsurg.1991;7:175–8.
35.
OmokawaSFujitaniRDohiYTanakaYYajimaH. Reverse midpalmar island flap transfer for fingertip reconstruction. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.2009;25:171–9.
36.
OzcelikIBPurisaHMersaBSezerIErturerEErgunO. Late results of replantations in tip amputations of the thumb. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc.2008;42:252–7.
37.
OzdemirRKilincHSensozOUnluREBaranCN. Innervated dorsal adipofascial turnover flap for fingertip amputations. Annals of Plastic Surgery.2001;46:9–14.
38.
OzerKKramerWGillaniSWilliamsASmithW. Replantation versus revision of amputated fingers in patients air-transported to a level 1 trauma center. The Journal of hand surgery.2010;35:936–40.
39.
OzyigitMTTurkaslanTOzsoyZ. Dorsal V-Y advancement flap for amputations of the fingertips. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery & Hand Surgery.2007;41:315–9.
40.
PelissierPGenin-EtcheberryTCasoliVPistreVMartinDBaudetJ. Limits and indications of the dorsal transposition flap: critical evaluation of 15 cases. The Journal of Hand Surgery.2001;26:277–82.
41.
SanoKOzekiSKimuraKHyakusokuH. Relationship between sensory recovery and advancement distance of oblique triangular flap for fingertip reconstruction. Journal of Hand Surgery—American Volume.2008;33:1088–92.
42.
SebastinSJChungKC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.2011;128:723–37.
43.
ShaoXChenCZhangXYuYRenDLuL. Coverage of fingertip defect using a dorsal island pedicle flap including both dorsal digital nerves. Journal of Hand Surgery—American Volume.2009;34:1474–81.
44.
TsaiTMYuenJC. A neurovascular island flap for volar-oblique fingertip amputations. Analysis of long-term results. Journal of Hand Surgery—British Volume.1996;21:94–8.
45.
TuncaliDBarutcuAYGokremSTerziogluAAslanG. The hatchet flap for reconstruction of fingertip amputations. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.2006;117:1933–9.
46.
TupperJMillerG. Sensitivity following volar V-Y plasty for fingertip amputations. Journal of Hand Surgery—British Volume.1985;10:183–4.
47.
VaritimidisSEDailianaZHZibisAHHantesMBargiotasKMalizosKN. Restoration of function and sensitivity utilizing a homodigital neurovascular island flap after amputation injuries of the fingertip. Journal of Hand Surgery—British Volume.2005;30:338–42.
48.
VenkatramaniHSabapathySR. Fingertip replantation: technical considerations and outcome analysis of 24 consecutive fingertip replantations. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery: Official Publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India.2011;44:237–45.
49.
WangBChenLLuLLiuZZhangZSongL. The homodigital neurovascular antegrade island flap for fingertip reconstruction in children. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica.2011;77:598–602.
50.
WoonCY-LLeeJY-LTeohL-C. Resurfacing hemipulp losses of the thumb: the cross finger flap revisited: indications, technical refinements, outcomes, and long-term neurosensory recovery. Annals of Plastic Surgery.2008;61:385–91.
51.
YazarMAydinAKurt YazarSBasaranKGuvenE. Sensory recovery of the reverse homodigital island flap in fingertip reconstruction: a review of 66 cases. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc.2010;44:345–51.
52.
YazarMAydinAKurt YazarSBasaranKGuvenE. Sensory recovery of the reverse homodigital island flap in fingertip reconstruction: a review of 66 cases. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica.2010;44:345–51.
