AllouchHBehnke-MurschJ. Retrieval of foreign bodies adjacent to the nervous system: aspects of intra-operative use of ultrasound. Acta Neurochir (Wien).2008;150(1):63–5.
2.
BergWAHamperUM. Norplant implants: sonographic identification and localization for removal. Am J Roentgenol.1995;164:419–20.
3.
BlanchardPAKellermanRD. Alternative procedure for removal of Norplant (letter). Am Fam Physician.1994;49:1733.
4.
BlumenthalPDGaffikinLAffandiB. Training for Norplant implant removal: assessment of learning curves and competency. Obstet Gynecol.1997;89:174–8.
5.
CecilHReedDHoltzJ. Norplant removal facilitated by use of ultrasound for localization. J Fam Pract.1995;40:182–3.
6.
CoukellAJBalfourJA. Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability. Drugs.1998;55(6):861–87.
7.
CoutinhoEDa SilvaARMattosCER. Contraception with long acting subdermal implants: I. An effective and acceptable modality in international clinical trials. Contraception.1978;18(4):315–33.
8.
CozensN.J.A. Contraceptive implants: high resolution ultrasonography facilitates removal. BMJ.1996;313:880.
9.
DarneyPPatelARosenKShapiroLSKaunitzAM. Safety and efficacy of a single-rod etonogestrel implant (Implanon): results from 11 international clinical trials. Fertil Steril.2009;91:1646–53.
10.
DunsonTRAmatyaRNKruegerSL. Complications and risk factors associated with the removal of Norplant implants. Obstet Gynecol.1995;85:543–8.
11.
EspeyEOgburnT. Long-acting reversible contraceptives: intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant. Obstet Gynecol.2011;117(3):705–19.
12.
FrankMLDitmoreRIlegboduAE. Characteristics and experiences of American women electing for early removal of contraceptive implants. Contraception.1995;52:159–65.
13.
GilliesRScougallPNicklinS. Etonogestrel implants—case studies of median nerve injury following removal. Aust Fam Physician.2011;40(10):799–800.
14.
KirkEPFieldCS. Difficult Norplant removal facilitated by fluoroscopy [letter]. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1993;169:748.
15.
KlavonSLGrubbGS. Insertion site complications during the first year of Norplant® use. Contraception.1990;41(1):27–37.
16.
LangJFHeineMWPurdonTF. Use of needle localization for difficult Norplant removal (letter; comment). Am J Obstet Gynecol.1994;171:1161–2.
17.
LeJTsourounisC. Implanon: a critical review. Ann Pharmacother.2001;35(3):329–36.
18.
LetterieGSGarnaasM. Localization of “lost” Norplant capsules using compression film screen mammography. Obstet Gynecol.1995;85(5 II Suppl):886–7.
19.
LevineJPSinofskyFEChristMF. Assessment of Implanon insertion and removal. Am J Obstet Gynecol.2006;195(1):323–6.
20.
MarinRMcMillianD. Ulnar neuropathy associated with subdermal contraceptive implant. South Med J.1998;91(9):875–8.
21.
MascarenhasL. Insertion and removal of Implanon: practical considerations. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care.2000;5Suppl 2:29–34.
22.
MascarenhasL. Insertion and removal of Implanon. Contraception.2008;78(5):409–17.
23.
Merki-FeldGSBrekenfeldCMiggeB. Nonpalpable ultrasonographically not detectable Implanon rods can be localized by magnetic resonance imaging. Contraception.2001;63(6):325–8.
24.
MillerLGriceJ. Intradermal proximal field block: an innovative anesthetic technique for levonorgestrel implant removal. Obstet Gynecol.1998;91:294–7.
25.
OsmanNDinhADubertT. A new cause for iatrogenic lesion of the ulnar nerve at the arm: contraceptive hormonal implant. Report of two cases. Chir Main.2005;24(3–4):181–3.
26.
PowerJFrenchRCowanF. Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods of preventing pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2007;18(3):CD001326.
27.
PraptohardjoUWibowoS. The “U” technique: anew method for Norplant implants removal. Contraception.1993;48:526–36.
28.
RekersHAffandiB. Implanon studies conducted in Indonesia. Contraception.2004;70(5):433.
29.
RosenbergMJAlvarezFBaroneMA. A comparison of “U” and standard techniques for Norplant removal. Obstet Gynecol.1997;89:168–73.
30.
Roussel Laboratories Limited: Norplant.ABPI Compendium of Data Sheets and Summaries of Product Characteristics 1996–97. London: Datapharm Publications Limited; 938.
31.
SarmaSPHatcherR. The Emory method: a modified approach to Norplant implants removal. Contraception.1994;49:551–6.
32.
SarmaSPHatcherRP. Neurovascular injury during removal of levonorgestrel implants. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1995;172(1 Pt 1):120–1.
33.
SarmaSPSilversteinMLewisC. Removal of a Norplant implant located near a major nerve using interventional radiology-digital subtraction fluoroscopy. Contraception.1998;58(6):387–9.
34.
SarmaSPWamsherJGWhitlockSW. Removal of deeply inserted, nonpalpable levonorgestrel (Norplant®) implants. Contraception.1996;53:159–61.
35.
ShihataAASalzettiRGSchnepperFW. Innovative technique for Norplant implants removal. Contraception.1995;51:83–5.
36.
SivinILähteenmäkiPMishellDR. First week drug concentrations in women with levonorgestrel rod or Norplant® capsule implants ((registered trademark)). Contraception.1997;56:317–21.
37.
SmithJMConwitRABlumenthalPD. Ulnar nerve injury associated with removal of Norplant implants. Contraception.1998;57(2):99–101.
ThomsenRJPasqualeSNosherJ. Ultrasonic visualization of Norplant® subdermal contraceptive devices. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.1985;23(3):223–7.
40.
ThurmondASWeinsteinASJonesMK. Localization of contraceptive implant capsules for removal. Radiology.1994;193:580–1.
41.
TwicklerDMSchwarzBE. Imaging of the levonorgestrel implantable contraceptive device [letter]. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1992;167:572–3.
42.
VidinEGarbinORodriguezB. Removal of etonogestrel contraceptive implants in the operating theater: report on 28 cases. Contraception.2007;76(1):35–9.
43.
WechselbergerGWolframDPülzlP. Nerve injury caused by removal of an implantable hormonal contraceptive. Am J Obstet Gynecol.2006;195(1):323–6.
44.
WehrleKE. The Norplant system: easy to insert, easy to remove. Nurse Pract.1994;19(4):47–54.
45.
WeinerHMDiMarcangeloMTHeimJA. Use of computed tompography guidance and mammographic hook wires to remove displaced, embedded contraceptive rods. J Am Osteopath Assoc.1996;96:422–3.