Orthopaedic surgeons are often asked to evaluate X-rays of patients admitted to the Accident and Emergency Department with the suspicion of a wrist fracture or, in the case of an evident fracture, to decide the correct treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a correct interpretation of the images of injured wrists on the screen of a last generation mobile phone, in order to evaluate if the specialist could make the right diagnosis and choose the correct treatment.
Methods
Five orthopaedic and one hand surgeons have evaluate the X-rays of 67 patients who sustained an injury to their wrist. In the case of fracture, they were asked to classify it according to the AO and Mayo classification systems. The evaluation of the images was accomplished through the PACS and using a mobile phone, at a different time. In order to check the inter- and intra-observer reliability, the same pattern was followed after a few months.
Results
The mobile phone showed basically the same agreement between the observers highlighting the worsening of the inter- and intra-observer reliability with the increment of the variables considered by a classification system.
Conclusions
The present paper confirms that a last generation mobile phone can already be used in the clinical practise of orthopaedic surgeons on call who could use it as a useful device in remote or poorly served areas for a rapid and economic consultation
Level of Evidence
The level of evidence of this case is economic and decision analysis, level 2
AbboudJABozentkaDJBeredjiklianPK. Telemedicine consultation for patients with upper extremity disorders is reliable. Clin Orthop Relat Res.2005;435:250–7.
2.
AndersenDJBlairWFSteyersCMJrAdamsBEl-KhouriGYBrandserE. Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. J Hand Surg.1996;21-A(4):574–82.
3.
ArchboldHAGuhaARShyamsundarSMcBrideSJCharlwoodPWrayR. The use of multi-media messaging in the referral of musculoskeletal limb injuries to a tertiary trauma unit using: a 1-month evaluation. Injury.2005;36(4):560–6.
4.
BaruffaldiFGualdriniGToniA. Comparison of asynchronous and realtime teleconsulting for orthopaedic second opinion. J Telemed Telecare.2002;8:297–301.
5.
BashshurR. (1980) Technology serves the people: The story of a cooperative telemedicine project by NASA, the Indian Health Service and the Papago people. Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
6.
BashshurRLArmstrongPAYoussefZI. Telemedicine: exploration in the use of telecommunications in health care. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas; 1975.
7.
BashshurRLovettJ. Assessment of telemedicine: results of the initial experience. Aviat Space Environ Med.1977;48 (1):65–70.
8.
BownsIRCollinsKWaltersSJMcDonaghAJ. Telemedicine in dermatology: a randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess.2006;10(43):1–39. iii–iv, ix–xi.
9.
ChandhanayingyongCTangtrakulwanichBKiriratnikomT. Teleconsultation for emergency orthopaedic patients using the multimedia messaging service via mobile phones. J Telemed Telecare.2007;13(4):193–6.
10.
CohenJ. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas.1960;20(1):37–46.
11.
ColeJRMemphisTNBindra RandipREvanoffBAGilulaLAYamaguchiK. Radiographic evaluation of osseous displacement following intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: reliability of plain radiography versus computed tomography. The J Hand Surg.1997;22(5):792–800.
12.
CooneyWP. Fractures of the distal radius: a modern treatment based classification. Orthop Clin N Am.1993;24:211–6.
13.
FleissJL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull.1971;76(5):378–82.
14.
FleissJLCohenJ. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas.1973;33:613–9.
15.
FlinkkilaTNikkola-SittoAKaarelaOPaakkoERaatikainenT. Poor interobserver reliability of AO classification of fractures of the distal radius. Additional computed tomography is of minor value. J Bone Joint Surg (Br).1998;4:670–2.
16.
FooteDR. Satellite communication for rural health care in Alaska. J Commun.1977;27(4):173–82.
17.
HartvigsenGJohansenMAHasvoldPBellikaJGArsandEArildE. Challenges in telemedicine and eHealth: lessons learned from 20 years with telemedicine in Tromsø. Stud Health Technol Inf.2007;129(Pt 1):82–6.
18.
HoffmannTRussellT. Pre-admission orthopaedic occupational therapy home visits conducted using the Internet. J Telemed Telecare.2008;14(2):83–7.
19.
HsiehCHJengSFChenCYYinJWYangJCTsaiHH. Teleconsultation with the mobile camera–phone in remote evaluation of replantation potential. J Trauma.2005;58(6):1208–12.
20.
HsiehCHTsaiHHYinJWChenCYYangJCJengSF. Teleconsultation with the mobile camera–phone in digital soft-tissue injury: a feasibility study. Plast Reconstr Surg.2004;114 (7):1776–82.
21.
JinWJJiangLSShenLLuHCuiYMZhouQ. The interobserver reliability of the Cooney classification of distal radius fractures between experienced orthopaedic surgeons. J Hand Surg.2007;32E(5):509–11.
22.
KatzHPKaltsounisDHalloranLMondorM. Patient safety and telephone medicine: some lessons from closed claim case review. J Gen Intern Med.2008;23(5):517–22.
23.
KimDKYooSKKimSH. Instant wireless transmission of radiological images using a personal digital assistant phone for emergency teleconsultation. J Telemed Telecare.2005;11 Suppl 2: S58–61.
24.
KrederHJHanelDPMcKeeMJupiterJMcGillivaryGSwiontkowskiMF. Consistency of AO fracture classification for the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg [Br].1996;78-B:726–31.
25.
LabirisGPapadopoulisGLentarisGKafentzisMDrakakisA. Internet based counseling to remote orthopedic patients. Acta Orthop Scand.2004;75:366–7.
26.
LamTKPreketesAGatesR. Mobile phone photo messaging assisted communication in the assessment of hand trauma. ANZ J Surg.2004;74:598–602.
27.
LandisJRKochGG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics.1977;33:159–74.
28.
MannTColvenR. A picture is worth more than a thousand words: enhancement of a pre-exam telephone consultation in dermatology with digital images. Acad Med.2002;77(7):742–3.
29.
Mendes de Oliveira FilhoODias BelangeroWMendes TelesJB. Fraturas do radio distal: avaliacao das classificacoes. Rev Assoc Med Bras.2004;50(1):55–61.
30.
MoumoulidisIManiNPatelHLeongP. A novel use of photo messaging in the assessment of nasal fractures. J Telemed Telecare.2007;13(8):387–90.
31.
MullerMENazarianSKochP. Classification AO des Factures. Paris: Springer; 1987.
32.
MurphyRLBirdKT. Telediagnosis: a new community health resource: observations on the feasibility of telediagnosis based on 1000 patient transcactions. Am J Public Health.1974;64(2):113–9.
33.
NaqviSGAReynoldsTKitsisC. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility for distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg.2009;00-E(4):1–3.
34.
NgWHWangENgI. Multimedia Messaging Service tele-radiology in the provision of emergency neurosurgery services. Surg Neurol.2007;67(4):338–41.
35.
OskamJKingmaJKlasenHJ. Interrater reliability for the basic categories of the AO/ASIF'S system as a frame of reference for classifying distal radial fractures. Percept Motor Skills.2001;92:589–94.
36.
PloegmakersJJWMaderKPennigDVerheyenCCPM. Four distal radial fracture classification systems tested amongst a large panel of Dutch trauma surgeons. Injury.2007;38:1268–72.
37.
RaikinSMBleyLALebRB. Emerging technology: remote analysis of traumatic musculoskeletal radiographs transmitted by electronic mail. J Orthop Trauma.1999;13(7):516–9.
38.
RicciWMBorrelliJ. Teleradiology in orthopaedic surgery: impact on clinical decision making for acute fracture management. J Orthop Trauma.2002;16(1):1–6.
39.
TangtrakulwanichBKwunpirojWChongsuvivatwongVGeaterAFKiatsirirojN. Teleconsultation with digital camera images is useful for fracture care. Clin Orthop Relat Res.2006;449:308–12.
40.
TsaiHHPongYPLiangCCLinPYHsiehCH. Teleconsultation by using the mobile camera phone for remote management of the extremity wound: a pilot study. Ann Plast Surg.2004;53(6):584–7.
41.
VladzymyrskyyAV. Our experience with telemedicine in traumatology and orthopedics. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg.2004;10 (3):189–91.
42.
VuolioSWinbladIOhinmaaAHaukipuroK. Videoconferencing for orthopaedic outpatient. One year follow-up. J Telemed Telecare.2003;9:8–11.
43.
YamadaMWataraiHAndouTSakalN. Emergency image transfer system through a mobile telephone in Japan: technical note. Neurosurgery.2003;52:986–90.
