The reconstruction of the continuity of flexor tendons disruptions in zone II still remains one of the most challenging problems in hand surgery. The ideal repair has to provide sufficient strength and the possibility of early mobilization in the attempt to obtain a functional range of motion. One of the methods which appears to respond to these requests is the pull-out technique described by Brunelli, which moves the tension from the level of the tendon disruption to the finger pulp over the tendon insertion.
Methods
After using this method, but by doing some modifications of the original technique, our aim was to conduct a retrospective study looking at gap formation, suture strength, rupture rate, efficiency of the two-strand suture repair and of the early active mobilization against resistance in obtaining a good range of flexion rate. We reviewed a series of 71 flexor digitorum profundus disruptions in zone II, in 58 patients admitted in our service between 2000 and 2008, and treated with this method.
Results
We achieved a complete range of flexion in 41 fingers (57.7%) and a flexion deficit of 5-10° in eight fingers (11.3%) and of 10-20° in 22 fingers (31%). We had no ruptures, major strength deficit, or bowstringing.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates that, by moving the tension from the level of disruption to the finger pulp, the rehabilitation program can begin very early post surgery. We had 0% ruptures.
AngelesJGHemingerHMassDP. Comparative biomechanical performances 4-strand core suture repairs for zone II flexor tendon lacerations. J Hand Surg.2002;27A:508–17.
2.
BainbridgeLCRobertsonCGilliesDElliotD. A comparison of post-operative mobilization of flexor tendon repairs with “passive flexion-active extension” and “controlled active motion” technique. J Hand Surg.1994;19B:517–21.
3.
BaktirATurkCYKabakSSahinVKardasY. Flexor tendon repair in zone 2, followed by early active mobilization. J Hand Surg.1996;21B:624–8.
4.
BrunelliGMoniniL. Technique personnelle de suture des tendons flechisseurs des doigts avec mobilization immediate. Ann Chir Main.1982;1:92–6.
5.
BrunelliGMoniniL. Technique personnelle de suture des tendons flechisseurs des doigts avec mobilization immediate. Ann Chir Main.1992;11:67–8.
6.
CaoYTangJB. Biomechanical evaluation of a four-strand modification of the Tang method of tendon repair. J Hand Surg.2005;30B:374–8.
7.
ChowJAThomesLJDovelleSMilnorWHSeyferAESmithAC. A combined regimen of controlled motion following flexor-tendon repair in “no man's land”. Plast Reconstr Surg.1987;79:447–55.
8.
CoatsRWIIEchevarria-OreJMassDP. Acute flexor tendon repairs in zone II. Hand Clinics.2005;21:173–9.
9.
CullenKWTolhurstPLangeDPageRE. Flexor tendon repair in zone 2 followed by controlled active mobilization. J Hand Surg.1989;14B:392–5.
10.
DowdMBFigusAHarrisSBSouthgateCMFosterAJElliotD. The results of immediate re-repair of zone 1 and 2 primary flexor tendon repairs which rupture. J Hand Surg.2006;31B:507–13.
11.
ElliotDMoiemenNSFlemmingAFSHarrisSBFosterAJ. The rupture rate of acute flexor tendon repairs mobilized by the controlled active motion regimen. J Hand Surg.1994;19B:607–12.
12.
GaultDT. A review of repaired flexor tendons. J Hand Surg.1987;12:321–5.
13.
GillRSLimBHShatfordRA. A comparative analysis of the six-strand double-loop flexor tendon repair and three other techniques: a human cadaveric study. J Hand Surg.1999;24A:1315–22.
14.
GreenwaldDPHongHZMayJW. Mechanical analysis of tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg.1994;19A:641–7.
15.
HarrisSBHarrisDFosterAJElliotD. The aetiology of acute rupture of flexor tendon repairs in zones 1 and 2 of the fingers during early mobilization. J Hand Surg.1999;24B:275–80.
16.
HelmRH. The management of flexor tendon injuries in zone II. Current Orthop.2002;16:434–41.
17.
HillCRiazMMozzamA. A regional audit of hand and wrist injuries. A study of 4873 injuries. J Hand Surg.1998;23B:196–200.
18.
KangRHWagesDJMayJW. The Massachusetts General Hospital flexor tenorrhaphy. Op Tehn Plast Reconstr Surg.2000;7:2–5.
19.
LeddyJP. Flexor tendons acute injuries. In: GreenDP, editor. Operative Hand Surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1993. p. 1823–51.
20.
LimBHTsaiTM. The six-strand techniques for flexor tendon repair. Atlas Hand Clin.1996;1:65–76.
21.
ListerG. Indications and techniques for repair of the flexor tendon sheath. Hand Clin.1985;1:85–95.
22.
McLarneyEHoffmanHWolfeSW. Biomechanical analysis of cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg.1999;24A:295–301.
23.
MomoseTAmadioBChufengZ. Suture techniques with high breaking strength and low gliding resistance. Acta Orthop Scand.2001;72:635–41.
24.
O'ConnellSJMooreMMStricklandJWFrazierGTDellPC. Results of zone I and zone II flexor tendon repairs in children. J Hand Surg.1994;19:48–52.
25.
PowellESTrailIA. Forces transmitted along human flexor tendons during passive and active movements of the fingers. J Hand Surg.2004;29:386–9.
26.
RisperDGreenwaldDShmwaySAllanCMassD. Efficiency of the flexor tendon pulley system in human cadaver hands. J Hand Surg.1996;21A:444–50.
27.
RosbergHECarlssonKSHojgardS. What determines the costs of repair and rehabilitation of flexor tendon injuries in zone II? A multiple regression analysis of data from Southern Sweden. J Hand Surg.2003;28B:106–12.
28.
SandowMJMcMahonMM. Single-cross grasp six-strand repair for acute flexor tendon tenorraphy. Atlas of the Hand Clinics.1996;1:41–64.
29.
SavageRRisitanoG. Flexor tendon repair using a <six-strand> method of repair and early active mobilisation. J Hand Surg.1989;14:396–9.
30.
StricklandJWGlogovacSV. Digital function following flexor tendon repair in zone II: a comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques. J Hand Surg.1980;5:537–43.
31.
TangJB. Clinical outcomes associated with flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin.2005;21:199–210.
32.
TangJB. Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in zone 2. J Hand Surg.2007;32E:118–29.
33.
TangJBGuYTRiceK. Evaluation of four methods of flexor tendon repair for postoperative active mobilization. Plast Reconstr Surg.2001;107:742–9.
34.
TangJBShiDGuYQ. Double and multiple looped suture tendon repair. J Hand Surg.1994;19:699–703.
35.
TomainoMMitsionisGBasitidasJGrewalRPfaeffleJ. The effect of partial excision of the A2 and A4 pulleys on the biomechanics of finger flexion. J Hand Surg.1998;23B:50–2.
36.
TrailIAPowellESNobleJ. The mechanical strength of various suture techniques. J Hand Surg.1992;17B:89–91.
37.
UrbaniakJRCahillJrMortensonRA. Tendon suturing methods: analysis of tensile strength. In: HunterJMSchneiderLH, editors. Symposium on Tendon Surgery in the Hand. St. Louis, CV Mosby: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1975. p. 70–80.
38.
WangBXieRGTangJB. Biomechanical analysis of a modification of Tang method of tendon repair. J Hand Surg.2003;28B:347–50.
