Measurement of Ulnar Variance on Uncalibrated Digital Radiographic Images

Abstract

Uncalibrated digital radiographs used in multicenter trials hinder quantitative measures such as articular step and ulnar variance. This investigation tested the reliability of alternative measures of ulnar variance that are scaled to the length of the capitate. A sample of 30 sets of radiographs from patients enrolled in a prospective study of operative treatment of fractures of the distal radius were blinded and randomized. Five observers measured the ulnar variance (UV) and longitudinal length of the capitate (CH) on two separate occasions with greater than 2 weeks between measurements. During each measurement session, the observers made the measurements on both a calibrated and a noncalibrated workstation. The ratio of the ulnar variance to the length of capitate was calculated (UV/CH ratio). Paired t tests were used to compare two rounds of measurements for both methods. Intra- and interobserver reliability was assessed by the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients. The ratios were compared using analysis of variance with a Bonferroni correction. The intraobserver reliability was excellent for each of the three variables (UV, CH, UV/CH ratio) for each workstation. The interobserver reliability of the UV/CH ratios obtained for each workstation was moderate to excellent as judged by the Pearson correlations between observers. The Bland—Altman method indicated a mean difference in UV/CH between calibrated and uncalibrated measurement techniques of 0.002 with limits of agreement of -0.11 to 0.11. Measurements of ulnar variance that are scaled to the length of the capitate may be useful measures of deformity in studies that utilize uncalibrated digital radiographs.