Scaphoid Excision with Four-Corner Fusion: A Biomechanical Study

Abstract

Purpose

Partial wrist arthrodesis is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of posttraumatic wrist arthritis because of its ability to provide pain relief without sacrificing complete wrist motion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the redistribution of force after four-corner fusion and scaphoid excision, and to correlate the findings with the reported clinical outcomes.

Methods

Fifteen cadaveric wrists were used to study the biomechanics of the four-corner fusion. Pressure-sensitive film (super-low-pressure-indicating film—Pressurex, Sensor Products Inc, Madison, NJ) was inserted into the radiocarpal joint. Using the MTS 858 Mini Bionix (MTS System, Eden Prairie, MN), 50-kg loads (220 N) were applied to the wrists before and after simulated four-corner fusion and scaphoid excision. Statistically, we compared the pressure in the normal (intact) wrists versus four-corner fusion and scaphoid excision. The pressure measurements across the scaphoid fossa, lunate fossa, and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) were compared.

Results

There is a statistical significant difference between scaphoid, lunate, and TFCC mean total force when pre and post-fusion were compared (p=0.0001). Our study revealed a statistical significant decrease in the mean scaphoid total force after scaphoid excision and four-corner fusion (p=0.0001). We also found a subsequent increase in mean total force after scaphoid excision and four-corner fusion for the lunate fossa that did not reach statistical significance (p=0.08), and no difference in load across the TFCC area (p=0.995).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that load is preferentially transferred to the radiolunate joint after scaphoid excision with four-corner fusion.

Keywords

Wrist joint Arthodesis Biomechanics Four-corner fusion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Ashmead

Watson

. SLAC wrist reconstruction. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery. In: Gelberman

, editor. The wrist. New York: Raven Press; 1994. p. 319–30.

2 Ashmead

Watson

Damon

Herber

Paly

. Scapholunate advanced collapse wrist salvage. J Hand Surg 1994;19A:741–50.

3 Cohen

Kozin

. Degenerative arthritis of the wrist: proximal row carpectomy versus scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis. J Hand Surg 2001;26(1):94–104.

4 Goldfarb

Stern

Kiefhaber

. Palmar midcarpal instability: the results of treatment with four-corner arthrodesis. J Hand Surg 2004;29(2):258–63.

5 Kobza

Budoff

Yeh

. Management of the scaphoid during four-corner fusion—a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg 2003;28(6):904–9.

6 Krakauer

Bishop

Cooney

. Surgical treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse. J Hand Surg 1994;19(5):751–9.

7 Tomaino

Miller

Cole

Burton

. Scapholunate advanced collapse wrist: proximal row carpectomy or limited wrist arthrodesis with scaphoid excision? J Hand Surg 1994;19A:134–42.

8 Viegas

Patterson

. Load mechanics of the wrist. Hand Clinics 1997;13(1):109–28.

9 Viegas

Patterson

Peterson

Roefs

Tencer

Choi

. The effects of various load paths and different loads on the load transfer characteristics of the wrist. J Hand Surg 1989 May;14 (3):458–65.

10.

10 Viegas

Patterson

Werner

. Joint contact area and pressure. In: An

K-N

Berger

Cooney

III , editors. Biomechanics of the wrist joint. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York; 1991. p. 99–126.

11.

11 Watson

Ballet

. The SLAC wrist: scapholunate advanced collapse pattern of degenerative arthritis. J Hand Surg 1984;9 (3):358–65.

12.

12 Watson

Goodman

Johnson

. Limited writ arthrodesis. Part II: Intercarpal and radiocarpal combinations. J Hand Surg 1981;6:223–33.

13.

13 Wyrick

Stern

Kiefhaber

. Motion-preserving procedures in the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse wrist: proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis. J Hand Surg 1995; 20A:965–70.