This is a prospective review of 135 HA-coated ABG I total hip arthroplasty (THA) systems with a mean clinical and radiographic follow-up of 8.5 years. The 5-year survival rate was 85%, but 22% of the patients were dissatisfied. Revision THA was already indicated in 28% of the patients, with 26% indicated for cup loosening. PE wear was detected by x-ray in 42%. Disproportionate substantial wear with an average linear loss of 2.6 mm at the inner rim of the insert was observed in 23% of the cases. The mean annual wear rate was calculated 0.1–0.25 mm/year. Laboratory examination of the retrieved PE revealed polishing, cracks, and subsurface delamination. Radiographic evidence of acetabular cysts were found to be excessive granuloma during surgery. Polarization microscopy revealed debris particles phagocytized by reticuloendothelial cells. Results confirm the general opinion that aseptic osteolysis is a cell-mediated process driven by the presence of particles generated from wear debris. The findings also suggest that the main reasons for the failure of the first-generation ABG hip system were an insufficient locking mechanism and poor PE congruency, and not solely poor PE quality.
GeesinkRGde GrootKKleinCPBonding of bone to apatite-coated implantsJ Bone Jt Surg Br19887017–22
2.
ToninoAOosterboosCRahmyAThèrinMDoyleCHydroxyapatite-coated acetabular componentsJ Bone Jt Surg Am200183817–825
3.
BloebaumRDBachusKNRubmanMHDorrLDPostmortem comparative analysis of titanium and hydroxyapatite porous-coated femoral implants retrieved from the same patientJ Arthroplast19938203–21110.1016/S0883-5403(06)80033-1
4.
FurlongROsbornJFFixation of hip prosthesis by hydroxyapatite ceramic coatingsJ Bone Jt Surg Br1991735741–745
5.
LaineHJPuolakkaTJMoilanenTPajamakiKJWirtaJLehtoMUThe effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on ‘fit-and-fill’ characteristics and on bone remodellingInt Orthop2000244184–19010.1007/s002640000150
6.
van RietbergenBHuiskesRLoad transfer and stress shielding of the hydroxyapatite-ABG hip: a study of stem length and proximal fixationJ Arthroplast2001168155–6310.1054/arth.2001.28369
7.
d'AntonioJACapelloWNManleyMTRemodeling of bone around hydroxyapatite coated femoral stemsJ Bone Jt Surg Am1996781226
8.
HarrisWHTraumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluationJ Bone Jt Surg Am196951737–755
9.
Merle d'AubignéRPastelMFunctional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesisJ Bone Jt Surg Am195436451–475
10.
RossiPSibelliPFumeroSCruaEShort-term results of hydroxyapatite-coated primary total hip arthroplastyClin Orthop199531098–102
11.
Garcia AraujoCFernandez GonzalezJToninoARheumatoid arthritis and hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses: five-year results. International ABG Study GroupJ Arthroplast1998136660–66710.1016/S0883-5403(98)80010-7
12.
Nourissat C (2000) Results with the ABG HA cup after over 10 years. Presented at the International Symposium “Charnley 2000,” Lyon, France, December
13.
ToninoAJRahmyAIThe hydroxyapatite-ABG hip system: 5- to 7-year results from an international multicentre study. The International ABG Study GroupJ Arthroplast2000153274–28210.1016/S0883-5403(00)90486-8
14.
MalchauHHerbertsPEislerTGarellickGSodermanPThe Swedish Total Hip Replacement RegisterJ Bone Jt Surg Am200284-ASuppl 22–20
15.
PuolakkaTJPajamakiKJHalonenPJPulkkinenPOPaavolainenPNevalainenJKThe Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the hip registerActa Orthop Scand2001725433–44110.1080/000164701753532745
16.
Blacha J, Bednarek A, Buma P (2001) Osteolysis around HA-coated press-fit hip prosthesis. Presented at the 5th EFORT congress, Rhodes, Greece, June
17.
GiannikasKADinRSadiqSDunninghamTHMedium-term results of the ABG total hip arthroplasty in young patientsJ Arthroplast2002172184–18810.1054/arth.2002.29394
18.
RogersAKulkarniRDownesEMThe ABG hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis: one hundred consecutive operations with average 6-year follow-upJ Arthroplast2003185619–62510.1016/S0883-5403(03)00208-0
19.
MorscherEWHeftiAAebiUSevere osteolysis after third-body wear due to hydroxyapatite particles from acetabular cup coatingJ Bone Jt Surg Br1998802267–27210.1302/0301-620X.80B2.8316
20.
WitkiewiczHVidovszkyTTurnerRTRockMGMorreyBFBolanderMEFate of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW-PE) wear debris in patients with hip implantsTech Orthop199384254–26110.1097/00013611-199300840-00006
21.
PooleCEPatilSSd'LimaDDColwellCWEarly follow-up for a hybrid total hip arthroplasty using a metal-backed acetabular component designed to reduce “backside” polyethylene wearHSSJ20051131–3410.1007/s11420-005-0102-6
22.
CharnleyJHalleyDKRate of wear in total hip replacementClin Orthop1975112170–179
23.
IlchmannTMjobergBWingstrandHMeasurement accuracy in acetabular cup wear. Three retrospective methods compared with Roentgen stereophotogrammetryJ Arthroplast1995105636–64210.1016/S0883-5403(05)80208-6
24.
SarmientoAGruenTARadiographic analysis of a low-modulus titanium-alloy femoral total hip component. Two to six-year follow-upJ Bone Jt Surg Am198567148–56
25.
DeLeeJGCharnleyJRadiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacementClin Orthop197612120–32
26.
JohnstonRCFitzgeraldRHHarrisWHPossRMullerMESledgeCBClinical and radiological evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting resultsJ Bone Jt Surg Am199072161–168
27.
LewinnekGELewisJLTarrRCompereCLZimmermanJRDislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplastiesJ Bone Jt Surg Am1978602217–220
28.
DuffyPSherJLPartingtonPFPremature wear and osteolysis in an HA-coated uncemented total hip arthroplastyJ Bone Jt Surg Br200486134–38
29.
Insley G, Jones E, Streicher R (2001) Risk factors for wear of first generation modular acetabular cups. 5th EFORT congress, Rhodes, Greece, June 3–7
30.
MuratogluOKGreenbaumESBragdonCRJastyMFreibergAAHarrisWHSurface analysis of early retrieved acetabular polyethylene liners—a comparison of conventional and highly crosslinked polyethylenesJ Arthroplast200419168–7710.1016/j.arth.2003.08.003
31.
SmithSLAshHEUnsworthAA tribological study of UHMWPE acetabular cups and polyurethane compliant layer acetabular cupsJ Biomed Mater Res2000536710–71610.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:6<710::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-R
32.
WirtzDCSchopphoffEWeichertDNiethardFUStretched polyethylene (UHMWPE)—a new substance modification for minimizing wear in artificial knee joint replacementBiomed Tech20014612338–34210.1515/bmte.2001.46.12.338
33.
StreicherRMThomsenMPolyethylene as an implant materialOrthopade200332123–3110.1007/s00132-002-0409-7
