The current article argues that the labor pattern of black women may be properly viewed within a trisectoral segmentation of the labor market. A three-phase characterization of their relative earnings behavior over the postwar period is implied. Empirical evidence lends support to the basic hypothesis of an acceleration in black female earnings growth, relative to white males and females, during the intermediate post-1964 period, but a decline thereafter. The quadratic trend model and its logistic transformation were found to fit the earnings patterns rather well. Projections based upon these models suggest that present trends do not bode well for major gains in black female median earnings relative to those of white men and women in the near future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BielbyWilliam R. and BaronJames M.. “A Woman's Place is With Other Women: Sex Segregation Within Organizations.” In ReskinBarbara F., ed., Sex Segregation in the Workplace, (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1984), pp. 27–55.
2.
FrancineBlau and HendricksWallace. “Occupational Segregation by Sex: Trends and prospects.”Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 14, No. 2 (1978), pp. 197–210.
3.
BriefA.D. and AldagL.J.. “Male-Female Differences in Occupational Attitudes Within Minority Groups.”Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 6 (1975), pp. 305–314.
4.
CharlesBrown. “Black-White Earnings Ratios since the Civil Rights Act of 1964: The Importance of Labor Market Dropouts.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 99, No. 1 (February, 1984), pp. 31–44.
5.
RichardButler and HeckmanJames J.“The Government's Impact on the Labor Market Status of Black Americans: A Critical Review.” In HausmanLeonard, , eds., Equal Rights and Industrial Relations, (Madison, Wisconsin: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1977), pp. 235–281.
6.
GlenCain. “The Challenge of Segmented Labor Market Theories to Orthodox Theory: A Survey.”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 14, No. 4 (December 1976), pp. 1215–1257.
7.
DarityWilliam A. and MyersSamuel L.. “Changes in Black-White Income Inequality, 1968–1978: A Decade of Progress?”Review of Black Political Economy, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Summer, 1980), pp. 354–379.
8.
DoeringerPeter B. and PioreMichael J.. International Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1971).
9.
PaulaEngland. “Assessing Trends in Occupational Sex Segregation, 1900–1976.” In BergIvan, ed., Sociological Perspectives on Labor Markets (New York: Academic Press, 1981), pp. 273–295.
10.
FosuA.K.“Explaining Post-1964 Earnings Gains by Black Women: Race or Sex?”Review of Black Political Economy, Vol. 15, No. 3 (Winter 1987), pp. 41–55.
11.
FreemanRichard B.“Time Series Evidence on Black Economic Progress: Shifts in Demand or in Supply?” Discussion Paper No. 632, Harvard University (July 1978).
12.
FreemanRichard B., “Changes in the Labor Market for Black Americans, 1948–1972,”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1 (1973), pp. 67–131.
13.
MariniMargaret M. and BrintonMary C.. “Sex Typing in Occupational Socialization.” In ReskinBarbara F., ed., Sex Segregation in the Workplace, (Washington, D.C.: 1984), pp. 192–232.
14.
RayMarshall. “The Economics of Racial Discrimination: A Survey.”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 12, No. 3 (September 1974), pp. 849–871.
15.
MedoffJames L.“Layoffs and Alternatives Under Trade Unions in U.S. Manufacturing.”American Economic Review, Vol. 69 (June 1979), pp. 380–395.
16.
RegisterCharles A.“Racial Employment and Earnings Differentials: The Impact of Reagan Administration.”Review of Black Political Economy, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Summer 1986), pp. 59–69.
17.
RoosPatricia A. and ReskinBarbara F.. “Institutional Factors Contributing to Sex Segregation in the Workplace.” In ReskinBarbara F., ed., Sex Segregation in the Workplace (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1984), pp. 235–260.
18.
GregoryWilliams. “The Changing U.S. Labor Force and Occuptional Differentiation by Sex.”Demography, Vol. 16 (1979), pp. 73–88.
