Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2000-12
Are Learning Outcomes in Economics Different at Predominantly Black and White Universities? Lessons from Principles of Macroeconomics Courses at two Schools
AgesaJ., GrangerM., Priceand G. N.. 1999. Economics faculty research at teaching institutions: Are historically black colleges and universities different? Paper presented at the National Economic Association (NEA) Meetings, (January): New York, NY. [Forthcoming, Southern Economic Journal]
2.
AndersonG., BenjaminW., Fussand M. A.. 1994. The determinants of success in university introductory economics courses. Journal of Economic Education25(Spring): 99–119.
3.
BartlettR. L., 1996. Discovering diversity in introductory economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives10(Spring): 141–53.
4.
BartlettR. L., Feinerand S.. 1992. Balancing the economics curriculum: Content, method, and pedagogy. American Economic Review80(May): 559–64.
5.
BeckerW. E.1983. Economic education research: Part III, statistical estimation methods. Journal of Economic Education14(Summer): 4–15.
6.
BeckerW. E.1997. Teaching economics to undergraduates. Journal of Economic Literature35(September): 1347–73.
7.
BeckerW. E., PowersJ. R., Saundersand P.. 1997. Problems of missing student data and the importance of class size in student achievement. Unpublished paper.
8.
CataneseA.V.1991. Faculty role models and diversifying the gender and racial mix of undergraduate economics majors. Journal of Economic Education22(Summer): 276–84.
9.
CollinsSusan M.2000. Minority groups in the economics profession. Journal of Economic Perspectives14(Spring): 133–148.
10.
Digest of Education Statistics, 1998.1999. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, NCES 1999036. [Online: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=1999036]
11.
HeathJ. A.1989. An econometric model of the role of gender in economic education. American Economic Review79(May): 226–30.
12.
Institutional Profiles, University of North Carolina, 1998–99 Edition, Program Assessment and Public Service Division, University of North Carolina-General Administration. [Online: http://www.ga.unc.edu/publications/]
13.
JonesB.1988. NEA address: Economics programs at historically black colleges and universities. Review of Black Political Economy16(Winter): 5–14.
14.
KennedyP. E.1986. Interpreting dummy variables. The Review of Economics and Statistics16(1): 174–75.
15.
KennedyP. E.1994. How much bias from using pretest as a regressor?, Unpublished paper, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC, Canada.
16.
KennedyP. E., Siegfriedand J. J.. 1997. Class size and achievement in introductory economics: Evidence from the TUCE III data. Economics of Education Review16(4): 385–94.
17.
LageM. J., Tregliaand M.. 1996. The impact of integrating scholarship on women into introductory economics: Evidence from one institution. Journal of Economic Education27(Winter): 26–36.
18.
LumsdenK. G., Scottand A.. 1987. The economics student reexamined: Male-female differences in comprehension. Journal of Economic Education21(Summer): 355–63.
19.
MaxwellN., Lopusand J. S.. 1994. The Lake Wobegon effect in student self-reported data. American Economic Review84(May): 201–05.
20.
RuffinsP.1996. African American economists: An ‘elite clan of warrior intellectuals.’African American Issues in Higher Education. (November 14): 18–24.
21.
SiegfriedJ. J., BartlettR. L., HansenW. L., KelleyA. C., McCloskeyD. N., Tietenburgand T. H.. 1991. The status and prospects of the economics major. Journal of Economic Education22(Summer): 197–224.
22.
SuitsD. B.1984. Dummy variables: Mechanics v. interpretation. The Review of Economics and Statistics66(February): 177–80.