Theory-based studies claim that informal processes interfere with the formal mechanisms and structures of projects in the construction sector. These processes structure and transform multi-organizations. This four-year case study reveals empirical evidence about how processes effectively evolve over time and affect formal mechanisms and structures. The results show: (1) the significant differences between what is planned and what actually unfolds in project processes; (2) how iterative processes overshadow linear ones; (3) how informality and “iterativity” eventually end up as self-, eco-, and re-organizing projects and organizations, confirming that projects (re)create the very processes and structures that initiate them.
BaccariniD. (1996). The concept of project complexity: A review.International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201–204.
2.
BarrettP., & SutrisnaM. (2009). Methodological strategies to gain insights into informality and emergence in construction project case studies.Construction Management & Economics, 27(10), 935–948.
3.
BengtssonM., MüllernT., SöderholmA., & WahlinN. (2007). A grammar of organizing.Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
4.
BolandR. J. J., & CollopyF. (2004a). Design matters for management. In BolandR. J. J., & CollopyF. (Eds.), Managing as designing (pp. 3–18). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
BolandR. J. J., & CollopyF. (Eds.). (2004b). Managing as designing.Stanford, CA: Stanford. University Press.
6.
BonamiM., De HenninB., BoquéJ. M., & LegrandJ. J. (1996). Management des systèmes complexes, Pensée systémique et intervention dans les organisations.Bruxelles, Belgique: De Boeck Université.
7.
BoutinetJ.-P. (1990). Anthropologie du projet (3ième ed.). Paris, France: Quadrige.
8.
BoutinetJ.-P. (2010). Grammaire des conduites à projet.Paris, France: PUF.
9.
BrownT. (2009). Change by design.New York, NY: Harper Collins.
10.
BryantD. T., FosterP. M., SpinkP. K., & LuckmanJ. (1978). Multiorganizational relationships on large building sites and their influence on morale and effectiveness.Construction Management & Economics, Doc. No. COOR 91/2 T424.
11.
ChernsA. B., & BryantD. T. (1984). Studying the client's role in construction management.Construction Management & Economics, 2(2), 177–184.
12.
ChinyioE., & OlomolaiyeP. O. (Eds.). (2010). Construction stakeholder management.Oxford, England: Wiley.
13.
CleggS. R., CynthiaA., LawrenceT. B., & NordW. (Eds.). (2006). The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
14.
ClelandD. I., & IrelandL. R. (2006). Project management: Strategic design and implementation.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
15.
CooperR. G. (1994). Perspective third-generation new product processes.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(1), 3–14.
16.
CooperR., AhouadG., LeeA., WuS., FlemingA., & KaglioglouN. (2004). Process management in design and construction.Oxford, England: Blackwell.
17.
CrawfordL., CostelloK., PollackJ., & BentleyL. (2003). Managing soft change projects in the public sector.International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 443–448.
18.
CrossN. (Ed.). (2006). Designerly ways of knowing.London, England: Springer.
19.
CrossN. (2007). Forty years of design research.Design Studies, 28(1), 1–4.
20.
Davidson FrameJ. (2002). The new project management: Tools for an age of rapid change, complexity and other business realities.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
de BloisM. (2010, July 7–9). The challenges of information transfer between the client organization and the temporary multi-organization (TMO). Paper presented at the DRS 2010, Design Research Society, Montreal, Canada.
22.
de BloisM. (2012). Le projet organisant: Vers une ontologie du projet d'aménagement (Unpublished thèse, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada).
23.
de BloisM., & De ConinckP. (2008, November 4–8). The dynamics of actors’ and stakeholders’ participation (ASP): An approach of management by design. Paper presented at the CIB-W096, Design Management in AEC, São Paulo, Brazil.
24.
de BloisM., & De ConinckP. (2009). The dynamics of actors’ and stakeholders’ participation (ASP): An approach of management by design.Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 176–188.
25.
de BloisM., HerazoB.-C., LatunovaI., & LizarraldeG. (2010). Relationships between construction clients and participants of the building industry: Structures and mechanisms of coordination and communication.Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(2010), 1–20.
26.
de BloisM., & LizarraldeG. (2010, May 10–13). A system of classification of temporary multi-organizations in the building sector. Paper presented at the CIB world building congress 2010, Salford, England.
27.
DemersC. (2007). Organizational change theories: A synthesis.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
DorstK. (1997). Describing design: A comparision of paradigms.TUDelft, The Netherlands.
29.
DorstK. (2011). The core of “design thinking” and its application.Design Studies, 32, 521–532.
30.
DorstK., & CrossN. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution.Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437.
31.
DurandD. (2004). La systémique (9ième ed., 1795). Vendôme, France: Presse Universitaire de France.
32.
EdwardsD. J., & HoltG. D. (2010). The case for “3D triangulation” when applied to construction management research.Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 10(1), 25–41.
33.
FortinR. (2000). Comprendre la complexité: Introduction à la méthode d'Edgar Morin.Paris, France: L'Harmattan/Presses de l'Université Laval.
34.
GauthierB. (2003). Recherche sociale: De la problématique à la collecte des données.Sainte-Foy, Canada: Presse Universitaire du Québec.
35.
GidadoK. I. (1996). Project complexity: The focal point of construction production planning.Construction Management and Economics, 14(3), 213–225.
36.
GiddensA. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis.Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
37.
HalinenA., & TornroosJ. A. (2005). Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks.Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1285–1297.
38.
HernesT. (2008). Understanding organizations as process: Theory for a tangled world.New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
JacksonM. C. (1995). Beyond the fads: Systems thinking for managers.Systems Research, 12(1), 25–42.
KagioglouM., CooperR., AouadG., & SextonM. (2000). Rethinking construction: The generic design and construction process protocol.Engineering Construction & Architectural Management (Blackwell Publishing Limited), 7(2), 141–153.
KoskelaL., BallardG., & TanhuanpääV.-P. (1997, July 16–17). Towards lean design management. Paper presented at the 5th annual conference of the international group for lean construction IGLC-5, Gold Coast, Australia.
44.
KoskelaL., & HowellG. (2002, August 6–8). The theory of project management: Explanation to novel methods. Proceedings IGLC-10, paper presented at the 10th conference of international group for lean construction, Gramado, Brazil.
45.
KoskelaL., HuovilaP., & LeinonenJ. (2002). Design management in building construction: From theory to practice.Journal of Construction Research, 3(1), 1–16.
46.
Le MoigneJ.-L. (1977). La théorie du système général.Paris, France: Presse Universitaire de France.
47.
Le MoigneJ.-L. (1999). La modélisation des systèmes complexes.Paris, France: Dunod.
48.
LessardD., SakhraniV., & MillerR. (2014). House of project complexity: Understanding complexity in large infrastructure projects.Engineering Project Organization Journal, 4(4), 170–192.
49.
LizarraldeG., de BloisM., & DavidsonC. H. (2011). Relations intra- and inter-organizations for the study of the temporary multi-organization in construction projects.International Journal of Project Organization and Management (IJPOM), 3(11), 57–77.
50.
LizarraldeG., de BloisM., & LatunovaI. (2010). Structuring of temporary multi-organisations: Contingency theory in the building sector.International Journal of Project Management, 42(4), 19–36.
51.
LuhmannN. (2000). Organisation und Entscheidung.Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher.
52.
LuhmannN. (2005). The paradox of decision making. In SeidlD., & BeckerK. H. (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (pp. 9–35). Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
53.
LundinR. A., & SteinthórssonR. S. (2003). Studying organizations as temporary.Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19(2), 233–250.
54.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives (2nd ed.). Paris, France: De Boeck Université.
55.
MintzbergH. (1979). The structuring of organisations.Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56.
MintzbergH. (1983a). Power in and around organizations.New York, NY: Prentice Hall College Division.
57.
MintzbergH. (1983b). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ and Toronto, Canada: Prentice Hall.
58.
MintzbergH., RaisinghaniD., & ThéorêtA. (1976). The structure of “unstructured” decision processes.Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246–275.
59.
MorinE. (1977). La méthode 1: La nature de la nature.Paris, France: Le Seuil.
60.
MorrisJ., RogersonJ., & JaredG. (1999). A tool for modelling the briefing and design decision making processes in construction.Cranfield, England: School of Industrial and Manufacturing Science, Cranfield University.
61.
NelsonH. G., & StöltermanE. (2014). The design way, intentional change in an unpredictable world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. Owen, C. L. (2007). Design thinking: Notes on its nature and use.Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16–17.
62.
PackendorffJ. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research.Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 319–333.
63.
PettigrewA. M. (1997). What is processual analysis?Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337–348.
64.
PollackJ. (2007). The changing paradigms of project management.International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 266–274.
65.
Project Management Institute (PMI) (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) – Fifth edition.Newtown Square, PA: Author.
66.
ProverbsD., & GamesonR. (2008). Case study research. In KnightA., & RuddockL. (Eds.), Advanced research methods in the built environment (pp. 99–110). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
67.
PrykeS., & SmithH. (Eds.). (2006a). The management of complex projects: A relationship approach.Oxford, England: Blackwell.
68.
PrykeS., & SmithH. (2006b). The management of complex projects: A relationship approach. In PrykeS., & SmithH. (Eds.), Scoping a relationship approach to the management of complex projects (pp. 21–45). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
69.
RankO. N. (2008). Formal structures and informal networks: Structural analysis in organizations.Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(2), 145–161.
70.
RittelH. W. J., & WebberM. M. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems. In CrossN. (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 135–144). New York, NY: Wiley.
71.
RoweP. G. (1987). Design thinking.London, England: MIT Press.
72.
ScottW. R. (2012). The institutional environment of global project organizations.Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2(1-2), 27–35.
73.
SeidlD., & BeckerK. H. (2005). Niklas Luhmann and organization studies.Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
74.
SeidlD., & BeckerK. H. (2006). Organizations as distinction generating and processing systems: Niklas Luhmann's contribution to organization studies.Organization, 13(1), 9–35.
75.
ShamiyehM. & Dom Research Laboratory (Eds.). (2010). Creating desired futures: How design thinking innovates business.Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser GmbH.
76.
SimonH. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77.
StringerJ. (1967). Operational research for “multi-organizations.”Operational Research Quarterly, 18(2), 105–120.
78.
ThiryM., & DeguireM. (2007). Recent developments in project-based organisations.International Journal of Project Management, 25(7), 649–658.
79.
Van de VenA. H. (1992). Suggestions for studying the strategy process: A research note.Strategic Management Journal, 13, 169–188.
80.
Van de VenA. H., & PooleM. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations.Academy of Management Review, 510–540.
81.
Van der MarenJ.-M. (1999). La recherche appliquée en pédagogie: Des modèles pour l'enseignement.Paris, France: De Boeck Université.
82.
WalkerA. (2007). Project management in construction (5th ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell. Weick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis.Organization Science, 9(5), 543–555.
83.
WildA. (2002). The unmanageability of construction and the theoretical psycho-social dynamics of projects.Engineering Construction & Architectural Management (Blackwell Publishing Limited), 9(4), 345–351.
84.
WilliamsT. M. (1999). The need for new paradigms for complex projects.International Journal of Project Management, 17(5), 269–273.
85.
WilliamsT. (2005). Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(4), 497–508.
86.
WinchG. M. (2010). Managing construction projects: An information processing approach.Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
87.
WinterM., SmithC., MorrisP., & CicmilS. (2006). Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network.International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 638–649.
88.
WinterM., & SzczepanekT. (2007). Reframing project management: New thinking, new practice.Farnham, England: Gower.
89.
YeoK. T. (1993). Systems thinking and project management: Time to reunite.International Journal of Project Management, 11(2), 111–117.
90.
YinR. K. (2004). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
