Project teams are central to organizations everywhere; however, there is a knowledge gap between project management scholars on the one hand and organizational behavior and industrial–organizational (OB/IO) scholars on the other. This gap seriously impedes the advancement of knowledge, because scholars from both fields have not leveraged each other's considerable knowledge and might be relying on outdated models and evidence to study project team phenomena, manage project teams, or develop university curricula. A call is made for interdisciplinary research projects devoted specifically to developing a research agenda on project teams.
AguinisH., BradleyK. J., & BrodersenA. (2014). Industrial–organizational psychologists in business schools: Brain drain or eye opener?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(3), 284–303. doi: 10.1111/iops.12151
2.
AubryM., HobbsB., & ThuillierD. (2007). A new framework for understanding organisational project management through the PMO.International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 328–336. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.004
3.
BaardS. K., RenchT. A., & KozlowskiS. W. J. (2013). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review.Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206313488210
4.
BakkerR.M. (2010). Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research agenda.International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 466–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1468–2370.2010.00281.x
5.
BellS. T., & MarentetteB.J. (2011). Team viability for long-term and ongoing organizational teams.Organizational Psychology Review, 1(4), 275–292. doi: 10.1177/2041386611405876
6.
BeringerC., JonasD., & Georg GemündenH. (2012). Establishing project portfolio management: An exploratory analysis of the influence of internal stakeholders' interactions.Project Management Journal, 43(6), 16–32. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21307
7.
BesnerC., & HobbsB. (2012). Contextualized project management practice and best practice.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
8.
BettsM., & LansleyP. (1995). International Journal of Project Management: A review of the first ten years.International Journal of Project Management, 13(4), 207–217. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0263–7863(95)00001–7
9.
BredilletC.N. (2002). Proposition of a systemic and dynamic model to align lifelong learning structure: The quest of the missing link between men, team, and organizational learning. In SlevineD. P., ClelandD. I., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), The frontiers of project management research (pp. 73–95). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
10.
BredinK., & SöderlundJ. (2011). The HR quadriad: a framework for the analysis of HRM in project-based organizations.The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(10), 2202–2221. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.580189
11.
BurckC. S., SalasE., & DiazD. (2008). The role of team learning in facilitating team adaptation within complex environments: Tools and strategies. In SessaV. L., & LondonM. (Eds.), Work group learning (pp. 217–241). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
BurkeC. S., StaglK. C., SalasE., PierceL., & KendallD. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model.Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189–1207. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.91.6.1189
13.
CardenL., & EganT. (2008). Does our literature support sectors newer to project management? The search for quality publications relevant to nontraditional industries.Project Management Journal, 39(3), 6–27. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20068
14.
CascioW. F., & AguinisH. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends.Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1062–1081. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.93.5.1062
15.
ChenG., & GogusC.I. (2008). Motivation in and of work teams: A multilevel perspective. In KanferR., ChenG., & PritchardR. D. (Eds.), Work motivation: Past, present, and future (pp. 285–317). New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
ChenG., & KanferR. (2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams.Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 223–267.
17.
ChiocchioF., & EssiembreH. (2009). Cohesion and performance: A meta-analytic review of disparities between project teams, production teams, and service teams.Small Group Research, 40(4), 382–420.
18.
ChiocchioF., & HausdorfP. (2014). The four C's of human resource project teams: Context, configuration, cycles, and challenges. In KlimoskiR., DuganB., MessikomerC., & ChiocchioF. (Eds.), Advancing Human Resource Project Management (pp. 425–466). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
ChiocchioF., KellowayE. K., & HobbsB. (Eds.). (forthcoming).The psychology and management of project teams.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
ChiocchioF., LebelP., TherriaultP.-Y., BoucherA., HassC., RabbatF.-X., & BouchardJ. (2012). Stress and performance in health care project teams.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
21.
ChiocchioF., MessikomerC., HobbsB., AllenN., & LamersonC. (2011, April 14–16). ‘Human factors’ in project management research: Where is I/O psychology? Paper presented at the 26th annual Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Chicago, IL.
22.
CicmilS., Cooke-DaviesT. J., CrawfordL., & RichardsonK. (2009). Exploring the complexity of projects: Implications of complexity theory for project management practice.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
23.
CohenS. G., & BaileyD.E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite.Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290.
24.
CrawfordL., & PollackJ. (2004). Hard and soft projects: A framework for analysis.International Journal of Project Management, 22(8), 645–653.
25.
CrawfordL., PollackJ., & EnglandD. (2006). Uncovering the trends in project management: Journal emphases over the last 10 years.International Journal of Project Management, 24, 175–184.
26.
CreasyT., & AnantatmulaV.S. (2013). From every direction—How personality traits and dimensions of project managers can conceptually affect project success.Project Management Journal, 44(6), 36–51. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21372
27.
DietrichP., KujalaJ., & ArttoK. (2013). Inter-team coordination patterns and outcomes in multi-team projects.Project Management Journal, 44(6), 6–19. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21377
28.
DyeK., MillsA. J., & WeatherbeeT. (2005). Maslow: man interrupted: Reading management theory in context.Management Decision, 43(10), 1375–1395. doi: 10.1108/00251740510634921
29.
EllisA. P. J., HollenbeckJ. R., IlgenD. R., PorterC. O. L. H., WestB. J., & MoonH. (2003). Team learning: Collectively connecting the dots.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 821–835.
30.
GagnéM. (2014). The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
GagnéM., & DeciE.L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.
32.
GemündenH.G. (2013, June 16–17). Trends in project management research: A comparison of research published in PMJ and IJPM in 2000–2011. Paper presented at the 11th bi-annual conference of the International Research Network on Organizing by Projects, Oslo, Norway.
33.
GhapanchiA. H., & AurumA. (2012). The impact of project capabilities on project performance: Case of open source software projects.International Journal of Project Management, 30(4), 407–417. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.10.002
34.
HackmanR.J. (1987). The design of work teams. In LorschJ. W. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35.
HenrieM., & Sousa-PozaA. (2005). Project management: A cultural literary review.Project Management Journal, 36(2), 5–14.
36.
HobbsB., & AubryM. (2010). The project management office (PMO): A quest for understanding.Washington, DC: Project Management Institute.
37.
HoeglM., ErnstH., & ProserpioL. (2007). How teamwork matters more as team member dispersion increases.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(2), 156–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1540–5885.2007.00240.x
38.
HoeglM., & GemündenH.G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence.Organization Science, 12(4), 435–449.
39.
HoeglM., & ParboteeahK.P. (2003). Goal setting and team performance in innovative projects: On the moderating role of teamwork quality.Small Group Research, 34(1), 3–19. doi: 10.1177/1046496402239575
40.
HoeglM., & ParboteeahK.P. (2006a). Autonomy and teamwork in innovative projects.Human Resource Management, 45(1), 67–79.
41.
HoeglM., & ParboteeahK.P. (2006b). Team reflexivity in innovative projects.R&D Management, 36(2), 113–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–9310.2006.00420.x
42.
HoeglM., WeinkaufK., & GemündenH.G. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study.Organization Science, 15(1), 38–55.
43.
IlgenD. R., HollenbeckJ. R., JohnsonM., & JundtD. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models.Annual Reviews in Psychology, 56, 517–543.
44.
JohnsG. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior.Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408.
45.
JugdevK., MathurG., & FungT.S. (2007). Project management assets and their relationship with the project management capability of the firm.International Journal of Project Management, 25(6), 560–568. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.009
46.
KeeganA., HuemannM., & TurnerJ.R. (2011). Beyond the line: Exploring the HRM responsibilities of line managers, project managers and the HRM department in four project-oriented companies in the Netherlands, Austria, the UK and the USA.The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(15), 3085–3104. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.610937
47.
KleinC. (2012). Research will evolve, but we must do a better job of translating what we already know.Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 52–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1754–9434.2011.01405.x
KloppenborgT. J., & OpferW.A. (2002). Forty years of project management research: Trends, interpretations, and predictions. In SlevineD. P., ClelandD. I., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), The frontiers of project management research (pp. 3–29). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
50.
KozlowskiS. W. J., & BellB.S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In BormanW. C., IlgenD. R., KlimoskiR., & WeinerI. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). London, England: Wiley.
51.
KozlowskiS. W. J., ChaoG. T., GrandJ. A., BraunM. T., & KuljaninG. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence.Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 581–615. doi: 10.1177/1094428113493119
52.
KozlowskiS. W. J., GullyS. M., NasonE. R., & SmithE.M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In PulakosE. D., & IlgenD. R. (Eds.), The changing nature of performance (pp. 240–292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53.
KozlowskiS. W. J., & KleinK.J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In KleinK. K., & KozlowskiS.W.J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
KwakY. H., & AnbariF.T. (2009). Analyzing project management research: Perspectives from top management journals.International Journal of Project Management, 27(5), 435–446. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.08.004
55.
LalondeP.-L., BourgaultM., & FindeliA. (2010). Building pragmatist theories of PM practice: Theorizing the act of project management.Project Management Journal, 41(5), 21–36. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20163
56.
LockeE. A., & LathamG.P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation.American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.
57.
MarksM. A., DeChurchL. A., MathieuJ. E., PanzerF. J., & AlonsoA. (2005). Teamwork in multiteam systems.Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 964–971. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.90.5.964
58.
MarksM. A., MathieuJ. E., & ZaccaroS.J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes.Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.
59.
MathieuJ. E., MaynardM. T., RappT., & GilsonL. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future.Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061
60.
MaylorH., VidgenR., & CarverS. (2008). Managerial complexity in project-based operations: A grounded model and its implications for practice.Project Management Journal, 39(S1), S15–S26. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20057
61.
McGrathJ.E. (Ed.). (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
62.
MohammedS., HamiltonK., & LimA. (2009). The incorporation of time in team research: Past, current, and future. In SalasE., GoodwinG. G., & BurkeC. S. (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations (pp. 321–348). New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
MorgesonF. P., & HofmannD.A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development.The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249–265.
64.
MorrisP. W. G., PintoJ. K., & SöderlundJ. (2011). Towards the third wave of project management. In MorrisP.W.G., PintoJ. K., & SöderlundJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 1–11). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
65.
MüllerR., & TurnerR. (2007). The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project.European Management Journal, 25(4), 298–309. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2007.06.003
66.
NeherA. (1991). Maslow's theory of motivation: A critique.Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 31(3), 89–112. doi: 10.1177/0022167891313010
67.
PardoT. A., & SchollH.J. (2002). Walking atop the cliffs: Avoiding failure and reducing risk in large scale e-government projects.Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1656–1665. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2002.994076
68.
PichM. T., LochC. H., & MeyerA.D. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management.Management Science, 48(8), 1008–1023. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163
69.
PintoJ. K., & MantelS. J.Jr. (1990). The causes of project failure.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(4), 269–276.
70.
Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) - Fifth edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.
71.
Project Management Institute. (2014). 2013 Annual report.Newtown Square, PA: Author.
72.
RaudenbushS. W., & BrykA.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
SalasE., PriestH. A., StaglK. C., SimsD., & BurkeS. (2007). Work teams in organizations: A historical reflection and lessons learned. In KoppesL. L. (Ed.), Historical perspectives in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 407–438). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
75.
SalazarM. R., LantT. K., FioreS. M., & SalasE. (2012). Facilitating innovation in diverse science teams through integrative capacity.Small Group Research, 43(5), 527–558. doi: 10.1177/1046496412453622
76.
SchmidB., & AdamsJ. (2008). Motivation in project management: The project manager's perspective.Project Management Journal, 39(2), 60–71. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20042
77.
SlevinD. P., & PintoJ.K. (2007). An overview of behavioral issues in project management. In MorrisP.W.G., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), The Wiley guide to project organization & project management competencies (pp. 1–19). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
78.
SöderlundJ. (2004). On the broadening scope of the research on projects: A review and a model for analysis.International Journal of Project Management, 22(8), 655–667. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.011
79.
SteinerI.D. (1972). Group process and productivity.New York, NY: Academic Press.
80.
StokolsD., HallK. L., MoserR. P., FengA., MisraS., & TaylorB.K. (2012). Cross-disciplinary team science initiatives: Research, training, and translation. In FrodemanR., KleinJ. T., & MitchamC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 471–493). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
81.
SzostakR. (2012). Transcending discipline-based library classifications. In FrodemanR., KleinJ. T., & MitchamC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 180–181). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
82.
TannenbaumS. I., MathieuJ. E., SalasE., & CohenD. (2012a). On teams: Unifying themes and the way ahead.Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 56–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1754–9434.2011.01406.x
83.
TannenbaumS. I., MathieuJ. E., SalasE., & CohenD. (2012b). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2–24. doi: DOI: 10.1111/j.1754–9434.2011.01396.x
84.
TasaK., SearsG. J., & SchatA. C. H. (2011). Personality and teamwork behavior in context: The cross-level moderating role of collective efficacy.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 65–85. doi: 10.1002/job.680
ThomasJ., & MengelT. (2008). Preparing project managers to deal with complexity: Advanced project management education.International Journal of Project Management, 26(3), 304–315. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.01.001
87.
ThomasJ., & MullalyM. (2007). Understanding the value of project management: First steps on an international investigation in search of value.Project Management Journal, 38(3), 74–89. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20007
88.
TurnerR. (2010). Evolution of project management research as evidenced by papers published in the International Journal of Project Management.International Journal of Project Management, 28(1), 1–6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.10.009
89.
TurnerR., HuemannM., & KeeganA. (Eds.). (2008). Human Resource Management in the Project-Oriented Organization.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
90.
TyssenA. K., WaldA., & SpiethP. (2013). Leadership in temporary organizations: A review of leadership theories and a research agenda.Project Management Journal, 44(6), 52–67. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21380
91.
VidalL.-A., MarleF., & BocquetJ.-C. (2011). Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 718–727. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.005
92.
WahbaM. A., & BridwellL.G. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15(2), 212–240. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030–5073(76)90038–6
93.
WiewioraA., MurphyG., TrigunarsyahB., & BrownK. (2014). Interactions between organizational culture, trustworthiness, and mechanisms for inter-project knowledge sharing.Project Management Journal, 45(2), 48–65. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21407
94.
ZaccaroS. J., MarksM. A., & DeChurchL.A. (Eds.). (2011). Multiteam systems.New York, NY: Routledge.
95.
ZahraS. A., & NeweyL.R. (2009). Maximizing the impact of organization science: Theory-building at the intersection of disciplines and/or fields.Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1059–1075. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–6486.2009.00848.x
96.
ZickarM. J., & HighhouseS. (2001). Measuring prestige of journals in industrial-organizational psychology.TIP—The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 38(4), 29–36.
