This study examines the relationships between corporate innovation culture (analysis/practices) and dimensions of project portfolio success (strategic fit/portfolio balance) as well as national-level culture practices as moderators. Data (N = 165) were collected in four countries differing in cultural practices. Analysis and practices were identified as positive, significant, and complementary predictors of both dimensions. As hypothesized, the corporate variables related more strongly and positively to the success dimensions when assertiveness was high rather than low. The findings, thus, suggest that corporate factors should be compatible with national culture to elevate the fit and balance of project portfolios.
ArcherN. P., & GhasemzadehF. (1999). An integrated framework for project portfolio selection.International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 207–216.
2.
BiedenbachT., & MüllerR. (2012). Absorptive, innovative and adaptive capabilities and their impact on project and project portfolio performance.International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 621–635.
3.
BlichfeldtB. S., & EskerodP. (2008). Project portfolio management: There's more to it than what management enacts.International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 357–365.
4.
BondM. H., & SmithP.B. (1996). Cross-cultural social and organizational psychology.Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 205–235.
5.
Brentani deU. (2001). Innovative versus incremental new business services: Different keys for achieving success.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(3), 169–187.
6.
de BrentaniU., & KleinschmidtE.J. (2004). Corporate culture and commitment: Impact on performance of international new product development programs.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 309–333.
7.
BrettJ. M., TinselyC. H., JanssensM., BarsnessZ. I., & LytleA.L. (1997). New approaches to the study of culture in industrial/organizational psychology. In EarleyP. C., & ErezM. (Eds.), New Perspectives on International Industrial/Organizational Psychology (pp. 75–128). San Francisco, CA: The New Lexington Press.
8.
Budde-SungA. (2013). The invisible meets the intangible: Culture's impact on intellectual property protection.Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 345–359.
9.
ChaoR. O., & KavadiasS. (2008). A theoretical framework for managing the new product development portfolio: When and how to use strategic buckets.Management Science, 54(5), 907–921.
10.
ChaoR. O., KavadiasS., & GaimonC. (2009). Revenue driven resource allocation: Funding authority, incentives, and new product development portfolio management.Management Science, 55(9), 1556–1569.
11.
CooperR. G., EdgettS. J., & KleinschmidtE.J. (1998). Portfolio management for new products (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
12.
CooperR. G., EdgettS. J., & KleinschmidtE.J. (2000). New problems, new solutions: Making portfolio management more effective.Research Technology Management, 43(2), 18–33.
13.
CooperR. G., EdgettS. J., & KleinschmidtE.J. (2002). Portfolio management: Fundamental to new product success. In BelliveauP., GriffinA., & SomermeyerS. (Eds.), The PDMA toolbook for new product development (pp. 331–364). New York, NY: Wiley.
CooperR. G., & KleinschmidtE.J. (1995). Benchmarking the firm's critical success factors in new product development.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374–391.
17.
CovinJ. G., & SlevinD.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments.Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75–87.
18.
Den HartogD.N. (2004). Assertiveness. In HouseR. J., HangesP. J., JavidanM., DorfmanP. W., & GuptaV. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 395–436). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.
19.
DietrichP., & LehtonenP. (2005). Successful management of strategic intentions through multiple projects—reflections from empirical study: Selected papers from the Sixth Biennial Conference of the International Research Network for Organizing by Projects.International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), 386–391.
20.
EisenbergerR., & RhoadesL. (2001). Incremental effects of reward on creativity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 728–741.
21.
ElenkovD. S., & ManevI.M. (2005). Top management leadership and influence on innovation: The role of sociocultural context.Journal of Management, 31(3), 381–402.
22.
EngwallM. (2003). No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context.Research Policy, 32, 789–808.
23.
FredricksonJ. W., & MitchellT.R. (1984). Strategic decision process: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with a stable environment.Academy of Management Journal, 27, 399–423.
GelfandM., BhawukD., NishiiL., & BechtoldD. (2004). Individualism and collectivism. In HouseR. J., HangesP. J., JavidanM., DorfmanP. W., & GuptaV. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 437–512). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.
26.
GerhartB. (2009). How much does national culture constrain organizational culture?Management and Organization Review, 5(2), 241–259.
27.
GhasemzadehF., & ArcherN.P. (2000). Project portfolio selection through decision support.Decision Support Systems, 29(1), 73–88.
28.
GollI., & RasheedA.M.A. (1997). Rational decision-making and a firm performance: The moderating role of environment.Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 583–591.
29.
GuptaV., & HangesP.J. (2004). Regional and climate clustering of societal cultures. In HouseR. J., HangesP. J., JavidanM., DorfmanP. W., & GuptaV. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 178–218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.
30.
GuptaV., HangesP. J., & DorfmanP. (2002). Cultural clusters: Methodology and findings.Journal of World Business, 37(1), 11–15.
31.
HangesP. J., & DicksonM. (2004). The development and validation of the GLOBE culture and leadership scales. In HouseR. J., HangesP. J., JavidanM., DorfmanP. W., & GuptaV. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 205–218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.
32.
HanischB., & WaldA. (2012). A bibliometric view on the use of contingency theory in project management research.Project Management Journal, 43(3), 4–23.
33.
HeisingW. (2012). The integration of ideation and project portfolio management—A key factor for sustainable success.International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 582–595.
34.
HerreraR., DuncanP. A., GreenM., ReeM., & SkaggsS.L. (2011). The relationship between attitudes toward diversity management in the southwest USA and the GLOBE study cultural preferences.The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(12), 2629–2646.
35.
HobbsB. (2012). Editorial—Special issue on project portfolio management.International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 523–524.
36.
HofstedeG. (1989). Organising for cultural diversity.European Management Journal, 7(4), 390–397.
37.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.
38.
HouseR. J., HangesP. J., JavidanM., DorfmanP. W., & GuptaV. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.
39.
HouseR. J., JavidanM., HangesP. J., & DorfmanP.W. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to the project GLOBE.Journal of World Business, 37, 3–10.
40.
HouseR. J., WrightN. S., & AdityaR.N. (1997). Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory. In EarleyP. C., & ErezM. (Eds.), New Perspectives on International Industrial/Organizational Psychology (pp. 535–625). San Francisco, CA: The New Lexington Press.
41.
HowellJ. M., & HigginsC.A. (1990). Champions of technological innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 317–342.
42.
HowellJ. M., & SheaC.M. (2001). Individual differences, environmental scanning, innovation framing, and champion behavior: Key predictors of project performance.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(1), 15–27.
43.
HowellJ. M., SheaC. M., & HigginsC.A. (2005). Champions of product innovations: Defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior.Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 641–661.
44.
JonasD. (2010). Empowering project portfolio managers: How management involvement impacts project portfolio management performance.International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 818–831.
45.
JonasD. (2011). Project portfolio management: Management involvement and performance of multiple project organizations. Dissertation. Berlin, Germany.
46.
JonasD., KockA., & GemündenH.G. (2013). Predicting project portfolio success by measuring management quality: A longitudinal study.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(2), 215–226.
47.
KabasakalH., & BodurM. (2004). Humane orientation in societies, organizations, and leader attributes. In HouseR. J., HangesP. J., JavidanM., DorfmanP. W., & GuptaV. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 564–601). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.
48.
KillenC. P., & KjaerC. (2012). Understanding project interdependencies: The role of visual representation, culture and process.International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 554–566.
49.
KillenC. P., HuntR. A., & KleinschmidtE.J. (2008). Project portfolio management for product innovation.International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25(1), 24–38.
50.
KockA., HeisingW., & GemündenH.G. (2014). How ideation portfolio management influences project portfolio success.Journal of Product Innovation Management. In press.
51.
KorhonenT., LaineT., & MartinsuoM. (2014). Management control of project portfolio uncertainty: A managerial role perspective.Project Management Journal, 45(1), 21–37.
52.
LimB. (1995). Examining the organization culture and organizational performance link.Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 16, 16–21.
53.
LochC. H., & KavadiasS. (2002). Dynamic portfolio selection of NPD programs using marginal returns.Management Science, 48(10), 1227–1241.
54.
MakriM., LaneP. J., Gomez-Mejia, & LuisR. (2006). CEO incentives, innovation, and performance in technology-intensive firms: A reconciliation of outcome and behavior-based incentive schemes.Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1057–1080.
55.
MaltzA.C., ShenharA.J., DvirD., & GaoH. (2014). Success comes in many dimensions: The critical role of human capital and preparing for the future in every organization scorecard.British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 4(10), 1555–1576.
56.
MarkhamS. K., & GriffinA. (1998). The breakfast of champions: Associations between champions and product development environments, practices and performance.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(5), 436–454.
57.
MarkowitzH. (1952). Portfolio selection.The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
58.
MarkowitzH.M. (2010). Portfolio theory: As I still see it.Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2(1), 1–23.
59.
MartinsuoM. (2013). Project portfolio management in practice and in context.International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 794–803.
60.
MartinsuoM., & KillenC.P. (2014). Value management in project portfolios: Identifying and assessing strategic value.Project Management Journal.45(5), 56–70.
61.
MartinsuoM., & LehtonenP. (2009). Project autonomy in complex service development networks.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2(2), 261–281.
62.
McClellandG. H., & JuddC.M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects.Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376–390.
63.
MeskendahlS. (2010). The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success: A conceptual framework.International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 807–817.
64.
MeyerW.G. (2014). The effect of optimism bias on the decision to terminate failing projects.Project Management Journal, 45(4), 7–20.
65.
MikkolaJ.H. (2001). Portfolio management of R&D projects: Implications for innovation management.Technovation, 21(7), 423–435.
66.
MidlerC. (2013). Implementing a low-end disruption strategy through multi-project lineage management: The Logan case.Project Management Journal, 44(5), 24–35.
MorganR. E., & StrongC.A. (1998). Market orientation and dimensions of strategic orientation.European Journal of Marketing, 32(11/12), 1051–1073.
69.
MorganR. E., & StrongC.A. (2003). Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation.Journal of Business Research, 56(3), 163–176.
70.
MuellerK., SpiessS., HattrupK., & Lin-HiN. (2012). The effects of corporate social responsibility on employees' affective commitment: A cross-cultural investigation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1186–1200.
71.
MüllerR., MartinsuoM., & BlomquistT. (2008). Project portfolio control and portfolio management performance in different contexts.Project Management Journal, 39(3), 28–42.
72.
O'ReillyB. (1997). The secrets of America's most admired corporations: New ideas–new products.Fortune, 135(4), 60–64.
73.
ParboteeahK. P., AddaeH. M., & CullenJ.B. (2012). Propensity to support sustainability initiatives: A cross-national model.Journal of Business Ethics, 105(3), 403–413.
74.
PetitY. (2012). Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Organizing for uncertainty.International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 539–553.
75.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., LeeJ.-Y., & PodsakoffN.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
76.
PrabhuJ. C., ChandyR. K., & EllisM.E. (2005). The impact of acquisitions on innovation: Poison pill, placebo, or tonic?Journal of Marketing, 69, 114–130.
77.
RankJ., PaceV. L., & FreseM. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative.Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4), 518–528.
78.
RauchA., WiklundJ., LumpkinG. T., & FreseM. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practices, 33(3), 761–787.
SchwartzS.H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work.Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 23–47.
81.
SethiR., & IqbalZ. (2008). Stage-gate controls, learning failure, and adverse effect on novel new products.Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 118–134.
82.
ShalleyC., ZhouJ., & OldhamG.R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.
83.
ShaneS., VenkatramanS., & MacMillanI.C. (1995). Cultural differences in innovation championing strategies.Journal of Management, 21(5), 931–952.
84.
SpectorP. E., & BrannickM.T. (2011). Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables.Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 287–305.
85.
SpectorP. E., CooperC. L., & SparksK. (2001). An international study of the psychometric properties of the Hofstede values survey module 1994: A comparison of individual and country/province level results.Applied Psychology, 50(2), 269–281.
86.
SpectorP. E., ZapfD., ChenP., & FreseM. (2000). Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath tub.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 79–95.
87.
SzaboE., BrodbeckF. C., Den HartogD. N., ReberG., WeiblerJ., & WundererR. (2002). The Germanic Europe cluster: Where employees have a voice.Journal of World Business, 37, 55–68.
88.
TalkeK. (2007). Corporate mindset of innovating firms: Influences on new product performance.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1-2), 76–91.
89.
TellerJ. (2013). Portfolio risk management and its contribution to project portfolio success: An investigation of organization, process, and culture.Project Management Journal, 44(2), 36–51.
90.
TellerJ., & KockA. (2013). An empirical investigation on how portfolio risk management influences project portfolio success.International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 817–829.
91.
TellerJ., KockA., & GemündenH.G. (2014). Risk management in project portfolios is more than managing project risks: A contingency perspective on risk management.Project Management Journal, 45(4), 67–80.
92.
TellerJ., UngerB. N., KockA., & GemündenH.G. (2012). Formalization of project portfolio management: The moderating role of project portfolio complexity.International Journal of Project Management, (30), 569–607.
93.
TellisG. J., PrabhuJ. C., & ChandyR.K. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture.Journal of Marketing, 73, 3–23.
TurnerJ.R. (2010). Evolution of project management research as evidenced by papers published in the International Journal of Project Management.International Journal of Project Management, 28(1), 1–7.
96.
TurnerR., LedwithA., & KellyJ. (2010). Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: Matching processes to the nature of the firm.International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 744–755.
97.
UngerB. N., KockA., GemündenH. G., & JonasD. (2012). Enforcing strategic fit of project portfolios by project termination: An empirical study on senior management involvement.International Journal of Project Management, 30(6), 675–685.
98.
ValenciaJ.C.N., ValleR. S., & JiménezD.J. (2010). Organizational culture as determinant of product innovation.European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 466–480.
99.
van de VijverF.J.R., & LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research.New York, NY: Sage Publications, Ltd.
100.
VenkatramanN. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement.Management Science, 35(8), 942–962.
101.
VossM., & KockA. (2013). Impact of relationship value on project portfolio success: Investigating the moderating effects of portfolio characteristics and external turbulence.International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 847–861.
102.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource based view of the firm.Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
103.
ZengerT. R., & LazzariniS. (2004). Compensating for innovation: Do small firms offer high-powered incentives that lure talent and motivate effort?Managerial & Decision Economics, 25(6-7), 329–345.
