This paper focuses on the link between individuals' knowledge sourcing and their creative contributions, such as new ideas and solutions in R&D-driven product-development projects; creative contributions were both self- and peer-assessed. The paper reveals that, for individuals, knowledge sources internal to the organization were generally regarded as more important than external knowledge sources. However, external parties such as customers, partners, and suppliers constitute the knowledge source that best predicted creative contributions at the project level. Informal external contacts were deemed the least important knowledge source by individuals; however, this was positively related to self-assessed creative contributions. The paper thus finds that there is a discrepancy between the knowledge sources deemed important by individuals and the sources that are associated with creative contributions at the project level.
AgrawalA., CockburnI., & McHaleJ. (2006). Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships.Journal of Economic Geography, 6(5), 571–591.
2.
AgrawalA., & HendersonR. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT.Management Science, 48(1), 44–60.
3.
AjmalM. M., & KoskinenK.U. (2008). Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: An organizational culture perspective.Project Management Journal, 39(1), 7–15.
4.
AllenJ., JamesA. D., & GamlenP. (2007). Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R&D: A case study using social network analysis.R&D Management, 37(3), 179–196.
5.
AmabileT. M., ContiR., CoonH., LazenbyJ., & HerronM. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity.Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.
6.
AndersonC. J., GlassmanM., McAfeeR. B., & PinelliT. (2001). An investigation of factors affecting how engineers and scientists seek information.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(2), 131–155.
7.
AudretschD. B., FornahlD., & ZellnerC. (Eds.). (2005). The role of labour mobility and informal networks for knowledge transfer.Boston, MA: Springer.
8.
BramwellA., NellesJ., & WolfeD.A. (2008). Knowledge, innovation and institutions: Global and local dimensions of the ICT cluster in Waterloo, Canada.Regional Studies, 42(1), 101–116.
9.
BurtR.S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas.The American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.
10.
CarterA.P. (1989). Knowhow trading as economic exchange.Research Policy, 18(3), 155–163.
11.
ClausenT.H. (2013). External knowledge sourcing from innovation cooperation and the role of absorptive capacity: Empirical evidence from Norway and Sweden.Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(1), 57–70.
12.
CohenW. M., & LevinthalD.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
13.
DahlM. S., & PedersenC. Ø. R. (2004). Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: Myth or reality?Research Policy, 33(10), 1673–1686.
14.
DietrichP., EskerodP., DalcherD., & SandhawaliaB. (2010). The dynamics of collaboration in multipartner projects.Project Management Journal, 41(4), 59–78.
15.
EnsignP. C., & HébertL. (2009). Competing explanations for knowledge exchange: Technology sharing within the globally dispersed R&D of the multinational enterprise.Journal of High Technology Management Research, 20(1), 75–85.
16.
EnsignP. C., & HébertL. (2010). How reputation affects knowledge sharing among colleagues.MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(2), 78–81.
17.
GasikS. (2011). A model of project knowledge management.Project Management Journal, 42(3), 23–44.
18.
GemündenH. G., HeydebreckP., & HerdenR. (1992). Technological interweavement: A means of achieving innovation success.R&D Management, 22(4), 359–376.
19.
HåkansonL. (2010). The firm as an epistemic community: The knowledge-based view revisited.Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1801–1828.
20.
HoeglM., WeinkaufK., & GemuendenH.G. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study.Organization Science, 15(1), 38–55.
21.
IbrahimS. E., FallahM. H., & ReillyR.R. (2009). Localized sources of knowledge and the effect of knowledge spillovers: An empirical study of inventors in the telecommunications industry.Journal of Economic Geography, 9(3), 405–431.
22.
JepsenL.B. (2013). Complex new product development projects: How the project manager's information sharing with core actors changes over time.Project Management Journal, 44(6), 20–35.
23.
LaneP. J., KokaB. R., & PathakS. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct.Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833–863.
24.
LindqvistG., MalmbergA., & SölvellÖ (2002). Svenska klusterkartor En statistisk inventering av kluster i Sverige 2002 [In Swedish: Swedish cluster maps a statistical assessment of clusters in Sweden 2002].Centre for Research on Innovation and Industrial Dynamics.Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala Universitet.
25.
MonetaG. B., AmabileT. M., SchatzelE. A., & KramerS.J. (2010). Multirater assessment of creative contributions to team projects in organizations.European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(2), 150–176.
26.
MoodyssonJ., CoenenL., & AsheimB. (2008). Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: Analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon Valley life-science cluster.Environment and Planning A, 40(5), 1040–1056.
27.
NelsonA.J. (2009). Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion.Research Policy, 38(6), 994–1005.
28.
NonakaI., & ToyamaR. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process.Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2–10.
29.
OakeyR. (2007). Clustering and the R&D management of high-technology small firms: In theory and practice.R&D Management, 37(3), 237–248.
30.
PaananenM. (2009). Exploring the relationships between knowledge sources in the innovation process: Evidence from Finnish innovators.Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(6), 711–725.
31.
PenningsJ. M., & WezelF.C. (2007). Human capital, inter-firm mobility and organizational evolution.Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
32.
PolanyiM. (1966). The logic of tacit inference.Philosophy, 41(155), 1–18.
33.
RatchevaV. (2009). Integrating diverse knowledge through boundary spanning processes: The case of multidis-ciplinary project teams.International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 206–215.
34.
RobertsE.B. (2007). Managing invention and innovation.Research-Technology Management, 50(1), 35–54.
35.
RoperS., & ArvanitisS. (2012). From knowledge to added value: A comparative, panel-data analysis of the innovation value chain in Irish and Swiss manufacturing firms.Research Policy, 41(6), 1093–1106.
36.
SchraderS. (1991). Informal technology transfer between firms: Co-operation through information trading.Research Policy, 20(2), 153–170.
37.
TeiglandR., & WaskoM. (2009). Knowledge transfer in MNCs: Examining how intrinsic motivations and knowledge sourcing impact individual centrality and performance.Journal of International Management, 15(1), 15–31.
38.
TomlinsonP.R. (2010). Co-operative ties and innovation: some new evidence for UK manufacturing.Research Policy, 39(6), 762–775.
39.
VerspagenB. (1999). Large firms and knowledge flows in the Dutch R&D system: A case study of Philips Electronics.Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(2), 211–233.
40.
Von HippelE. (1987). Cooperation between rivals: Informal knowhow trading.Research Policy, 16(6), 291–302.
