This paper describes the quantitative analysis phase of an exploratory study to identify useful project management improvement initiatives and factors contributing to their successful embedment in organizations. A preliminary framework, based on a literature review and a series of interviews with practitioners, was tested via a questionnaire, which elicited 793 responses from project management practitioners worldwide. The paper focuses on factor analyses of the questionnaire responses, addressing issues of construct validity and reliability. The resulting final framework highlights 15 key project management improvement initiatives and 26 embedding factors grouped by the factor analyses into three project management improvement initiative themes and six embedding themes.
AnantatmulaV. (2008). The role of technology in the project manager performance model.Project Management Journal, 39(1), 34–48.
3.
AndersenE., & VaagaasarA. (2009). Project management improvement efforts: Creating project management value by uniqueness or mainstream thinking?Project Management Journal, 40(1), 19–27.
4.
ArgoteL., McEvilyB., & ReagansR. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes.Management Science, Special issue 49, 571–582.
5.
AtkinsonR., CrawfordL., & WardS. (2006). Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management.International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 687–698.
6.
BarberE. (2004). Benchmarking the management of projects: A review of current thinking.International Journal of Project Management, 22(4), 301–307.
7.
BesnerC., & HobbsB. (2013). Contextualized project management practice: A cluster analysis of practices and best practices.Project Management Journal, 44(1), 17–34.
8.
BollenK. (1989). Structural equation with latent variables.New York, NY: Wiley.
9.
BresnenM., & MarshallN. (2001). Understanding the diffusion and application of new management ideas in construction.Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 8(5/6), 335–345.
10.
BurnesB., CooperC., & WestP. (2003). Organisational learning: The new management paradigm?Management Decision, 41(5), 452–465.
11.
BurnesB. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal.Journal of Management Studies (UK), 41(6), 977–1003.
12.
BurrV. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism.London, England: Routledge.
13.
BurrV. (2003). Social constructionism (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
CarayonP. (2010). Human factors in patient safety as an innovation.Applied Ergonomics, 41(5), 657–665.
15.
ChanF., & ThongJ. (2009). Acceptance of agile methodologies: A critical review and conceptual framework.Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 803–814.
16.
ChapmanC., & WardS. (2011). How to manage project opportunity and risk: Why uncertainty management can be a much better approach than risk management.United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
17.
Cooke-DaviesT.J. (2001). Towards improved project management practice: Uncovering the evidence for effective practices through empirical research.Leeds Metropolitan University: Thesis for Doctor Philosophy.
18.
Cooke-DaviesT. J., CrawfordL., & LechlerT. (2009). Project management systems: Moving project management from an operational to a strategic discipline.Project Management Journal, 40(1), 110–123.
19.
CranefieldJ., & YoongP. (2009). Embedding personal professional knowledge in a complex online community environment.Online Information Review, 33(2), 257–275.
20.
CrawfordL., & PollackJ. (2004). Hard and soft projects: A framework for analysis.International Journal of Project Management, 22(8), 645–653.
21.
CrawfordL., TurnerJ., & HobbsB. (2006). Aligning capability with strategy: Categorizing projects to do the right projects and to do them right.Project Management Journal, 37(2), 38–51.
22.
DaiC., & WellsW. (2004). An exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performance.International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 523–532.
23.
EbertC., & ManJ. (2008). Effectively utilizing project, product and process knowledge.Information and Software Technology, 50(6), 579–594.
24.
EnglundR., & BuceroA. (2006). Project sponsorship: Achieving management commitment for project success.San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
25.
EskerodP., & RiisE. (2009). Project management models as value creators.Project Management Journal, 40(1), 4–18.
26.
FernandesG., WardS., & AraújoM. (2013a). Identifying useful project management practices: A mixed methodology approach.International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 1(4), 5–21.
27.
FernandesG., WardS., & AraújoM. (2013b). Developing a framework to improve and embed project management practices in organisations.Procedia Technology, 9, 846–856.
28.
FieldA. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
29.
GeraldiJ., RodneyT., MaylorH., SöderholmA., HobdayM., & BradyT. (2008). Innovation in project management: Voices of researchers.International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 586–589.
30.
GreenS.E. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion.Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653–669.
31.
GreenhalghT., RobertG., MacfarlaneF., BateP., & KyriakidouO. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations.Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.
32.
HobbsB., AubryM., & ThuillierD. (2008). The project management office as an organizational innovation.International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 547–555.
33.
JackE., & RaturiA. (2006). Lessons learned from methodological triangulation in management research.Management Research News, 29(6), 345–357.
34.
JohnstonD., & LintonJ. (2000). Social networks and the implementation of environmental technology.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(4), 465–477.
35.
KerznerH. (2009). Project management case studies (3rd ed). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
36.
KimJ., & MuellerC. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
37.
KlineP. (2002). An easy guide to factor analysis.London, England: Routledge.
38.
LangleyA., SmallmanC., TsoukasH., & Van De VenA. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow.Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13.
39.
LooR. (2002). Working towards best practices in project management: A Canadian study.International Journal of Project Management, 20(2), 93–98.
40.
LuuV., KimS., & HuynhT. (2008). Improving project management performance of large contractors using benchmarking approach.International Journal of Project Management, 26(7), 758–769.
41.
Malach-PinesA., DvirD., & SadehA. (2009). Project manager-project (PMP) fit and project success.International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(3), 268–291.
42.
MartinsuoM., HensmanN., ArttoK., KujaloJ., & JaafariA. (2006). Project-based management as an organizational innovation: Drivers, changes, and benefits of adopting project-based management.Project Management Journal, 37(3), 87–97.
43.
MaylorH., BradyT., Cooke-DaviesT., & HodgsonD. (2006). From projectification to programmification.International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 663–674.
44.
MeskendahlS. (2010). The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success: A conceptual framework.International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 807–817.
45.
MeyersP., SivakumarK., & NakataC. (1999). Implementation of industrial process innovations: Factors, effects, and marketing implications.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(3), 295–311.
46.
MilosevicD., & PatanakulP. (2005). Standardized project management may increase development projects success.International Journal of Project Management, 23(3), 181–192.
47.
MirF., & PinningtonA. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: Linking project management performance and project success.International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202–217.
48.
MorrisM., & VenkateshV. (2000). Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a changing work force.Personnel Psychology, 53(2), 375–403.
49.
NHS Modernisation Agency. (2003). Spread and sustainability of service improvement: Factors identified by staff leading modernisation programmes. Research into practice report No. 4: Overview of early research findings.London, England: Department of Health.
50.
NunnallyJ. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
51.
NystromP., RamamurthyK., & WilsonA. (2002), Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: Adoption of imaging technology, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19(3-4), 221–247.
52.
PellegrinelliS., & GaragnaL. (2009). Towards a conceptualisation of PMOs as agents and subjects of change and renewal.International Journal of Project Management, 27(7), 649–656.
53.
Project Management Institute. (2013). Organizational project management maturity model. (OPM3®) – Third edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.
54.
QureshiT., WarraichA., & HijaziS. (2009). Significance of project management performance assessment (PMPA) model.International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 378–388.
RogersE. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
57.
SenseA. (2007). Structuring the project environment for learning.International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 405–412.
58.
SharmaS., & RaiA. (2003). An assessment of the relationship between ISD leadership characteristics and IS innovation adoption in organizations.Information & Management, 40(5), 391–401.
59.
ShiQ. (2011). Rethinking the implementation of project management: A value adding path map approach.International Journal of Project Management, 29(3), 295–302.
SrivannaboonS., & MilosevicD. (2006). A theoretical framework for aligning project management with business.Project Management Journal, 37(3), 98–110.
63.
SzulanskiG. (1996). Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm.Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.
64.
SzulanskiG. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9–27.
65.
ThomasJ., & MullalyM. (2007). Understanding the value of project management: First steps on an international investigation in search of value.Project Management Journal, 38(3), 74–89.
66.
ThomasJ., & MullalyM. (2008). Researching the value of project management.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
67.
VenkateshV. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model.Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.
68.
VenkateshV., & BalaH. (2008). Technology acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions.Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
69.
VenkateshV., MorrisM., SykesT., & AckermanP. (2004). Individual reactions to new technologies in the workplace: The role of gender as a psychological construct.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(3), 445–467.
70.
WardS. (2004). Risk management organization and context.London, England: Witherbys Publishing.
71.
WinterM., & SzczepanekT. (2008). Projects and programmes as value creation processes: A new perspective and some practical implications.International Journal of Project Management, 26(1), 95–103.
72.
ZhaiL., XinY., & ChengC. (2009). Understanding the value of project management from a stakeholder's perspective: Case study of mega-project management.Project Management Journal, 40(1), 99–109.
