Although a traditional project model is clearly useful for laying out the patterns of relationships surrounding a project, it does not provide the temporally embedded accounts that enable us to understand how organizational learning takes place. The process thinking perspective offers a means to solving this problem. This article provides an analysis of how different processes interact dynamically in order to benefit project-based companies' organizational learning. Two findings from this study are: (1) organizational learning is a dynamic concept that emphasizes the continually changing nature of a project-based company and (2) sensemaking and negotiation of meaning are ongoing processes in project-based companies.
BakkenT., & HernesT. (2002a). Introduction: Niklas Luhmann's autopoietic theory and organization studies—A space of connections. In BakkenT., & HernesT. (Eds.), Autopoietic organization theory (pp. 9–22). Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt.
2.
BakkenT., & HernesT. (2002b). The macro-micro problem in organization theory: Luhmann's autopoiesis as a way of handling recursivity. In BakkenT., & HernesT. (Eds.), Autopoietic organization theory (pp. 53–74). Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt.
3.
BergerP. L., & LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
4.
BergsonH. (1999). An introduction to metaphysics.Cambridge, MA: Hackett.
5.
BromileyP., & PapenhausenC. (2003). Assumptions of rationality and equilibrium in strategy research: The limits of traditional economic analysis. Strategic Organization, 1(4), 413–437.
6.
BrownA. D. (2000). Making sense of inquiry sensemaking. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 45–76.
7.
CapraF. (1996). A new understanding of living systems: The web of life.New York, NY: Anchor.
8.
ChiaR. (1999). A “rhizomic” model of organizational change and transformation: Perspective from a metaphysics of change. British Journal of Management, 10(3), 209–227.
9.
ChiaR., & LangleyA. (2004). The first organization studies summer workshop: Theorizing process in organizational research (call for papers). Organization Studies, 25(8), 1486.
10.
ClarkeL. (1999). Mission probable: Using fantasy documents to tame disaster.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
CyertR. M., & MarchJ. G. (1992). A behavioral theory of the firm.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
12.
CzarniawskaB. (2004). On time, space, and action nets. Organization, 11(6), 773–791.
13.
DawsonP. (1994). Organizational change: A processual approach.London, UK: Paul Chapman.
14.
DodgsonM. (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies, 14(3), 375–394.
15.
EmirbayerM., & MischeA. (1998). What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 104(4), 962–1023.
16.
FarmerR. L. (1997). Beyond the impasse: The promise of a process hermeneutic.Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.
17.
FeldmanM. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.
18.
GephartR. P. (2007a). Hearing discourse. In ZachryM., & ThrallsC. (Eds.), The cultural turn: Perspectives on communication practices in workplaces and the professions (pp. 239–260). Amityville, NY: Baywood Press.
19.
GephartR. P. (2007b). Crisis sense-making and public inquiry. In PearconC., Roux-DufortC., & ClairJ. (Eds.), International handbook of organizational crisis management (pp. 123–160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
GephartR. P., TopalC., & ZhangZ. (2010). Future-oriented sensemaking: Temporalities and institutional legitimation. In HernesT., & MaitlisS. (Eds.), Process, sensemaking, and organizing (pp. 275–302). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society.Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
22.
GioiaD. A., & ChittipeddiK. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433–448.
23.
GioiaD. A., ThomasJ. B., ClarkS. M., & ChittipeddiK. (1994). Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science, 5(3), 363–383.
24.
HernesT. (2008). Understanding organization as process: Theory for a tangled world.London, UK: Routledge.
25.
HernesT. (2010). Actor-network theory: Callon's scallops, and process-based organization studies. In HernesT., & MaitlisS. (Eds.), Process, sensemaking, and organizing (pp. 161–184). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
HernesT., & MaitlisS. (2010). Process, sensemaking, and organizing: An introduction. In HernesT., & MaitlisS. (Eds.), Process, sensemaking, and organizing (pp. 27–37). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
HofstadterD. R. (1979). Goedel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid.New York, NY: Basic Books.
28.
KoskinenK. U. (2003). Evaluation of tacit knowledge utilisation in work units. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(5), 67–81.
29.
KoskinenK. U. (2010a). Recursive view of the project-based companies' knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(2), 258–268.
30.
KoskinenK. U. (2010b). Autopoietic knowledge systems in project-based companies.Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
KoskinenK. U., & PihlantoP. (2008). Knowledge management in project-based companies: An organic perspective.Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
LangleyA. (2007). Process thinking is strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 271–282.
33.
LangleyA., & TsoukasH. (2010). Introducing “perspectives on process organization studies.” In HernesT., & MaitlisS. (Eds.), Process, sensemaking, and organizing (pp. 1–26). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
LevittB., & MarchJ. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.
35.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science.New York, NY: Harper & Row.
36.
LoveP. E. D., FongP. S. W., & IraniZ. (2005). Management of knowledge in project environments.Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
37.
LuhmannN. (1995). Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik 4: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft [Structure of society and semantic 4: Studies on knowledge-sociology of modern society]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
38.
MaitlisS. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.
39.
MerriamS., & CaffarellaR. (1991). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
MeyerA. D., GabaV., & ColwellK. (2005). Organizing far from equilibrium: Nonlinear change in organizational forms. Organization Science, 16(5), 456–473.
41.
PeirceC. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286–302.
42.
PepperS. (1942). World hypotheses.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43.
PettigrewA. M. (1992). The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal, 13(winter special issue), 5–16.
44.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (1987). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide). Newtown Square, PA: Author.
45.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (1996). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide). Newtown Square, PA: Author.
46.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide; 4th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author.
47.
RafaeliS. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In HawkinsR. P., WeimannJ. M., & PingreeS. (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110–134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
RafaeliS., & SudweeksF. (1998). Interactivity on the nets. In RafaeliS. (Ed.), Network & netplay (pp. 173–189). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
RaivolaR., & RopoE. (1991). Jatkuva koulutus ja elinikäinen oppiminen [Continuous training and life long learning]. Tampere, Finland: TAY Julkaisusarja A: Tutkimusraportti, 9.
50.
RamsdenP. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education.London, UK: Routledge.
51.
RescherN. (1996). Process metaphysics.New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
52.
RogersA. (2003). What is the difference? A new critique of adult learning and teaching.Leicester, UK: NIACE.
53.
Sahlin-AnderssonK., & SöderholmA. (2002). The Scandinavian school of project studies. In Sahlin-AnderssonK., & SöderholmA. (Eds.), Beyond project management: New perspectives on the temporary-permanent dilemma (pp. 11–24). Malmö, Sweden: Liber.
54.
SäljöR. (1979). Learning in the learner's perspective. I. Some common-sense conceptions. In Reports from the Institute of Education (No. 76). Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
55.
ScarbroughH., SwanJ., LaurentS., BresnenM., EdelmanL., & NewellS. (2004). Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1579–1600.
56.
SeidlD. (2005). Organizational identity and self-transformation: An autopoietic perspective.Hants, UK: Ashgate.
57.
StarbuckW. H., & MillikenF. J. (1998). Challenger: Fine-tuning the odds until something breaks. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 319–340.
58.
Stromer-GalleyJ. (2004). Interactivity-as-product and interactivity-as-process. The Information Society, 20(5), 391–394.
59.
TsoukasH. (1994). Refining common sense: Types of knowledge in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 31(6), 761–780.
60.
TsoukasH. (2005). Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemology.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
TsoukasH., & HatchM. J. (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations, 54(8), 979–1013.
63.
Van de VenA. H. (1992). Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13(summer special issue), 169–188.
64.
von KroghG., IchijoK., & NonakaI. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
65.
WeickK. (1979). The social psychology of organizing.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
66.
WeickK. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.
WeickK., SutcliffeK. M., & ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
68.
WengerE. (2001). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
WhiteheadA. N. (1978). Process and reality.New York, NY: The Free Press.
