Teamwork during integrated design projects is complex. We address this by investigating how trust, collaboration, and conflict evolve over time to affect performance. Our results stem from data gathered using validated self-report questionnaires with 38 participants in 5 multidisciplinary teams at three points in time during a 6-week integrated design competition. Results show that without collaboration, trust and conflict have no bearing on performance. In addition to an unambiguous practical outcome—fostering collaboration helps build trust and manage conflict—our study points to theoretical developments: as trust- and conflict-performance relations grow over time, so does collaboration's mediating effect.
AlperS., TjosvoldD., & LawK. S. (2000). Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in organizational teams. Personnel Psychology, 53, 625–642.
2.
ArditiD., & GünaydinH. M. (1998). Factors that affect process quality in the life cycle of building projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124, 194–203.
3.
BedwellW. L., WildmanJ. L., DiazGranadosD., LazzaraE. H., ShufflerM. L., & XavierL. (2009). What is collaboration? A multidisciplinary review. Presented at the 4th Annual Conference of the Interdisciplinary Network for Group Research, Colorado Springs, CO.
4.
BettenhausenK. L. (1991). Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345–381.
5.
BlacklerF., CrumpN., & McDonaldS. (1999). Managing experts and competing through innovation: An activity theoretical analysis. Organization, 6, 5–31.
6.
BonitoJ. E., WittenbaumG. M., & HirokawaR. Y. (2009). Small group communication. In StacksD. W., & SalwenM. B. (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 348–369). New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
BouldingK. (1963). Conflict and defense: A general theory.New York: Harper & Brothers.
8.
BrownJ. S., & DuguidP. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12, 198–213.
9.
BrundtlandG. (1987). Our common future: The World Commission on Environment and Development.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
ChiocchioF. (2007). Project team performance: A study of electronic task and coordination communication. Project Management Journal, 38, 97–109.
11.
ChiocchioF. (2009a). Is the PMBOK® up to speed with HR issues? YES! (if you are a 1960's project manager). Presented at the OVOC 9th Annual Symposium, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
12.
ChiocchioF. (2009b). Critical processes in project teams. Unpublished manuscript, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
13.
ChiocchioF., GrenierS., O'NeillT., SavariaK., & WillmsD. J. (in press). The effects of collaboration on performance: A multilevel validation in project teams. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management.
14.
ChowdhuryS., EndresM., & LanisT.W. (2002). Preparing students for success in team work environments: The importance of building confidence. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14, 346–359.
15.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
CostaA. C. (2003). Work team trust and team effectiveness. Personnel Review, 32, 605–622.
17.
D'AmourD., Ferrada-VidelaM., San Martin RodriguezL., & BeaulieuM.-D. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 116–131.
18.
De DreuC. K. W., & WeingartL. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.
19.
De DreuC. K. W., WeingartL. R., & KwonS. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889–905.
20.
DeutschM. (2003). Cooperation and conflict: A personal perspective on the history of the social psychological study of conflict resolution. In WestM. A., TjosvoldD., & SmithK. G. (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 9–43). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
21.
DruskatV.U., & KayesD. C. (2000). Learning versus performance in short-term project teams. Small Group Research, 31, 328–353.
22.
DunnD. S., McCarthyM. A., BakerS., HalonenJ. S., & HillG. W.IV (2007). Quality benchmarks in undergraduate psychology programs. American Psychologist, 62, 650–670.
23.
DupagneA. (1991). Computer integrated building: Strategic final report (CE Commission DGXIII: ESPRIT II Exploratory Action no. 5604).
24.
EganJ. (1998). Rethinking construction: The report of the Construction Task Force.London: HMSO.
25.
EvansM. (2003). The evolution of cooperation. In WestM. A., TjosvoldD., & SmithK. G. (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 45–54). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
26.
GriffinM. A., NealA., & ParkerS. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327–347.
27.
GruentherK., BaileyR., WilsonJ., PluckerC., & HashmiH. (2009). The influence of prior industry experience and multidisciplinary teamwork on student design learning in a capstone design course. Design Studies, 30, 721–736.
28.
GullyS. M., IncalcaterraK. A., JoshiA., & BeaubienJ. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819–832.
29.
HackmanR. J. (1987). The design of work teams. In LorschJ. W. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
IlgenD. R., HollenbeckJ. R., JohnsonM., & JundtD. (2005). Teams in organizations: From Input-Process-Output models to IMOI models. Annual Reviews in Psychology, 56, 517–543.
31.
IliesR., & JudgeT. A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effect of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 453–467.
32.
JehnK. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.
33.
JehnK. A., & BenderskyC. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187–242.
34.
JehnK. A., BezrukovaK., & ThatcherS. (2008). Conflict, diversity, and fault-lines in workgroups. In De DreuC. K. W., & GelfandM. J. (Eds.), The psychology of conflict management in organizations (pp. 179–210). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
JehnK. A., & MannixE. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 238–251.
36.
KeelerM., & BurkeB. (2009). Fundamentals of integrated design for sustainable building.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
37.
KimM. J., & MaherM. L. (2008). The impact of tangible user interface on spatial cognition during collaborative design. Design Studies, 29, 222–253.
38.
KleinC., DiazGranadosD., SalasE., LeH., BurkeC. S., LyonsR., & GoodwinG. F. (2009). Does Team Building Work?Small Group Research, 40, 181–222.
39.
KoskelaL., HowellG., & LichtigW. (2006, November–December). Contracts and production. Symposium on Sustainability and Value through Construction Procurement, Salford, UK (pp. 332–339).
40.
KozlowskiS. J., & BellB. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In BormanW. C., IlgenD. R., KlimoskiR. J., & WeinerI. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). London, UK: Wiley.
41.
KozlowskiS. W. J., GullyS. M., NasonE. R., & SmithE. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In PulakosE. D., & IlgenD. R. (Eds.), The changing nature of performance (pp. 240–292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42.
KozlowskiS. W. J., & KleinK. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In KleinK. K., & KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43.
KrygielE., & NiesB. (2008). Green BIM: Successful sustainable design with building information modeling.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
44.
LarssonN. (2002). The integrated design process: Report on a national workshop.Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada.
45.
LathamS. M. (1994). Constructing the team. Final report of the government/industry review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the UK construction industry.London, UK: HMSO.
46.
LawsonB. (2005). How designers think: The design process demystified.Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
47.
LepineJ. A., PiccoloR. F., JacksonC. L., MathieuJ. E., & SaulJ. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273–307.
48.
MarksM. A., MathieuJ. E., & ZaccaroS. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.
49.
Martinez-MoyanoI.J. (2006). Exploring the dynamics of collaboration in interorganizational settings. In SchumanS. (Ed.), Creating a culture of collaboration (pp. 69–85). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
50.
McGrathJ. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147–174.
51.
MendlerS., OdellW., & LazarusM. A. (2006). The HOK guidebook to sustainable design (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
52.
MillwardL. J., BanksA., & RigaK. (2010). Effective self-regulating teams: A generative psychosocial approach. Team Performance Management, 16, 50–73.
53.
NewstetterW., & McCrackenW. M. (2001). Novice conceptions of design: Implications for the design of learning environments. In EastmanC., McCrackenM., & NewstetterW. (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education (pp. 63–77). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
54.
OlekalnsM., PutnamL. L., WeingartL. R., & MetcalfL. (2008). Communication processes and conflict management. In De DreuC. K. W., & GelfandM. J. (Eds.), The psychology of conflict management in organizations (pp. 81–114). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
PektasS. T., & PultarM. (2006). Modelling detailed information flows in building design with the parameter-based design structure matrix. Design Studies, 27, 99–122.
56.
PondyL. R. (1967). Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 296–320.
57.
PreacherK. J., & HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
58.
Project Management Institute. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide;4th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author.
59.
ReedB., BoeckerJ., HorstS., KeiterT., LauA., ShefferM., & ToevsB. (2009). The integrative design guide to green building: Redefining the practice of sustainability.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
60.
RounceG. (1998). Quality, waste and cost considerations in architectural building design management. International Journal of Project Management, 16, 123–127.
61.
SimonsT. L., & PetersonR. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102–111.
62.
SPSS Inc. (2008). SPSS (Version 16) [SPSS for Windows]. Chicago, IL: Author.
63.
StewartG. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29–54.
64.
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
65.
TjosvoldD. (2008). Conflicts in the study of conflicts in organizations. In De DreuC. K. W., & GelfandM. J. (Eds.), The psychology of conflict management in organizations (pp. 445–453). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66.
TuckmanB. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399.
67.
TuckmanB. W., & JensenM. A. C. (1977). Stages in small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 5, 419–427.
68.
TylerT. R. (2003). Trust within organisations. Personnel Review, 32, 556–568.
69.
WilliamsH. M., & AllenN. J. (2008). Teams at work. In BarlingJ., & CooperC. L. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior: Vol. 1. Micro approaches (pp. 141–159). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
70.
YoungG. (2003). Contextualizing cooperation. In WestM. A., TjosvoldD., & SmithK. G. (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 77–109). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
71.
ZagerD. (2002). Collaboration as an activity coordinating with pseudo-collective objects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 181–204.
