Studies have found the development of transferable skills and the provision of virtual learning environments (VLEs) to be crucial to students who are learning project management. Taking these factors into consideration, this article explores why project management students have emphasized the importance of these two critical learning and teaching parameters in their developmental needs. The study was conducted utilizing focus groups consisting of 88 students in a UK higher education institution. Overall, we found the existence of five critical and applied themes grouped against transferable skills and the provision of VLEs under which students’ needs could be classified.
AlaviM., & GallupeR. (2003). Using information technology in learning: Case studies in business and management education programs. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 139–153.
2.
BerggrenC., & SoderlundC. (2008). Rethinking project management education: Social twists and knowledge co-production. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 286–296.
3.
BowmanD., HodgesL., AllisonD., & WinemanJ. (1999). The educational value of an information-rich virtual environment. Presence, 8(3), 317–331.
4.
BreenR. (2006). A practical guide to focus group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30, 463–475.
5.
BrownT., & JenkinsM. (2003). VLE surveys: A longitudinal perspective between March 2001 and March 2003 for Higher Education in the United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.ucisa.ac.uk/groups/tlig/vle/index_html
6.
CampbellM., GibsonW., HallA., RichardsD., & CalleryP. (2008). Online vs. face-to face discussion in a web-based research methods course for postgraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 750–759.
7.
ChipuluM., OjiakoU., AshleighM., & MaguireS. (2011). An analysis of interrelationships between project management and student-experience constructs. Project Management Journal, 42(3), 91–101. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20225
8.
Confederation of British Industry. (1989). Towards a Shills revolution—A youth charter. Interim report of the vocational task force.London: Author.
9.
Cooke-DaviesT., & LechlerT. (2009). Project management systems: Moving project management from an operational to a strategic discipline. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 110–123.
10.
CrawfordL., MorrisP., ThomasJ., & WinterM. (2006). Practitioner development: From trained technicians to reflective practitioners. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 722–733.
11.
CrebertG., BatesM., BellB., PatrickC., & CragnoliniV. (2004). Developing generic skills at university, during work placement and in employment: Graduates’ perceptions. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(2), 147–165.
12.
CryerP. (1998). Transferable skills, marketability and lifelong learning: The particular case of postgraduate research students. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 207–216.
13.
CunliffeA. L. (2002). Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 33(1), 35–61.
14.
DalcherD. (2009). Managing complex projects: A new model. Project Management Journal, 40(3), 83.
15.
de GraafE., & KolmosA. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657–662.
16.
DivjakB., & KukecS. (2008). Teaching methods for international R&D project management. International Journal of Project Management, 26(3), 251–257.
GeistD., & MyersM. (2007). Pedagogy and project management: Should you practice what you preach?Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 23, 202–208.
19.
HaggisT. (2006). Pedagogies for diversity: Retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down.’Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 521–535.
20.
HartmanF. (2008). Preparing the mind for dynamic management. International Journal of Project Management, 26(3), 258–267.
21.
HodgesD., & BurchellN. (2003). Business graduate competencies: Employers’ views on importance and performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 4(2), 16–22.
22.
JamiesonA., SabatesR., WoodleyA., & FeinsteinL. (2009). The benefits of higher education study for part-time students. Studies in Higher Education, 34(3), 245–262.
23.
JenkinsM., BrowneT., & WalkerR. (2005). VLE surveys: A longitudinal perspective between March 2001, March 2003 and March 2005 for higher education in the United Kingdom.Oxford, UK: UCISA.
KimJ. (2005). The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 7–19.
26.
KitzingerJ. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interactions between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 6, 103–121.
27.
KitzingerJ. (1995). Education and debate—Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299–302.
28.
KolltveitB., Terje KarlsenJ., & GronhaugK. (2007). Perspectives on project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 3–9.
29.
KruegerR. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research.London: Sage.
30.
LesterS., & CostleyC. (2010). Work-based learning at higher education level: Value, practice and critique. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 561–575.
31.
LeybourneS., & Sadler-SmithE. (2006). The role of intuition and improvisation in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24(6), 483–492.
32.
MertonR., FiskM., & KendallP. (1956). The focused interview: A report of the bureau of applied social research.New York: Columbia University.
33.
National Curriculum Council. (1990). The whole curriculum, curriculum guidance 3.London: NCC/SEAC.
34.
O'BrienK. (1993). Improving survey questionnaires through focus groups. In MorganD. (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 105–118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
OjiakoG. U., AshleighM., ChipuluM., & MaguireS. (2010). Learning and teaching challenges in project management. International Journal of Project Management. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.03.008
36.
PollackJ. (2007). The changing paradigms of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 266–274.
37.
PowellR., & SingleH. (1996). Methodology matters—V focus groups. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 18, 499–504.
38.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2000). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide).Newtown Square, PA: Author.
39.
RamsayD., BoardmanJ., & ColeA. (1996). Reinforcing learning, using soft systemic frameworks. International Journal of Project Management, 14(1), 31–36.
40.
SaynischM. (2010). Beyond frontiers of traditional project management: An approach to evolutionary, self-organizational principles and the complexity theory-Results of the research program. Project Management Journal, 41(2), 21–37.
41.
SenseA. (2007). Learning within project practice: Cognitive styles exposed. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 33–40.
42.
SmithK., JohnsonD., JohnsonR., & SheppardS. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–101.
43.
ThomasJ., & MengelM. (2008). Preparing project managers to deal with complexity-Advanced project management education. International Journal of Project Management, 26(3), 304–315.
44.
van RaaijE., & SchepersJ. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838–852.
45.
WearneS. (2008). Stakeholders in excellence in teaching and learning of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 26(3), 326–328.
46.
ZhangD., ZhaoJ., ZhouL., & NunamakerJ. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning?Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79.
