The requirement to prequalify prior to tendering for a project is often reported as burdensome. We need more ways to think constructively about this sort of project management problem. The pragmatists argue that constructive thinking includes encouraging stakeholders to shift from their default conception of a problematic situation. Ackoff (2006) suggested a way of doing this. He called it “problem dissolving.” This includes “zooming out” from the situation to conceive of the old problem situation as just one element in a metasystem. This article explains how and why problem dissolving might be used to reconceptualize prequalification. After explaining the approach, it tests the approach on industry experts. Projects are human activity systems, so it seemed reasonable to reflect on prequalification using the attributes of a project as a system: purpose, transformation, connectivity, and boundary. A reconceptualization of prequalification emerged where it was seen to have the potential to become a policy mechanism for improving the industry.
AbudayyehO., ZidanS., YehiaS., & RandolphD. (2007). Hybrid prequalification-based innovative contracting model using AHP. Journal of Management in Engineering23(2), 88–96.
2.
AckoffR. L. (1971). Towards a system of system concepts. Management Science, 17, 661–671.
3.
AckoffR. L. (2006). Idealized design.Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Business School Press.
4.
Al-HarbiK. M. Al-S. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1), 19–27.
5.
ArgyrisC., & SchönD. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
AyyubB. M. (2001). Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
7.
BasuS. (1999). Corporate purpose: Why it matters more than strategy.New York: Garland.
8.
Bergvall-KârebornB., MirijamdotterA., & BasdenA. (2004). Basic principles of SSM modeling: An examination of CATWOE from a soft perspective. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17(2), 55–73.
9.
BertalanffyL.V. (1976). General system theory.New York: George Braziller.
10.
ChecklandP. (2000). Soft systems methodology: A thirty year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 17(S1), S11–S58.
11.
ChengE.W. L., & LiH. (2004). Contractor selection using the analytic network process. Construction Management and Economics, 22, 1021–1032.
12.
ChurchmanC.W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies.New York: Basic Books.
13.
ClelandD. I., & KingW. R. (1968). Systems analysis and project management.New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
DeciE. L. (1992). On the nature and function of motivation theories. Psychological Science, 3, 167–171.
15.
DennettD. C. (1989). The intentional stance.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
DeweyJ. (1910). How we think.New York: Dover.
17.
FlickU. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
GraneheimU. H., & LundmanB. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.
19.
GubriumJ. F., & HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of interview research: Context and method.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
HaackS. (2006). Pragmatism: Old and new.New York: Prometheus Books.
21.
HeideggerM. (2008). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper Perennial Classics. (Original work published 1962)
22.
HoltG. D. (1998). Which contractor selection methodology?International Journal of Project Management, 16(3), 153–164.
23.
HoltG. D., OlomolaiyeP. O., & HarrisF. C. (1995). A review of contractor selection practice in the UK construction industry. Building and Environment, 30, 553–561.
24.
HookinsT., & MetcalfeM. (2005). A systematic development of the interrogative pronouns and adverbs. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18, 581–605.
25.
HowickS., & EdenC. (2010). Supporting strategic conversations. Journal of the Operational Research Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1057/jors.2010.103
26.
JamesW. (1907). Pragmatism.Cleveland, OH: World Publishing (Meridian).
27.
JohnsonS. B. (2006). The secret of Apollo: Systems management in American and European space programs.Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
28.
KadaneJ. B., & WolfsonL. J. (1998). Experiences in elicitation. The Statistician, 4(1), 3–19.
29.
LamK. C., HuT. S., & NgS. T. (2005). Using the principal component analysis method as a tool in contractor pre-qualification. Construction Management and Economics, 23, 673–684.
30.
LewisM. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Towards a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760–776.
31.
LindlofT. R., & TaylorB. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
ListonJ. (1994). Prequalification of contractors—Research report.Brisbane, Australia: Physical Infrastructure Centre, Queensland University of Technology.
33.
LiuL. Q., & YanW. (2005). Evaluation method based on artificial neural network in contractor prequalification of tenderers. Journal of Chongqing Jianzhu University, 27(4), 97–101.
34.
LuhmannN. (1995). Social systems.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
MenandL. (2001). The metaphysical club.London: Flamingo.
37.
MidgleyG. (2003). Science as systemic intervention: Some implications of systems thinking and complexity for the philosophy of science. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16(2), 77–97.
38.
MillsA. J. (2005, June). Client and contractor attitudes to prequalification. Paper presented at the American Association of Cost Engineers International Conference, New Orleans, LA.
MizruchiM. S. (1994). Social network analysis: Recent achievements and current controversies. Acta Sociologica, 37, 329–343.
41.
MorseJ. M. (1994). Critical issues in qualitative research methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
NeumanY. (2003). Processes and boundary of the mind.New York: Kluwer Academic.
43.
NgS. T. (2001). EQUAL: A case based contractor prequalifier. Automation in Construction, 10, 443–457.
44.
NgS. T., SkitmoreM. R., & SmithN. J. (1999). Decision-makers’ perceptions in the formulation of prequalification criteria. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 6(2), 155–165.
45.
PalaneeswaranE., & KumaraswamyM. M. (2005). Web-based client advisory decision support system for design-builder prequalification. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 19(1), 69–82.
46.
PalaneeswaranE., NgT., & KumaraswamyM. (2006). Client satisfaction and quality management systems in contractor organizations. Building and Environment, 41, 1557–1570.
RescherN. (1979). Cognitive systematization: A systems-theoretic approach to a coherentist theory of knowledge.Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
49.
RortyR. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
RosenheadJ., & MingersJ. (Eds.). (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict.Chichester, UK: Wiley.
51.
RussellJ. S., & SkibniewskiM. J. (1988). Decision criteria in contractor prequalification. Journal of Management in Engineering, 4(2), 148–164.
52.
SchonD. A. (1963). Displacement of concepts.London: Tavistock.
53.
SonmezM., HoltG. D., YangJ. B., & GrahamG. (2002). Applying evidential reasoning to prequalifying construction contractors. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(3), 111–119.
54.
SowellT. (1985). Marxism.London: Unwin.
55.
UlrichW. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy.Chichester, UK: Wiley.
56.
UlrichW. (2000). Some guidelines for boundary critique. Reflective Practice, 1, 247–268.
57.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
WinterM., SmithC., MorrisP., & CicmilS. (2006a). Directions for future research in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 638–649.
59.
WinterM., SmithC., MorrisP., & CicmilS. (2006b). The importance of ‘process’ in rethinking project management: The story of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 650–662.
60.
WongH. C. (2004). Contractor performance prediction model for the United Kingdom construction contractor: Study of logistic regression approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130, 691–698.
