This paper presents a study on the progress of project management. Descriptions of projects from 2000 and 2008 are studied. The study concludes that the field of project management is moving ahead. Project team members are more knowledgeable about project work, project objectives are more clearly expressed, project organization is more appropriate, most work processes are improved, and team members experience project work as rewarding and are more motivated for future projects. However, the project results are not fully satisfactory. It is shown that stakeholders’ satisfaction could be improved by better decision processes, better management and leadership, and closer cooperation with the stakeholders.
AndersenE. S., & SørsveenÅ. (2003). IT projects and the X model. In SundgrenB., MårtenssonP., MähringM., & NilssonK. (Eds.), Exploring patterns in information management (pp. 133–145). Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics.
6.
BrydeD. J. (2003). Modelling project management performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20, 229–254.
7.
BuusI. (2004). Leadership development: A Scandinavian model. Business Leadership Review, 1(3), 1–5.
8.
ContiT. A. (2007). A history and review of the European Quality Award Model. TQM, 19(2), 112–128.
9.
Cooke-DaviesT. (2002). The “real” success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20, 185–190.
10.
de WitA. (1988). Measurement of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 6, 164–170.
11.
EmeryF. E., & TristE. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–35.
12.
FlyvbjergB., BruzeliusN., & RothengatterW. (2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GustavsenB. (2007). Work organization and “the Scandinavian model.”Economic and Industrial Democracy, 28, 650–671.
14.
LangeforsB. (1966). Theoretical analysis of information systems.Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
15.
LePineJ. A., PiccoloR. F., JacksonC. L., MathieuJ. E., & SaulJ. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273–307.
16.
MillerR., & LessardD. R. (2001). The strategic management of large engineering projects.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
MorrisP. W. G. (1994). The management of projects.London: Thomas Telford.
18.
MorrisP. W. G. (forthcoming). A brief history of project management—Or of something similar but more than that. In MorrisP. W. G., PintoJ. K., & SöderlundJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
MumfordE., & WeirM. (1959). Computer systems in work design—The ETHICS method.London: Associated Business Press.
20.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2009, May). Survey shows clear trend toward better project performance. PMI Today, pp. 8–9.
SlevinD. P., & PintoJ. K. (1987). Balancing strategy and tactics in project implementation. Sloan Management Review, 29(1), 33–41.
23.
SöderlundJ., & TellF. (2009). The P-form organization and the dynamics of project competence: Project epochs in Asea/ABB, 1950-2000. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 101–112.
VernerJ. M., OvermyerS. P., & McCainK. W. (1999). In the 25 years since The Mythical Man-Month what have we learned about project management?Information and Software Technology, 41, 1021–1026.
26.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
WesterveldE. (2003). The Project Excellence Model®: Linking success criteria and critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 411–418.
28.
WinterM., AndersenE. S., ElvinR., & LeveneR. (2006). Focusing on business projects as an area for future research: An exploratory discussion of four different perspectives. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 699–709.
29.
WinterM., SmithC., MorrisP., & CicmilS. (2006). Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 638–649.
