The purpose of this article is to suggest a possible “meta” approach of the project management field—the unit of analysis—respectful of the various perspectives in existence, while providing an integrative ontological and epistemological framework. In order to do so, I first suggest what could be perceived as being the state of the field and its main constituting “school of thoughts.” Then I open the debate on what could be the ontological and epistemological perspectives enabling us to better take into account the diversity we face in considering the richness of the field. Based on these developments, I propose to address project management as a complex integrative knowledge field, which eventually will lead us to consider “modeling—developing specific convention—to do ingeniously” as acting and learning mode in the management of projects.
AnbariF. T. (1985). A systems approach to project evaluation. Project Management Journal, 16(3), 21–26.
2.
AnbariF. T., BredilletC. N., & TurnerJ. R. (2008). Perspectives on research in project management. In SolomonG. (Ed.), Best Papers Proceedings, Academy of Management 2008 Meeting [CD]. Academy of Management
3.
ArgyrisC., & SchönD. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
ArttoK. A., MartinsuoM., GemündenH. G., & MurtoaroJ. (2009). Foundations of program management: A bibliometric view. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 1–18.
5.
AshbyW. (1958). Requisite variety and implications for control of complex systems. Cybernetica, 1, 83–99.
6.
Association for Project Management. (2006). APM body of knowledge (5th ed.). High Wycombe, UK: Association for Project Management.
7.
AtkinsonR. (2006). Guest editorial: Excellence in teaching and learning for project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 185–186.
8.
AudetM. (1986). Le procès des connaissances de l'administration. In AudetM., & MalouinJ. L. (Eds.), La production des connaissances de l'administration [The indictment of knowledge in public administration] (pp. 23–56). Québec: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
9.
BoisotM. H. (1998). Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy.New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
BoutinetJ.-P. (1996). Anthropologie du Projet [Anthropology of project]. Paris: PUF.
11.
BoutinetJ.-P. (1997). Tensions et paradoxes dans le management de projet [Tensions and paradoxes in project management]. Les cahiers de l'actif, pp. 266–267.
12.
BredilletC. N. (2002). Genesis and role of standards: Theoretical foundations and socio-economical model for the construction and use of standards. Proceedings of IRNOP V, Renesse, Zeeland, The Netherlands.
13.
BredilletC. N. (2004a). Theories and research in project management: Critical review and return to the future. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Lille School of Management (ESC Lille), France.
14.
BredilletC. N. (2004b). Beyond the positivist mirror: Towards a project management ‘gnosis.’Proceedings of IRNOP VI, Turku, Finland.
15.
BredilletC. N. (2007a). From the editor: Exploring research in project management: Nine schools of project management research (part 1). Project Management Journal, 38(2), 2–4.
16.
BredilletC. N. (2007b). From the editor: Exploring research in project management: Nine schools of project management research (part 2). Project Management Journal, 38(3), 3–5.
17.
BredilletC. N. (2007c). From the editor: Exploring research in project management: Nine schools of project management research (part 3). Project Management Journal, 38(4), 2–4.
18.
BredilletC. N. (2008a). From the editor: Exploring research in project management: Nine schools of project management research (part 4). Project Management Journal, 39(1), 2–6.
19.
BredilletC. N. (2008b). From the editor: Exploring research in project management: Nine schools of project management research (part 5). Project Management Journal, 39(2), 2–4.
20.
BredilletC. N. (2008c). From the editor: Exploring research in project management: Nine schools of project management research (part 6). Project Management Journal, 39(3), 2–5.
21.
BrooksF. P. (1995). The mythical man-month (20th anniversary ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22.
CicmilS., WilliamsT., ThomasJ., & HodgsonD. (2006). Rethinking project management: Researching the actuality of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 675–686.
Cooke-DaviesT., CicmilS., CrawfordL., & RichardsonK. (2007). We're not in Kansas anymore Toto: Mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Project Management Journal, 8(2), 50–61.
25.
CrawfordL. H. (2007). Developing individual competence. In TurnerJ. R. (Ed.), The Gower handbook of project management (4th ed., pp. 677–694). Aldershot, UK: Gower.
26.
CrawfordL. H., HobbsJ. B., & TurnerJ. R. (2005). Project categorization systems: Aligning capability with strategy for better results.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
27.
CrawfordL. H., HobbsJ. B., & TurnerJ. R. (2006). Aligning capability with strategy: Categorizing projects to do the right projects and do them right. Project Management Journal, 37(2), 38–50.
28.
CrozierM., & FriedbergE. (1980). Actors and systems.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
DeclerckR. P., DebourseJ.-P., & DeclerckJ. C. (1997). Le management stratégique: Contrôle de l'irréversibilité [Strategic management: The control of irreversibility]. Lille, France: Les éditions ESC Lille.
30.
DeclerckR. P., DebourseJ.-P., & NavarreC. (1983). La méthode de direction générale: Le management stratégique [Method for general management: The strategic management]. Paris: Hommes et Techniques.
31.
EspinasA. (1890, July-December). Les origines de la technologie. Revue Philosophique, XVth Year, XXX, pp. 114–115.
GareisR., & HuemannM. (2007). Maturity models for the project oriented company. In TurnerJ. R. (Ed.), The Gower handbook of project management (4th ed., pp. 183–208). Aldershot, UK: Gower.
34.
GentnerD. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170.
35.
GersickC. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10–36.
36.
GiardV., & MidlerC. (1993). Pilotages de projet et entreprises: Diversités et convergences [Conducting projects and enterprises: Diversities and convergences] Paris: Economica.
37.
GiddensA. (1986). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38.
GomezP. Y. (1994). Qualité et Théorie des Conventions [Quality and theory of convention]. Paris: Economica.
39.
GomezP. Y., & JonesB. C. (2000). Conventions: An interpretation of deep structure in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 696–708.
40.
GuenonR. (1986). Initiation et réalisation spirituelle [Initiation and spiritual fulfillment]. Paris: Editions Traditionnelles.
41.
HjørlandB. (1998). The classification of psychology: A case study in the classification of a knowledge field. Knowledge Organization, 25(4), 162–201.
42.
HodgsonD., & CicmilS. (2006). Making projects critical.Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
43.
HoudeJ. (2007). Analogically situated experiences: Creating insight through novel contexts. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6, 321–331.
44.
International Project Management Association. (2006). International competency baseline (3rd ed.). Zurich, Switzerland: Author.
45.
KuhnT. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
KurtzC. F., & SnowdenD. J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42, 462–483.
47.
KwakY. H., & AnbariF. T. (2008). Impact on project management of allied disciplines: Trends and future of project management practices and research.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
48.
Le MoigneJ.-L. (1995). Les épistémologies constructivistes [Constructivist epistemologies]. Paris: PUF.
49.
Le MoigneJ.-L. (2003). Le constructivisme—Tome 3 modéliser pour comprendre [Constructivism: Volume 3 modeling to understand]. Paris: Ed L'Harmattan, Coll. Ingenium.
50.
LeroyD. (1994, December). Fondements et impact du management par projets [Foundation and impact of the management of projects]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, IAE de Lille—USTL.
51.
Levi-StraussC. (1971). The elementary structures of kinship.Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
LewisD. K. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
LeybourneS. A. (2007). The changing bias of project management research: A consideration of the literatures and an application of extant theory. Project Management Journal, 38(1), 61–73.
MaylorH. (Guest Ed.). (2006). Rethinking project management. International Journal of Project Management [Special Issue], 24(8).
57.
MengerC. (1985). Investigations into the method of the social sciences with special reference to economics. (SchneiderL., Ed.; F. J. Nock, Trans.) New York: New York University Press.
58.
MeredithJ. R. (2002). Developing project management theory for managerial application: The view of a research journal's editor. Proceedings of PMI Research Conference 2002: Frontiers of Project Management Research and Application [CD], Seattle, WA. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
59.
MintzbergH. (1990). Strategy formation: Schools of thought. In FredericksonJ. W. (Ed.), Perspectives on strategic management (pp. 105–209). Boston, MA: Ballinger.
60.
MorrisP. W. G. (1997). The management of projects.London: Thomas Telford.
61.
MorrisP. W. G., & JamiesonH. A. (2004). Translating corporate strategy into project strategy: Achieving corporate strategy through project management.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
62.
NorthS. M. (1987). The making of knowledge in composition: Portrait of an emerging field.Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
63.
OrleanA. (1989). Pour une approche cognitive des conventions economiques. Léconomie des conventions: Revue Economique, 40(2), 241–272.
64.
Oxford English Dictionary. (2009). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
65.
PolanyiM. (1958). Personal knowledge.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
66.
Project Management Institute. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)—Fourth edition.Newtown Square, PA: Author.
67.
RichardsonK. A. (2005). To be or not to be? That is (not) the question: Complexity theory and the need for critical thinking. In RichardsonK. (Ed.), Managing organizational complexity: Philosophy, theory, and application (pp. 21–46). Greenwich, CT: IAP
68.
SauerC., & ReichB. H. (2007). Guest editorial: What do we want from a theory of project management? A response to Rodney Turner. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 1–2.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1989). Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
71.
SearleJ. R. (1997). The mystery of consciousness.New York: Granta.
72.
SengeP. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.New York: Doubleday.
73.
SengeP. M. (1994). Building learning organizations. In De WitB., & MeyerR. (Eds.), Strategy: Process, content, context (pp. 132–141). Minneapolis, MN: West Publishing.
74.
ShenharA. J., & DvirD. (1996). Toward a typological theory of project management. Research Policy, 25, 607–632.
SöderlundJ. (2002). On the development of project management research: Schools of thought and critique. Project Perspectives, 8, 20–31.
77.
SöderlundJ. (2004). Building theories of project management: Past research, questions for the future. International Journal of Project Management, 22(3), 183–191.
78.
SugdenR. (1989). Spontaneous order. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 85–97.
79.
TurnerJ. R. (1993). The handbook of project-based management.London: McGraw-Hill.
80.
TurnerJ. R. (2006a). Editorial: Towards a theory of project management: The nature of the project. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 1–3.
81.
TurnerJ. R. (2006b). Editorial: Towards a theory of project management: The nature of project governance and project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 93–95.
82.
TurnerJ. R. (2006c). Editorial: Towards a theory of project management: The functions of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 187–189.
83.
TurnerJ. R. (2006d). Editorial: Towards a theory of project management: The nature of the functions of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 277–279.
84.
TurnerJ. R. (2009). The handbook of project based management (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
85.
TurnerJ. R., & MullerR. (2006). Choosing appropriate project managers: Matching their leadership style to the type of project.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
86.
UmplebyS., & AnbariF. T. (2004). Strengthening the global university system and enhancing projects management education. Review of Business Research, 4, 237–243.
87.
VicoG. B. (1708). La Méthode des études de notre temps [The method of studies in our time]. Presentation and traduction par PONS Alain, 1981 (texte de 1708). Paris: Grasset.
88.
Von MisesL. (1976). Epistemological problems of economics.New York: New York University Press.
89.
Von MisesL. (1981). Praxeology. The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty, 31, 515–576.
90.
WalkerD. H. T., CicmilS., ThomasJ., AnbariF. T., & BredilletC. (2008). Collaborative academic/practitioner research in project management: Theory and models. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(1), 17–32.
WinterM., SmithC., MorrisP. W. G., & CicmilS. (2006). Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government funded research network. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 638–649.
93.
World Bank. (2009). World development indicators CD-ROM.Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
