BauinS. (1986). Aquaculture: A field by bureaucratic fiat. In CallonM., LawJ., & RipA. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 124–141). London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
2.
BauinS., MicheletB., SchweighofferM. G., & VermeulinP. (1991). Using bibliometrics in strategic analysis: “Understanding chemical reactions” at the CNRS. Scientometrics, 22, 113–137.
3.
CallonM. (1986). Pinpointing industrial invention: An exploration of quantitative methods for the analysis of patents. In CallonM., LawJ., & RipA. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 163–188). London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
4.
CallonM., CourtialJ.-P., & LavilleF. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22, 155–205.
5.
CallonM., CourtialJ.-P., & TurneW. (1986). Future developments. In CallonM., LawJ., & RipA. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 211–217). London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
6.
CallonM., LawJ., & RipA. (1986). How to study the force of science. In CallonM., LawJ., & RipA. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 3–15). London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
7.
CoulterN., MonarchI., & KondaS. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1206–1223.
8.
CourtialJ.-P. (1998). Comments on Leydesdorff's article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(1), 98.
9.
CourtialJ.-P., CallonM., & SigogneauA. (1993). The use of patent titles for identifying the topics of invention and forecasting trends. Scientometrics, 26, 231–242.
10.
CourtialJ.-P., & LawJ. (1989). A co-word study of artificial intelligence. Social Studies of Science (London), 19, 301–311.
11.
GarfieldE., MalinM., & SmallH. (1978). Citation data as science indicators. In ElkanaY., LederbergJ., MertonR. K., ThackrayA., & ZuckermanH. (Eds.), Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators (Ch. 8, pp. 179–207). New York: Wiley.
KostoffR. N., EberhartH. J., ToothmanD. R., & PellenbargR. (1997). Database Tomography for technical intelligence: Comparative roadmaps of the research impact assessment literature and the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Scientiometrics, 40, 103–138.
14.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
LatourB. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
LawJ., BauinS., CourtialJ.-P., & WhittakerJ. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics, 14, 251–264.
17.
LawJ., & WhittakerJ. (1992). Mapping acidification research: A test of the co-word method. Scientometrics, 23, 417–461.
18.
LeydesdorffL. (1997). Why words and co-words cannot map the development of the science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 418–427.
19.
LeydesdorffL. (1998). Reply about using co-words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 98–99.
20.
MacKenzieD. (1978). Statistical theory and social interests: A case study. Social Studies of Science, 8, 35–83.
21.
NederhofA. J., & van WijkE. (1997). Mapping the social and behavioral sciences worldwide: Use of maps in portfolio analysis of national research efforts. Scientometrics, 40, 237–276.
22.
PolanyiM. (1958). Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
PopperK. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery (translation of Logik der Forschung).London: Hutchinson.
24.
RottoE., & MorganR. P. (1997). An exploration of expert-based text analysis techniques for assessing industrial relevance in U.S. engineering dissertation abstracts. Scientometrics, 40, 83–102.
25.
TurnerW. A., & CallonM. (1986). State intervention in academic and industrial research: The case of macro-molecular chemistry in France. In CallonM., LawJ., & RipA. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 142–162). London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
26.
TurnerW. A., ChartronG., LavilleE., & MicheletB. (1988). Packaging information for peer review: New co-word analysis techniques. In Van RaanA. F. J. (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (pp. 291–323). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
27.
TurnerW. A., & RojouanF. (1991). Evaluating input/output relationships in a regional research network using co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 22, 139–154.
28.
WeingartP. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?Scientometrics, 62, 117–131.
29.
WhittakerJ. (1989). Creativity and conformity in science: Titles, keywords and co-word analysis. Social Studies of Science, 19, 473–496.