In this article, we examine the effect of social network position, structure, and ties on the performance of knowledge-intensive workers in dispersed occupational communities. Using structural holes and strength-of-tie theory, we develop a theoretical framework and a valid and reliable survey instrument. Second, we apply network and structural holes measures for understanding its association with performance. Empirical results suggest that degree centrality in a knowledge workers’ professional network positively influences performance use, whereas a highly constrained professional network is detrimental to performance. The findings show that social network structure and position are important factors to consider for individual performance.
AhujaM. K., GallettaD. F., & CarleyK. M. (2003). Individual centrality and performance in R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Science, 49(1), 21–38.
2.
AjzenI., & FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
AnconaD. G., & CaldwellD. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321–341.
4.
AralS., BrynjolfssonE., & AlstyneM. V. (2006, December 10–13). Information, technology and information worker productivity: Task level evidence. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
5.
AriesE. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences.New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BavelasA. (1950). Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 22, 725–730.
7.
BernardH. R., KillworthP. D., KronenfeldD., & SailerL. (1985). On the validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 495–517.
8.
BonacichP. (1991). Simultaneous group and individual centralities. Social Networks, 13(2), 155–168.
BorgattiS. P., JonesC., & EverettM. (1998). Network measures of social capital. Connections, 21(2), 27–36.
11.
BormanW. C., & MotowidloS. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In SchmittN. & BormanW. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
12.
BrassD. J. (1981). Structural relationships, job characteristics and worker satisfaction and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 331–348.
13.
BrassD. J. (1985). Technology and the structuring of jobs: Employee satisfaction, performance and influence. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Making, 35, 216–240.
14.
BrecklerS. J., GreenwaldA. G., & PratkanisA. R. (1989). Attitude structure and function.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
BrookR. H., McGlynnE. A., & ShekelleP. G. (2000). Defining and measuring quality of care: A perspective from US researchers. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 12, 281–285.
16.
BurgessR. L. (1968). Communication networks and behavioral consequences. Human Relations, 22, 137–159.
17.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition.Boston: Harvard University Press.
18.
BurtR. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349–399.
19.
BurtR. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital.New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
BurtR. S. (2007). Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 119–148.
21.
BurtR. S., HogarthR. M., & MichaudC. (2000). The social capital of French and American managers. Organization Science, 11(2), 123–147.
22.
CampbellS. M., RolandM. O., & BuetowS. A. (2000). Defining quality of care. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 1611–1625.
23.
CatellR. B. (1966). The screen test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
24.
ChoudhryN. K., FletcherR. H., & SoumeraiS. B. (2005). Systematic review: The relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 142, 260–283.
25.
ChungK. S. K. (2008). Understanding attitudes towards performance in knowledge-intensive work: the influence of social networks and ICT use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
26.
ChungK. S. K., HossainL., & DavisJ. (2005, October 20–21). Social networks and ICT correlates to individual performance. Paper presented at the Applications of Social Network Analysis 2005, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
27.
CockburnJ., KillerD., CampbellE., & Sanson-FisherR. W. (1987). Measuring general practitioners’ attitudes towards medical care. Family Practice, 4(3), 192–199.
28.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
29.
ColemanJ. S., KatzE., & MenzelH. (1957). The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry, 20, 253–270.
30.
CrossR., & CummingsJ. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 928–937.
31.
CrowstonK., SawyerS., & WigandR. (2001). Investigating the interplay between structure and information and communications technology in the real estate industry. Information Technology & People, 14(2), 163–183.
32.
CummingsJ. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50, 352–364.
33.
CummingsJ. N., & CrossR. (2003). Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25(3), 197–210.
34.
DindiaK., & AllenM. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta analysis. Psychology Bulletin, 112, 106–124.
35.
DvirD., SadehA., & Malach-PinesA. (2006). Project and project managers: The relationship between project managers’ personality, project types, and project success. Project Management Journal, 37(5), 36–48.
36.
DykstraP. A. (1990). Disentangling direct and indirect gender effects on the supportive network. In KeesC. P., KnipscheerM., & AntonucciT. C. (Eds.), Social network research (pp. 55–65). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
37.
EaglyA. H., & JohnsonB. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A metaanalysis. Psychology Bulletin, 108, 233–256.
38.
FarajS., & SproullL. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46, 1554–1568.
39.
FaustK. (1997). Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks, 19(2), 157–191.
40.
FazioR. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior. In SorrentinoR. M. & HigginsE. T. (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 204–243). New York: Guilford Press.
41.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1974). Attitudes toward objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81, 59–74.
42.
FreemanL. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.
43.
FreemanL. C., RoederD., & MulhollandR. R. (1979). Centrality in social networks: ii. Experimental results. Social Networks, 2, 119–141.
44.
FreemanL. C., RomneyA. K., & FreemanS. C. (1987). Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 89, 311–325.
45.
GabbayS. M., & LeendersR. T. A. J. (2001). Social capital of organizations.Amsterdam and London: JAI.
46.
GoodhueD. L., & ThompsonR. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19, 213–236.
47.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
48.
GranovetterM. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.
49.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
50.
GrinterR. E., HerbslebJ. D., & PerryD. E. (1999). The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work. Paper presented at the Group 99 Conference, Phoenix, Arizona.
51.
GuetzkowH., & DillW. R. (1957). Factors in the organizational development of task oriented groups. Sociometry, 20, 175–204.
52.
GuetzkowH., & SimonH. (1955). The impact of certain communication nets upon organization and performance in task-oriented groups. Management Science, 1(3/4), 233–250.
53.
GurevitchM. (1961). The social structure of acquaintanceship networks.Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
54.
HairJ. F. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55.
HallJ. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
56.
HammerM. (1984). Explorations into the meaning of social network interview data. Social Networks, 6, 341–371.
HansenM. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.
59.
HossainL., WuA., & ChungK. S. K. (2006). Actor centrality correlates to project based coordination. Paper presented at the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
60.
HumphreysJ. S., & RolleyF. (1998). A modified framework for rural general practice: The importance of recruitment and retention. Social Science Medicine, 46, 939–949.
61.
IgbariaM., & TanM. (1997). The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance. Information & Management, 32(3), 113–121.
62.
KieslerC. A. (1971). The psychology of commitment: Experiments linking behaviour to belief.New York: Academic Press.
63.
KnokeS., & KulinskiJ. H. (1992). Network analysis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64.
KrackhardtD. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In NohriaN. & EcclesR. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structures, form and action (pp. 216–239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
65.
LeavittH. (1949). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance.Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
66.
LeavittH. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38–50.
67.
LevinD. Z., & CrossR. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 1477–1494.
68.
MarsdenP., & CampbellK. E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63, 482–501.
69.
MehraA., KilduffM., & BrassD. (2001). The social networks of high and low-self monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 121–146.
70.
MellowM. (2005). The work of rural professionals: Doing the Gemeinschaft-Gesellschaft Gavotte. Journal of Rural Sociology, 70(1), 50–69.
71.
MongeP., RothmanL., EisenbergE., MillerK., & KirsteK. (1985). The dynamics of organizational proximity. Management Science, 31, 1129–1141.
72.
MullenB., JohnsonC., & SalasE. (1991). Effects of communication network structure: Components of positional centrality. Social Networks, 13(2), 169–185.
OhH., ChungM.-H., & LabiancaG. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 860–875.
75.
PetersonT. M. (2007). Motivation: How to increase project team performance. Project Management Journal, 38(4), 60–69.
76.
PfefferJ. (1980). A partial test of the social information processing model of job attitudes. Human Relations, 33, 457–476.
77.
PodolnyJ., & BaronJ. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673–693.
78.
ReagansR., & McEvilyB. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240–267.
79.
ReagansR., & ZuckermanE. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12, 502–517.
80.
RosenthalE. (1997). Social networks and team performance. Team Performance Management, 3, 288–294.
81.
RoterD. L., HallJ. A., & AokiY. (2002). Physician gender effects in medical communication: A meta-analytic review. JAMA, 288, 756–764.
82.
Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP). (2004). Rural general practice—Definition. Retrieved November 14, 2004, from http://www.racgp.org.au/document.asp?id=15301
83.
SalancikG. R., & PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.
84.
ScottJ. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook.London: SAGE.
85.
SparroweR. T., LidenR. C., WayneS. J., & KraimerM. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316–326.
86.
TeachmanJ. D. (1980). Analysis of population diversity: Measures of qualitative variation. Sociological Methods Research, 8, 341–362.
87.
ThamhainH. J. (2004). Team leadership effectiveness in technology-based project environments. Project Management Journal, 36(1), 49–61.
88.
TurnerJ. R., & MüllerR. (2005). The project manager's leadership styles as a success factor on projects: A literature review. Project Management Journal, 36(1), 49–61.
89.
VerbruggeL. M., & SteinerR. P. (1981). Physician treatment of men and women patients: Sex bias or appropriate care?Medical Care, 19, 609–632.
90.
WeismanC. S., & TeitelbaumM. A. (1989). Women and health care communication. Patient Education and Counseling, 13, 183–199.
91.
WickerA. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relation of verbal and overt behavioral reponses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41–78.
