Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Individuals like their name letters more than non–name letters. This effect has been termed the Name Letter Effect (NLE) and is widely exploited to measure implicit (i.e. automatic, unconscious) self–esteem, predominantly by means of the Initial Preference Task (IPT). Methodological research on how to best administer the IPT is, however, scarce. In order to bridge this gap, the present paper assessed the advantages and disadvantages of different types of IPT administrations with two meta–analyses (k = 49; N = 11,514) and a follow–up experiment (N = 449). As a result, a new type of administration is recommended which (1) treats the effects of the first and the last name initials separately, (2) uses a duplicate administration for reliability reasons, (3) uses the likability as well as the attractiveness item wording and (4) exploits not only letters but also numbers (i.e. birthday number effect) to measure implicit self–esteem. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

birthday number effect implicit self-esteem initial preference task meta-analysis name letter effect scoring algorithm

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta–analyses.

Albers

, Dijksterhuis

, & Rotteveel

(2009). Towards optimizing the name letter test as a measure of implicit self–esteem. Self and Identity, 8, 63–77.

Baccus

J. R.

, Baldwin

M. W.

, & Packer

D. J.

(2004). Increasing implicit self–esteem through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 15, 498–502.

Back

M. D.

, Krause

, Hirschmüller

, Stopfer

J. M.

, Egloff

, & Schmukle

S. C.

(2009). Unraveling the three faces of self–esteem: A new information–processing sociometer perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 933–937.

Bluemke

, & Friese

(2008). Reliability and validity of the single–target IAT (ST–IAT): Assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 977–997.

Borenstein

, Hedges

L. V.

, Higgins

J. P. T.

, & Rothstein

H. R.

(2009). Introduction to meta–analysis. Chichester, UK:Wiley.

*Bosson

J. K.

, Swann

W. B.

, & Pennebaker

J. W.

(2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self–esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631–643.

*Bosson

J. K.

, Brown

R. P.

, Zeigler–Hill

, & Swann

W. B.

(2003). Self–enhancement tendencies among people with high explicit self–esteem: The moderating role of implicit self–esteem. Self and Identity, 2, 169–187.

Campbell

D. T.

, & Stanley

J. C.

(1966). Experimental and quasi–experimental design for research. Chicago:Rand McNally.

10.

Castelli

, Carraro

, Gawronski

, & Gava

(2010). On the determinants of implicit evaluations: When the present weighs more than the past. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 186–191.

11.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, (2nd edn). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

12.

De Houwer

, Teige–Mocigemba

, Spruyt

, & Moors

(2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368.

13.

*De Raedt

, Schacht

, Franck

, & De Houwer

(2006). Self–esteem and depression revisited: Implicit positive self–esteem in depressed patients? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1017–1028.

14.

DeHart

(2002). The hidden effects of early experiences: The origins and stability of implicit self–esteem. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The State University of New York at Buffalo.

15.

DeHart

, Pelham

B. W.

, & Murray

(2004). Implicit dependency regulation: Self–esteem, relationship closeness, and implicit evaluations of close others. Social Cognition, 22, 126–146.

16.

*DeHart

, Pelham

B. W.

, & Tennen

(2006). What lies beneath: Parenting style and implicit self–esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 1–17.

17.

*Dijksterhuis

(2004). I like myself but I don't know why: Enhancing implicit self–esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 345–355.

18.

Epstein

, & Morling

(1995). Is the self motivated to do more than enhance and/or verify itself? In Kernis

M. H.

(Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self–esteem (pp. 9–29). New York:Plenum.

19.

Formann

A. K.

(2008). Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta–analysis due to publication bias. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 29, 732–739.

20.

Gailliot

M. T.

, & Schmeichel

B. J.

(2006). Is implicit self–esteem really unconscious? Implicit self–esteem eludes conscious reflection. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 3, 73–83.

21.

*Gawronski

, Bodenhausen

G. V.

, & Becker

A. P.

(2007). I like it, because I like myself: Associative self–anchoring and post–decisional change of implicit evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 221–232.

22.

Gawronski

, LeBel

E. P.

, Peters

K. R.

, & Banse

(2009). Methodological issues in the validation of implicit measures: Comment on De Houwer, Teige–Mocigemba, Spruyt, and Moors. (2009). Psychological Bulletin, 135, 369–372.

23.

*Gebauer

J. E.

, Riketta

, Broemer

, & Maio

G. R.

(2008). How much do you like your name? An implicit measure of global self–esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1346–1354.

24.

Greenwald

A. G.

, & Banaji

M. R.

(1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self–esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.

25.

Greenwald

A. G.

, McGhee

D. E.

, & Schwartz

J. L. K.

(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

26.

Greenwald

A. G.

, Banaji

M. R.

, Rudman

L. A.

, Farnham

S. D.

, Nosek

B. A.

, & Mellott

D. S.

(2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self–esteem, and self–concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25.

27.

Gregg

A. P.

, & Sedikides

(2010). Narcissistic fragility: Rethinking its links to explicit and implicit self–esteem. Self and Identity, 9, 142–161.

28.

Guardo

C. J.

, & Bohan

J. B.

(1971). Development of a sense of self–identity in children. Child Development, 42, 1909–1921.

29.

Hall

G. S.

(1898). Some aspects of the early sense of self. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 351–395.

30.

Hetts

J. J.

, & Pelham

B. W.

(2009). Stereotypes of the stereotyped: The implicit and explicit self–evaluations of members of stigmatized groups. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.

31.

Hetts

J. J.

, Sakuma

, & Pelham

B. W.

(1999). Two roads to positive regard: Implicit and explicit self–evaluation and culture. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 512–559.

32.

Hofmann

, Gawronski

, Gschwendner

, Le

, & Schmitt

(2005). A meta–analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self–report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385.

33.

Hoorens

, Nuttin

J. M.

, Erdélyi–Herman

I. E.

, & Pavakanun

(1990). Mastery pleasure versus mere ownership: A quasi–experimental cross–cultural and cross–alphabetical test of the name letter effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 181–205.

34.

*Jones

J. T.

, Pelham

B. W.

, Mirenberg

M. C.

, & Hetts

J. J.

(2002). Name letter preferences are not merely mere exposure: Implicit egotism as self–regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 170–177.

35.

Jones

J. T.

, Pelham

B. W.

, Carvallo

, & Mirenberg

M. C.

(2004). How do I love thee? Let me count the Js: Implicit egotism and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 665–683.

36.

Jordan

C. H.

, Spencer

S. J.

, & Zanna

M. P.

(2003). ‘I love me … I love me not’: Implicit self–esteem, explicit self–esteem, and defensiveness. In Spencer

S. J.

, Fein

, Zanna

M. P.

, & Olson

J. M.

(Eds.), The Ontario symposium: Vol. 9. Motivated social perception (pp. 117–145). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.

37.

Jordan

C. H.

, Spencer

S. J.

, Zanna

M. P.

, Hoshino–Browne

, & Correll

(2003). Secure and defensive high self–esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 969–978.

38.

Kernis

M. H.

(2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self–esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1–26.

39.

*Kernis

M. H.

, Lakey

C. E.

, & Heppner

W. L.

(2008). Secure versus fragile high self–esteem as a predictor of verbal defensiveness: Converging findings across three different markers. Journal of Personality, 76, 477–512.

40.

*Kitayama

, & Karasawa

(1997). Implicit self–esteem in Japan: Name letters and birthday numbers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 736–742.

41.

Kobayashi

, & Greenwald

A. G.

(2003). Implicit–explicit differences in self–enhancement for Americans and Japanese. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 34, 522–541.

42.

Koole

S. L.

, & DeHart

(2007). Self–affection without self–reflection: Origins, mechanisms, and consequences of implicit self–esteem. In Sedikides

, & Spencer

(Eds.), The self in social psychology (pp. 36–86). New York:Psychology Press.

43.

*Koole

S. L.

, Smeets

, van Knippenberg

, & Dijksterhuis

(1999). The cessation of rumination through self–affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 111–125.

44.

Koole

S. L.

, Dijksterhuis

, & van Knippenberg

(2001). What's in a name: Implicit self–esteem and the automatic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 669–685.

45.

*Krizan

(2008). What is implicit about implicit self–esteem? Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1635–1640.

46.

Krizan

, & Suls

(2008). Are implicit and explicit measures of self–esteem related? A meta–analysis for the Name–Letter Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 521–531.

47.

*Krizan

, & Suls

(2009). Implicit self–esteem in the context of trait models of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 659–663.

48.

*LeBel

E. P.

(2010). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of implicit and explicit self–esteem correspondence. Self and Identity, 9, 195–208.

49.

*LeBel

E. P.

, & Gawronski

(2009). How to find what's in a name: Scrutinizing the optimality of five scoring algorithms for the name–letter task. European Journal of Personality, 23, 85–106.

50.

Mierke

, & Klauer

(2003). Method–specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180–1192.

51.

Nuttin

J. M.

(1985). Narcissism beyond Gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 353–361.

52.

Nuttin

J. M.

(1987). Affective consequences of mere ownership: The name–letter effect in twelve European languages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 381–402.

53.

Payne

B. K.

, Burkley

M. A.

, & Stokes

M. B.

(2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude test diverge? The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 16–31.

54.

Pelham

B. W.

, & Hetts

J. J.

(1999). Implicit and explicit personal and social identity: Toward a more complete understanding of the social self. In Tyler

T. R.

, Kramer

R. M.

, & John

O. P.

(Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 115–144). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.

55.

Pelham

B. W.

, Mirenberg

M. C.

, & Jones

J. T.

(2002). Why Susie sells seashells by the seashore: Implicit egotism and major life decisions. Attitudes and Social Cognition, 82, 469–487.

56.

Pelham

B. W.

, Koole

S. L.

, Hardin

C. D.

, Hetts

J. J.

, Seah

, & DeHart

(2005). Gender moderates the relation between implicit and explicit self–esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 84–89.

57.

*Pöhlmann

, & Hannover

(2006). Who shapes the self of independents and interdependents? Explicit and implicit measures of the self's relatedness to family, friends and partner. European Journal of Personality, 20, 525–547.

58.

*Prewitt–Freilino

J. L.

, & Bosson

J. K.

(2008). Defending the self against identity misclassification. Self and Identity, 7, 168–183.

59.

*Riketta

(2005). Gender and socially desirable responding as moderators of the correlation between implicit and explicit self–esteem. Current Research in Social Psychology, 11, 14–28.

60.

Rosenberg

(1965). Society and the adolescent self–image. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.

61.

*Rudolph

, Schröder–Abé

, Schütz

, Gregg

A. P.

, & Sedikides

(2008). Through a glass, less darkly? Reassessing convergent and discriminant validity in measures of implicit self–esteem. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 273–281.

62.

Sakellaropoulo

, & Baldwin

M. W.

(2007). The hidden sides of self–esteem: Two dimensions of implicit self–esteem and their relation to narcissistic reactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 995–1001.

63.

Schimmack

, & Diener

(2003). Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self–esteem for subjective well–being. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 100–106.

64.

Schmeichel

B. J.

, Gailliot

M. T.

, Filardo

E. A.

, McGregor

, Gitter

, & Baumeister

R. F.

(2009). Terror management theory and self–esteem revisited: The roles of implicit and explicit self–esteem in mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1077–1087.

65.

Schröder–Abé

, Rudolph

, & Schütz

(2007). High implicit self–esteem is not necessarily advantageous: Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self–esteem and their relationship with anger expression and psychological health. European Journal of Personality, 21, 319–339.

66.

*Schröder–Abé

, Rudolph

, Wiesner

, & Schütz

(2007). Self–esteem discrepancies and defensive reactions to social feedback. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 174–183.

67.

*Stieger

(2010a). The development of a self–esteem AMP. Unpublished raw data.

68.

*Stieger

(2010b). Self assessed attractiveness and implicit self–esteem. Unpublished raw data.

69.

*Stieger

(2010c). Name letter branding under scrutiny: Real products, new algorithms, and the probability of buying. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110, 1089–1097.

70.

Stieger

, & Burger

(2010). Implicit and explicit self–esteem in the context of Internet addiction. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 681–688.

71.

Stieger

, & LeBel

E. P.

(in press). Name–letter preferences for new last name and abandoned birth name initials in the context of name–change via marriage. Social Psychology.

72.

Stieger

, Formann

A. K.

, & Burger

(2011). Humor styles and their relationship to explicit and implicit self–esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 747–750.

73.

Strack

, & Deutsch

(2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.

74.

Syz

H. C.

(1926). Observations on the unreliability of subjective reports of emotional reactions. British Journal of Psychology, 17, 119–126.

75.

Verplanken

, Friborg

, Wang

C. E.

, Trafimow

, & Woolf

(2007). Mental habits: Metacognitive reflection on negative self–thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 526–541.

76.

Viechtbauer

(2010). Conducting meta–analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48.

77.

von Collani

, & Herzberg

P. Y.

(2003). Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwertgefühl von Rosenberg (A revision of the Rosenberg Self–Esteem Scale in German language). Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 3–7.

78.

*Vonk

, Celik

, Jolij

, & Stoeller

(2005). Effects of unconditional positive regard and self–reflection on self–esteem. Unpublished manuscript, Nijmegen University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

79.

Wilson

T. D.

, Lindsey

, & Schooler

T. Y.

(2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.

80.

*Zeigler–Hill

(2006). Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self–esteem: Implications for narcissism and self–esteem instability. Journal of Personality, 74, 119–143.

81.

*Zeigler–Hill

, & Terry

(2007). Perfectionism and explicit self–esteem: The moderating role of implicit self–esteem. Self and Identity, 6, 137–153.

How to Administer the Initial Preference Task

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References