Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A new approach to the construction of short questionnaires is introduced: ‘comprehensive single items’ (CSI) are developed with the intention to match expert descriptions of a construct as closely as possible. Based on this idea, a 60–item questionnaire, the ‘Short Five’ (S5) is constructed for measuring 30 facets of the Five–Factor Model. Studies in Estonian, Finnish, English, and German showed that the S5 domain scales had correlations over 0.8 with their counterparts in longer questionnaires, and that the factor structure was similar to that of the normative US NEO–PI–R sample. The S5 can be recommended for large–scale studies where participants’ time is limited. The CSI approach can be successfully used in short scale development, in addition to more traditional methods. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

five-factor model short questionnaires single-item scales

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdel–Khalek

A. M.

(2006).Measuring happiness with a single–item scale.Social Behavior and Personality,34,139–150.

Ames

D. R.

, Rose

, & Anderson

C. P.

(2006).The NPI–16 as a short measure of narcissism.Journal of Research in Personality,40,440–450.

Back

M. D.

, Schmuckle

S. C.

, & Egloff

(2009).Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self–concept of personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,97,533–548.

Bergman

(2003).NEO PI–R: Manual svensk version [NEO PI–R: Swedish version manual].Stockholm:Psykologiförlaget.

Borsboom

(2005).Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Burisch

(1984a).You don't always get what you pay for: Measuring depression with short and simple versus long and sophisticated scales.Journal of Research in Personality,18,81–98.

Burisch

(1984b).Approaches to personality inventory construction. A comparison of merits.American Psychologist,39,214–227.

Clark

L. A.

, & Watson

(1995).Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.Psychological Assessment,7,309–319.

Costa

P. T.

Jr. , & McCrae

R. R.

(1992).Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI–R) and NEO five–factor inventory (NEO–FFI) professional manual.Odessa, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

10.

Costa

P. T.

Jr. , & McCrae

R. R.

(1995).Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.Journal of Personality Assessment,64,21–50.

11.

Costa

P. T.

Jr. , McCrae

R. R.

, & Dye

D. A.

(1991).Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory.Personality and Individual Differences,12,887–898.

12.

Denissen

J. J. A.

, Geenen

, Selfhout

, & van Aken

M. A. G.

(2008).Single–item Big Five ratings in a social network design.European Journal of Personality,22,37–54.

13.

Diener

(1984).Subjective well–being.Psychological Bulletin,95,542–575.

14.

Edwards

A. L.

(1970).The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories.New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

15.

Ekman

(1994).Strong evidence for universals in facial expression: A reply to Russell's mistaken critique.Psychological Bulletin,115,268–287.

16.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1999).A broad–bandwidth, public–domain, personality inventory measuring the lower–level facets of several five–factor models. In Mervielde

, Deary

, De Fruyt

, & Ostendorf

(Eds.),Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp.7–28).Tilburg:Tilburg University Press.

17.

Goldberg

L. R.

, Johnson

J. A.

, Eber

H. W.

, Hogan

, Ashton

M. C.

, Cloninger

C. R.

, et al.(2006).The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public–domain personality measures.Journal of Research in Personality,40,84–96.

18.

Herzberg

P. Y.

, & Brähler

(2006).Assessing the Big–Five personality domains via short forms.European Journal of Psychological Assessment,22,139–148.

19.

Hofmans

, Kuppens

, & Allik

(2008).Is short in length short in content? An examination of the domain representation of the Ten Item Personality Inventory scales in Dutch Language.Personality and Individual Differences,45,750–755.

20.

Hofstee

W. K. B.

(2002).The questionnaire construction of personality: Pragmatics of personality assessment. In Braun

H. I.

, Jackson

D. N.

, & Wiley

D. E.

(Eds.),The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp.19–35).Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

Hofstee

W. K. B.

, Ten Berge

J. M. F.

, & Hendriks

A. A. J.

(1998).How to score questionnaires.Personality and Individual Differences,25,897–909.

22.

Horn

J. L.

(1965).A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis.Psychometrika,30,179–185.

23.

International Personality Item Pool.: A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences (http://ipip.ori.org/). Internet Web Site.

24.

John

O. P.

, Hampson

S. E.

, & Goldberg

L. R.

(1991).The basic level in personality–trait hierarchies: Studies of trait use and accessibility in different contexts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,60,348–361.

25.

John

O. P.

, Naumann

L. P.

, & Soto

C. J.

(2008).Paradigm shift to the integrative Big–Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John

O. P.

, Robins

R. W.

, & Pervin

L. A.

(Eds.),Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp.114–158).New York, NY:Guilford Press.

26.

Knowles

E. S.

, & Condon

C. A.

(1999).Why people say ‘Yes’: A dual–process theory of acquiescence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,77,379–386.

27.

Konstabel

, Aavik

, & Allik

(2006).Social desirability and consensual validity of personality traits.European Journal of Personality,20,549–566.

28.

Konstabel

, & Virkus

(2006).How similar are the conceptual and empirical structures of personality traits? European Journal of Personality,20,337–353.

29.

Lewis

(2000).The emergence of human emotions. In Lewis

, & Haviland–Jones

J. M.

(Eds.),Handbook of emotions (pp.265–280).New York:Guilford.

30.

Lönnqvist

J.–E.

, Paunonen

S. V.

, Tuulio–Henriksson

, Lönnqvist

, & Verkasalo

(2007).Substance and style in socially desirable responding.Journal of Personality,75,291–322.

31.

Lönnqvist

J.–E.

, Paunonen

S. V.

, Verkasalo

, Leikas

, Tuulio–Henriksson

, & Lönnqvist

(2007).Personality characteristics of research volunteers.European Journal of Personality,21,1017–1030.

32.

Lönnqvist

J.–E.

, Verkasalo

, & Leikas

(2008).Viiden suuren persoonallisuusfaktorin 10, 60, ja 300 osion julkiset mittarit [10,60, and 300 item public domain measures of the Big Five].Psykologia,5,328–341.

33.

Lord

F. M.

, & Novick

M. R.

(1968).Statistical theories of mental test scores.Reading, MA:Addison–Welsley (as cited in Borsboom 2005).

34.

Lorenzo–Seva

, & ten Berge

J. M. F.

(2006).Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity.Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences,2,57–64.

35.

Markus

(1983).Self–knowledge: An expanded view.Journal of Personality,51,543–565.

36.

McCrae

R. R.

, & Costa

P. T.

Jr. ,(1996).Towards a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical context for the five–factor model. In Wiggins

J. S.

(Ed.),The five–factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp.51–87).New York:Guilford.

37.

McCrae

R. R.

, & Costa

P. T.

Jr. ,(2007).Brief versions of the NEO PI–3.Journal of Individual Differences,28,116–128.

38.

McCrae

R. R.

, Kurtz

J. E.

, Yamagata

, & Terracciano

(2011).Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity.Personality and Social Psychology Review15,28–50.

39.

Mõttus

, Allik

, Konstabel

, Kangro

E.–M.

, & Pullmann

(2008).Beliefs about the relationships between personality and intelligence.Personality and Individual Differences,45,457–462.

40.

Mõttus

, Pullmann

, & Allik

(2006).Towards more readable Big Five personality inventories.European Journal of Psychological Assessment,22,149–157.

41.

Ostendorf

, & Angleitner

(2004).NEO–Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, Revidierte Fassung [NEO Personality Inventory after Costa and McCrae, Revised].Göttingen, Germany:Hogrefe.

42.

Paunonen

S. V.

(1998).Hierarchical organization of personality and prediction of behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74,538–556.

43.

Paunonen

S. V.

(2003).Big Five factors of personality and replicated prediction of behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84,411–424.

44.

Paunonen

S. V.

, & Ashton

M. C.

(2001).Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81,524–539.

45.

Paunonen

S. V.

, Haddock

, Försterling

, & Keinonen

(2003).Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behaviour across cultures.European Journal of Personality,17,413–433.

46.

Paunonen

S. V.

, Rothstein

M. G.

, & Jackson

D. N.

(1999).Narrow reasoning about the use of broad personality measures for personnel selection.Journal of Organizational Behavior,20,389–405.

47.

Peabody

, & De Raad

(2002).The substantive nature of psycholexical personality factors: A comparison across languages.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83,983–997.

48.

Perugini

, & Gallucci

(1997).A hierarchical faceted model of the Big Five.European Journal of Personality,11,279–301.

49.

Podsakoff

P. M.

, MacKenzie

S. B.

, Lee

J.–Y.

, & Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003).Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology,88,879–903.

50.

Pullmann

(2004).Report on a short 60–item version of EPIP–NEO. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Tartu.

51.

Rammstedt

, & John

O. P.

(2007).Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10–item short version of the big five inventory in English and German.Journal of Research in Personality,41,203–212.

52.

Rammstedt

, & Rammsayer

T. H.

(2002).Self–estimated intelligence: Gender differences, relationship to psychometric intelligence and moderating effects of level of education.European Psychologist,7,275–284.

53.

Robins

R. W.

, Hendin

H. M.

, & Trzesniewski

K. H.

(2001).Measuring global self–esteem: Construct validation of a single–item measure and the Rosenberg Self–Esteem scale.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,27,151–161.

54.

Seibert

S. E.

, Crant

J. M.

, & Kraimer

M. L.

(1999).Proactive personality and career success.Journal of Applied Psychology,84,416–427.

55.

Simms

L. J.

, & Watson

(2007).The construct validation approach to personality scale construction. In Robins

, Fraley

, & Krueger

(Eds.),Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. (pp.240–258).New York:Guilford Press.

56.

Smith

G. T.

, McCarthy

D. M.

, & Anderson

K. G.

(2000).On the sins of short–form development.Psychological Assessment,12,102–111.

57.

Terracciano

, Abdel–Khalek

A. M.

, Adam

, Adamovova

, Ahn

, et al.(2005).National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures.Science,310,96–100.

58.

Wanous

J. P.

, Reichers

A. E.

, & Hudy

M. J.

(1997).Overall job satisfaction: How good are single–item measures.Journal of Applied Psychology,82,247–252.

59.

Watson

(2000).Mood and temperament.New York:Guilford.

60.

Williams

J. W.

Jr. , Mulrow

C. D.

, Kroenke

, Dhanda

, Badgett

R. G.

, Omori

, et al.(1999).Case–finding for depression in primary care: A randomized trial.The American Journal of Medicine,106,36–43.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.46 MB

The ‘Short Five’ (S5): Measuring Personality Traits Using Comprehensive Single Items

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material