The averaged judgment of knowledgeable others provides the best available point of reference both for the definition of personality structure in general and for assessing someone's personality in particular. Self‐judgments, as in personality questionnaires, are intrinsically deficient because judgment errors cannot be averaged out. The recommended procedure for assessing someone's personality is to give a personality questionnaire, phrased in the third person singular, to those who know the target best. This set may or may not include the target person as a judge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmelangM.BorkenauP. (1982). ‘Ueber die faktorielle Struktur und externe Validität einiger Fragenbogen‐Skalen zur Erfassung von Dimensionen der Extraversion und emotionalen Labilität' ('On the factor structure and external validity of a number of questionnaire scales for measuring dimensions of extra version and emotional instability')’, Zeitschrift fur Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 3:119–146.
2.
BorkenauP.LieblerA. (1993). ‘Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self‐ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65:546–553.
3.
BouchardT. J. (1993). ‘ Genetic and environmental influences on adult personality: evaluating the evidence’. In: Hettema, J. and Deary, I. J. (Eds), Foundations of Personality, pp.15–44, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
4.
BrownW. (1910). ‘Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities’, British Journal of Psychology, 3:296–322.
5.
CattellR. B. (1946). Description and Measurement of Personality, World Book Company, New York.
6.
CattellR. B. (1957). Personality and Motivation: Structure and Measurement, World Book Company, New York.
7.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1988). ‘Personality in adulthood: a six‐year longitudinal study of self‐reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54:853–863.
8.
DigmanJ. M. (1991). ‘Personality structure: emergence of the five‐factor model’, Annual Review of Psychology, 41:417–440.
9.
FunderD. C. (1991). ‘Global trails: a neo‐Allportian approach to personality’, Psychological Sciences, 2:31–39.
10.
FunderD. C. (1994). Personal communication, February 15.
11.
FunderD. C.SneedC. D. (1993). ‘Behavioral manifestations of personality: an ecological approach to judgmental accuracy’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64:479–490.
12.
GaltonF. (1884). ‘Measurement of character’, Fortnightly Review, 36:179–185.
13.
GoldbergL. R. (1993). Personal communication, November 8.
14.
GoldbergL. R.KilkowskiJ. M. (1985). ‘The prediction of semantic consistency in self‐descriptions: characteristics of persons and of terms that affect the consistency of response to antonym and synonym pairs’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48:82–98.
15.
HendriksA. A. J.HofsteeW. K. B.De RaadB. (1993).Construction of the AB5C Personality Questionnaire, paper presented at the 2nd EAPA Conference, Groningen, August 25–27,1993.
16.
HofsteeW. K. B. (1983). ‘Beoordelingen van subsidie‐aanvragen voor onderwijsonderzoek: een psychometrische evaluatie' ('Ratings of grant requests in educational research: a psychometric evaluation')’, Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 8:273–284.
17.
HofsteeW. K. B. (1990). ‘The use of everyday personality language for scientific purposes’, European Journal of Personality, 4:77–88.
18.
HofsteeW. K. B. (1993). ‘Uitbuiting van de dagelijkse ervaring' ('Exploiting everyday experience')’, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 48:277–287.
19.
HofsteeW. K. B.SchaapmanH. (1990). ‘Bets beat polls: averaged predictions of election outcomes’, Acta Politica, 25:257–270.
20.
HoganR. (1994). A socioanalytic perspective on the five factor model. In: Wiggins, J. S. (Ed), The Five Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives, Guilford, New York, in press.
21.
JohnO. P.RobinsR. W. (1993). ‘Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self’, Journal of Personality, 61:521–551.
22.
JohnO. P.RobinsR. W. (1994). ‘Accuracy and bias in self‐perception: individual differences in self‐enhancement and the role of narcissism’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66:206–219.
23.
JohnsonJ. A. (1994). ‘ Units of analysis for the description and explanation of personality’. In: Hogan, R. , Johnson, J. A. and Briggs, S. R. (Eds), Handbook of Personality Psychology, Academic, San Diego, CA.
24.
JonesE. E.NisbettR. E. (1971). ‘ The actor and the observer: divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior’. In: Jones, E. E. , Kanouse, D. E. , Kelley, H. H. , Nisbett, R. E. , Valins, S. and Weiner, B. (Eds), Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, pp.79–94, General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ.
25.
KennyD. A. (1991). ‘A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception’, Psychological Review, 98:155–163.
26.
MarshH. W.ByrneB. M. (1993). ‘Do we see ourselves as others infer: a comparison of self–other agreement on multiple dimensions of self‐concept from two continents’, Australian Journal of Psychology, 45:49–58.
27.
McCraeR. R. (1993). Personal communication, December 6.
28.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1989). ‘ Different points of view: self‐reports and ratings in the assessment of personality’. In: Forgas, J. P. and Innes, M. J. (Eds), Recent Advances in Social Psychology: An International Perspective, pp.429–439, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
29.
PervinL. A. (1994). ‘A critical analysis of current trait theory’, Psychology Inquiry, 5:103–113.
30.
RümelinG. (1890). ‘Ueber die Temperamente' ('About temperaments')’, Deutsche Rundschau, 64:397–412.
31.
ScheerensJ.BeemA. L. (1986). ‘Ratings of requests for grants in educational research revisited’, Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 11:67–82.
32.
SpearmanC. (1910). ‘Correlation calculated from faulty data’, British Journal of Psychology, 3:271–295.
33.
Van den HoutM. (1993). Personal communication, December 8.
34.
WigginsJ. S. (1973). Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.