The aim of this research was to investigate teachers' perception of the concept of impulsivity and its relation to the concept of reflectivity. Teacher rating scales for both concepts were constructed by means of the prototype method (Study 1). It appeared that impulsivity refers to social behaviour, whereas reflectivity is more cognitive in character. A Principal Components Analysis (Study 2) showed that the item pools for impulsive and reflective behaviour account for separate components. It is concluded that impulsivity and reflectivity as perceived by teachers are not two extremes of one dimension, but refer to different behavioural domains: social and cognitive.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarrattE. S. (1985a). ‘ Impulsiveness defined within a system model of personality’. In: Spielberger, C. D. and Butcher, J. N. (Eds), Advances in Personality Assessment, Vol. 5, pp.113–132, Erlbaum, London.
2.
BarrattE. S. (1985b). ‘ Impulsiveness subtraits: arousal and information processing’. In: Spence, J. T. and Izard, C. E. (Eds), Motivation, Emotion, and Personality, pp.137–146, Elsevier, North‐Holland, Amsterdam.
3.
BjorklundD. M.ButterE. J. (1973). ‘Can cognitive impulsivity be predicted from classroom behaviour?’, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 123:185–194.
4.
BlackmanS.GoldsteinK. M. (1982). ‘Cognitive styles and learning disabilities’, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15:106–115.
5.
BlockJ. (1989). ‘Critique of the act frequency approach to personality’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56:234–245.
6.
BlockJ.BlockJ. H.HarringtonD. M. (1974). ‘Some misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection‐impulsivity’, Developmental Psychology, 10:611–632.
7.
BorkenauP. (1988). ‘The multiple classification of acts and the big five factors of personality’, Journal of Research in Personality, 22:337–352.
8.
BroughtonR. (1984). ‘A prototype strategy for construction of personality scales’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47:1334–1346.
9.
BroughtonR. (1990). ‘The prototype concept in personality assessment’, Canadian Psychology, 31:26–37.
10.
BussD. M.CraikK. H. (1980). ‘The act frequency approach to personality’, Psychological Review, 90:105–126.
11.
CantwellD. P. (1988). ‘ DSM‐III studies’. In: Rutter, M. , Tume, A. H. and Lann, J. S. (Eds), Assessment and Diagnosis in Child Psychopathology, pp.3–36, David Fulton Publishers, London.
12.
CattellR. B. (1966). ‘ The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis’. In: Cattell, R. B. (Ed.), Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, pp.174–243, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.
13.
Das‐SmaalE. A. (1989). Attentional Problems at School: Overview of a Research Project, Internal publication, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
14.
Das‐SmaalE. A. (1990). ‘ Biases in categorization’. In: Caverni, J. P. , Fabre, J. M. and Gonzalez, M. (Eds), Cognitive Biases, pp.349–386, Elsevier, North‐Holland, Amsterdam.
15.
Das‐SmaalE. A.De LeeuwL.OrlebekeJ. F. (1987).‘Is er iets mis met de aandacht van het schoolkind?’ [Is there something wrong with the attention of the school‐child?], Pedagogische Studiën, 64:1–15.
16.
De JongP. F. (1988). ‘An application of the prototype scale construction strategy to the assessment of student motivation’, Journal of Personality, 56:487–507.
17.
EgelandB.WeinbergR. A. (1976). ‘The Matching Familiar Figures Test: a look at its psychometric credibility’, Child Development, 47:483–491.
18.
EysenckS. B. G.PearsonP. R.EastingG.AllsopJ. F. (1985). ‘Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults’, Personality and Individual Differences, 6:613–619.
19.
FehrB.RussellJ. A. (1984). ‘Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113:464–486.
20.
GerbingD. W.AhadiS. A.PattonJ. H. (1987). ‘Toward a conceptualization of impulsivity: components across the behavioural and self‐report domains’, Multivariate Behavioural Research, 22:357–379.
21.
GoldbergL. R. (1990). ‘An alternative “description of personality”: the big‐five structure’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59:1216–1229.
22.
GrimmK. H.MeyerW. U. (1976). ‘Impulsivität‐Reflexivität: ein korrekturbedürftiges Konzept’ [Impulsivity‐reflectivity: a faulty concept], Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 78: Whole No. 587.
23.
HopkinsJ.PerlmanT.HechtmanL.WeissG. (1979). ‘Cognitive style in adults originally diagnosed as hyperactives’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20:209–216.
24.
KaganJ.PearsonL.WelchL. (1966). ‘Conceptual impulsivity and inductive reasoning’, Child Development, 37:583–594.
25.
KaganJ.RosmanB. L.DayD.AlbertJ.PhillipsW. (1964). ‘Information processing in the child: significance of analytic and reflective attitudes’, Psychological Monographs, 78: Whole No. 578.
26.
KohnstammG. A. (1991). ‘The roots of the big five: the case of conscientiousness’, Paper presented at the 5th International Congress of the Individual Society for the Study of Individual Differences, Oxford.
27.
LakoffG. (1986). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Tell Us About the Nature of Thought, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
28.
LuengoM. A.Carillo‐de‐la‐PeñaM. T.OteroJ. M. (1991). ‘The components of impulsiveness: a comparison of the 1.7 Impulsiveness questionnaire and the Barratt impulsiveness scale’, Personality and Individual Differences, 12:657–667.
29.
MagnussonD. (1984). ‘ On the situational context in psychological research’. In: Lagerspetz, K. M. J. and Niemi, P. (Eds), Psychology in the 1990's, pp.95–105, Elsevier, North‐Holland, Amsterdam.
30.
MesserS. B. (1976). ‘Reflection‐impulsivity: a review’, Psychological Bulletin, 83:1026–1052.
31.
MilichR.KramerJ. (1984). ‘ Reflections on impulsivity: an empirical investigation of impulsivity as a construct’. In: Gadow, K. (Ed.), Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, Vol. 3, pp.57–94, JAI, Greenwich, CT.
32.
PickA. D. (1983). ‘ Comments on Kinsbourne's chapter’. In: Perlmutter, M. (Ed.), Development and Policy Concerning Children with Special Needs, pp.167–174, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
33.
RoschE. (1978). ‘ Principles of categorization’. In: Lloyd, B. B. (Ed.), Cognition and Categorization, pp.27–48, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
34.
RoschE.MervisC. B. (1975). ‘Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories’, Cognitive Psychology, 7:573–605.
35.
SalkindN. J.WrightJ. C. (1977). ‘The development of reflection‐impulsivity and cognitive efficiency’, Human Development, 20:377–387.
36.
SergeantJ. A.Van VelthovenR.VirginiaA. (1979). ‘Hyperactivity, impulsivity and reflectivity: an examination of their relationship and implications for clinical child psychology’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20:47–66.
37.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). ‘Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability’, Psychological Bulletin, 86:420–428.
38.
SternbergR. J. (1985). ‘Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49:607–627.
39.
StunnenbergY.VerweyI. (1985). ‘ Sociale impulsiviteit, de ontwikkeling van een meetinstrument’ [Social impulsivity, the development of a measuring device]. Unpublished report, Katholieke Universiteit, Nijmegen.
40.
TiedemanJ. (1983). ‘Der kognitive Stil Impulsivität‐Reflexivität: Eine kritische Bestand Aufnahme’ [The cognitive style of Impulsivity‐Reflectivity: a critical view], Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologische und Pädagogische Psychologie, 15:66–74.
41.
Van HeckG. L. (1984). ‘ The construction of a general taxonomy of situations’, In: Bonarius, H. , Van Heck, G. L. and Smid, N. (Eds), Personality Psychology in Europe: Theoretical and Empirical Developments, Vol. 1, pp.149–164, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse.
42.
Van HeckG. L. (1989). ‘ Situation concepts: definitions and classification’. In: Hettema, P. J. (Ed.), Personality and Environment: Assessment of Human Adaption, pp.53–69,241–259, Wiley, Chichester.
43.
VisserM. R. M. (1993) ‘ Cognitive characteristics of Impulsive Children’, Doctoral dissertation, in preparation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
44.
WagnerI.CimiottiE. (1975). ‘Impulsive und reflexive Kinder prüfen Hypothesen: Strategien beim Problemlösen, aufgezeigt an Blickbewegungen’ [Hypotheses testing by impulsive and reflective children, deduced from eye‐movement measurements], Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie, 7:1–15.
45.
WeissG. (1985). ‘Hyperactivity: overview and new directions’, Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 8:737–753.
46.
WelsP. A. (1989). ‘ Social impulsivity: development of an instrument for assessing social aspects of impulsivity’, Poster and Hand‐out presented at the International Symposium on AD‐HD(Attention Deficit‐Hyperactivity Disorder), Amsterdam.
47.
WrightJ. C.VlietstraA. G. (1975). ‘ The development of selective attention: from perceptual exploration to logical search’. In: Reese, H. W. (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 10, pp.195–239, Academic Press, New York.
48.
ZelnikerT.JeffreyW. E. (1976). ‘Reflective and impulsive children: strategies of information processing underlying differences in problem solving’, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41(5, Serial No. 168).
