AllportG. W.OdbertH. S. (1936). ‘Trait‐names: a psycho‐logical study’. Psychological Monographs, 47: No.211.
2.
AllportG. W.VernonP. E. (1933). Studies in Expressive Movement, Macmillan, New York.
3.
AmelangM. (1986). ‘ Fragebogen‐Tests und experimentalpsychologische Variablen als Korrelate der Persönlichkeitsdimensionen Extraversion/Introversion (E/I) und Neurotizismus (N)' [Questionnaire‐tests and experimental psychological variables as correlates of the personality traits Extraversion/Introversion (E/I) and Neuroticism (N)].’ In: Amelang, M. (Ed), Bericht über den 35. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Heidelberg1986, Vol. 2, pp.403–416, Hogrefe, Göttingen, FRG.
4.
AngleitnerA.OstendorfF. (1989). 'Personality factors via self‐ and peer‐ratings based on a representative sample of German trait descriptive terms', Paper presented at the 1st European Congress of Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2‐7 July.
5.
AngleitnerA.RiemannR. (1991). ‘ What can we learn from the discussion of personality questionnaires for the construction of temperament inventories?’ In: Strelau, J. and Angleitner, A. (Eds), Explorations in Temperament, Plenum Press, New York (in press).
6.
AngleitnerA.JohnO. P.LöhrF. J. (1986). ‘ It's what you ask and how you ask it: an itemmetric analysis of personality questionnaires.’ In: Angleitner, A. and Wiggins, J. S. (Eds), Personality Assessment via Questionnaires: Current Issues in Theory and Measurement, pp.61–108, Springer, Heidelberg, FRG.
7.
BaumgartenF. (1933). ‘ Die Charaktereigenschaften' [The character traits].’ In: Baumgarten, F. (Ed), Beiträge zur Charakter‐ und Persönlichkeitsforschung[Contributions to Research in Character and Personality], Whole No. I, Francke, Bern, Switzerland.
8.
BorkenauP. (1986a). 'Systematic distortions in the recognition of trait information'. In: Angleitner, A. , Furnham, A. and Van Heck, G. L. (Eds), Personality Psychology in Europe: Current Trends and Controversies, Vol. 2, pp.177–191, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands.
9.
BorkenauP. (1986b). ‘Toward an understanding of trait interrelations: acts as instances for several traits’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51:371–381.
10.
BrokkenF. B. (1978). The Language of Personality, Krips, Meppel, The Netherlands.
11.
BrowneJ. A.HowarthE. (1977). ‘A comprehensive factor analysis of personality questionnaire items: a test of twenty putative factor hypotheses’, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12:399–427.
12.
BuchsbaumM. S. (1976). ‘ Self‐regulation of stimulus intensity: augmenting/reducing and the average evoked response’. In: Schwartz G. E. and Shapiro, D. (Eds), Consciousness and Self‐regulation, Plenum Press, New York.
13.
BussD. M. (1984). ‘Evolutionary biology and personality psychology: toward a conception of human nature and individual differences’, American Psychologist, 39:1135–1147.
14.
BussD. M. (1991). ‘Evolutionary personality psychology’, Annual Review of Psychology, 42:459–491.
15.
BussD. M.CraikK. H. (1983). ‘The act frequency approach to personality’, Psychological Review, 90:105–126.
16.
CattellR. B. (1946). The Description and Measurement of Personality, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
17.
CattellR. B. (1957). Personality and Motivation Structure and Measurement, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
18.
CattellR. B. (1968). ‘Trait‐view theory of perturbations in ratings and self ratings (L (BR)‐and Q‐data): its application to obtaining pure trait score estimates in questionnaires’, Psychological Review, 75:96–113.
19.
CattellR. B. (1977). ‘ A more sophisticated look at structure: perturbation, sampling, role, and observer trait‐view theories’. In: Cattell R. B. and Dreger, R. M. (Eds), Handbook of Modern Personality Theory, pp.166–220, Halsted Press, New York.
20.
CattellR. B.SchuergerJ. (1976). The O‐A (Objective‐Analytic) Personality Battery, Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Champaign, IL.
21.
ComreyA. L. (1970). Manual for the Comrey Personality Scales, Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, CA.
22.
DudychaG. J. (1936). ‘An objective study of personality research’, Archives of Psychology, 29:1–53.
23.
EmmonsR. A. (1986). ‘Personal strivings: an approach to personality and subjective wellbeing’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51:1058–1068.
24.
EysenckH. J. (1986). ‘ Models and paradigms in personality research’. In: Angleitner, A. , Furnham, A. and Van Heck, G. L. (Eds), Personality Psychology in Europe: Current Trends and Controversies, Vol. 2, pp.213–224, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands.
25.
EysenckH. J.EysenckM. W. (1985). Personality and Individual Differences. A Natural Science Approach, Plenum Press, New York.
26.
FahrenbergJ. (1991). ‘ Differential psychophysiology and the diagnosis of temperament’. In: Strelau, J. and Angleitner, A. (Eds), Explorations in Temperament, Plenum Press, New York (in press).
27.
FunderD. C. (1989). ‘ Accuracy in personality judgement and the dancing bear’. In: Buss D. M. and Cantor, N. (Eds), Personality Psychology. Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, pp.210–223, Springer, New York.
28.
GoldbergL. R. (1981). ‘ Language and individual differences: the search for universals in personality lexicons’. In: Wheeler, L. (Ed), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 2, pp.141–165, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
29.
GoldbergL. R. (1982). ‘ From ace to zombi: some explorations in the language of personality’. In: Spielberger C. D. and Butcher, J. N. (Eds), Advances in Personality Assessment, Vol. 1, pp.203–234, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
30.
GuilfordJ. S.ZimmermanW. S.GuilfordJ. P. (1976). The Guilford‐Zimmerman Temperament Survey Handbook. Twenty‐five Years of Research and Application, Edits Publishers, San Diego, CA.
31.
HartshorneH.MayM. A. (1928). Studies in the Nature of Character. Volume I. Studies in Deceit, Macmillan, New York.
32.
HettemaP. J. (1979). Personality and Adaptation, North‐Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
33.
HofsteeW. K. B. (1977). ‘ Preliminary steps in structuring the set of 1204 Dutch personality‐descriptive adjectives’, Heymans Bulletins, HB‐77‐302 IN, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
34.
JohnO. P.AngleitnerA.OstendorfF. (1988). ‘The lexical approach to personality: a historical review of trait taxonomic research’, European Journal of Personality, 2:171–203.
35.
KellyG. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Norton, New York.
36.
LittleB. R. (1983). ‘Personal projects: a rationale and method for investigation’, Environment and Behavior, 15:273–309.
37.
McCraeR. R. (1989). ‘ Why I advocate the five‐factor model: joint factor analyses of the NEO‐PI with other instruments’. In: Buss D. M. and Cantor, N. (Eds), Personality Psychology. Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, pp.237–245, Springer, New York.
38.
MischelW. (1968). Personality and Assessment, Wiley, New York.
39.
MurrayH. A. (1938). Explorations in Personality, Oxford University Press, New York.
40.
NewcombT. M. (1929). Consistency of Certain Extravert‐Introvert Behavior Patterns in 51 Problem Boys, Columbia University, Teachers College, Bureau of Publications, , New York.
41.
NormanT. (1967). 2,800 Personality Trait Descriptors: Normative Operating Characteristics for a University Population, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, MI.
42.
OlweusD. (1980). ‘The consistency issue in personality psychology revisited–with special reference to aggression’, British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19:377–390.
43.
OstendorfF.AngleitnerA.RuchW. (1986). Die Multitrait‐Multimethod Analyse. Konvergente und diskriminante Validität der Personality Research Form [The Multitrait‐Multimethod Analysis. Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the PRF], Hogrefe, Göttingen, FRG.
44.
ShwederR. A. (1977). ‘Likeness and likelihood in everyday thought: magical thinking in judgements about personality’, Current Anthropology, 18:637–658.
45.
ShwederR. A.D'AndradeR. G. (1980). ‘ The systematic distortion hypothesis’. In: Shweder, R. A. (Ed), Fallible Judgement in Behavioural Research. New Directions for the Methodology of Social and Behavioural Science, Vol. 4, pp.37–58, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.
46.
StrelauJ. (1987). ‘The concept of temperament in personality research’, European Journal of Personality, 1:107–117.
47.
StrelauJ. (1991). 'Are psychophysiological scores good candidates for diagnosing temperament/personality traits and for a demonstration of the construct validity of psychometrically measured traits?',European Journal of Personality, in press.
48.
StrelauJ.AngleitnerA.BantelmannJ.RuchW. (1990). ‘The Strelau Temperament Inventory Revised (STI‐R): theoretical considerations and scale development’, European Journal of Personality, 4:209–235.
49.
ThomaeH. (1960). Der Mensch in der Entscheidung[Man in his Deciding], J. A. Barth, München, FRG.
50.
WrightJ. C.MischelW. (1987). ‘A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: the local predictability of social behavior’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53:1159–1177.