The five‐factor model of personality has repeatedly emerged from lexical studies of natural languages. When adjective‐based factor scales are correlated with other personality measures, the adequacy and comprehensiveness of the five‐factor model are demonstrated at a broad level. However, English language adjectives do not necessarily capture more subtle distinctions within the five factors. In particular, of several facets of the Openness factor, only Openness to Ideas and Values are well represented in single terms. Openness to Fantasy, Aesthetics, Feelings, and Actions can be expressed in phrases, sentences, and literary passages—as excerpts from Bunin's ‘Lika’ illustrate— but not in single words. To maintain its relevance to personality psychology, the study of personality language must continue to examine empirical links to other personality systems and must move beyond the dictionary to analyses of natural language speech and writing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AschS. E. (1946). ‘Forming impressions of personality’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41:258–290.
2.
BlockJ. (1961). The Q‐sort Method in Personality Assessment and Psychiatric Research, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
3.
BuninI. (1963). ‘Lika’. ‘The Gentleman from San Francisco’ and Other Stories (O. Shartse, Trans.), pp.139–249, Washington Square, New York. (Original work written in 1933.)
4.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
5.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1988a). ‘From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five‐factor model’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55:258–265.
6.
CostaP. T.BuschC. M.ZondermanA. B.McCraeR. R. (1986). ‘Correlations of MMPI factor scales with measures of the five‐factor model of personality’, Journal of Personality Assessment, 50:640–650.
7.
De BoeckP.MattheusR. (1989). ‘Categories of everyday third‐person talk’, Paper presented at the Invited Workshop on Personality Language, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
8.
GoldbergL. R. (1981). ‘ Language and individual differences: the search for universals in personality lexicons’. In: Wheeler, L. (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 2, pp.141–165, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
9.
GoldbergL. R. (1982). ‘ From Ace to Zombie: some explorations in the language of personality’. In: Spielberger, C. D. and Butcher, J. N. (Eds), Advances in Personality Assessment, Vol. 1, pp.203–234, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
10.
GoughH. G. (1987). California Psychological Inventory Administrator's Guide, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
11.
GoughH. G.HeilbrunA. B. (1983). The Adjective Check List Manual,1983 ed., Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
12.
HampsonS. E. (1990). ‘Reconciling inconsistent information: impressions of personality from combinations of traits’, European Journal of Personality, 4: this issue.
13.
HofsteeW. K. B. (1990). ‘The use of everyday personality language for scientific purposes’, European Journal of Personality, 4: this issue.
14.
JohnO. P. (1989). ‘ Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors’. In: Buss, D. M. and Cantor, N. (Eds), Personality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, pp.261–271, Springer‐Verlag, New York.
15.
McAdamsD. P. (1988). ‘Biography, narrative, and lives: an introduction’, Journal of Personality, 56:1–18.
16.
McCraeR. R. (1989). ‘ Why I advocate the five‐factor model: joint analyses of the NEO‐PI and other instruments’. In: Buss, D. M. and Cantor, N. (Eds), Personality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, pp.237–245. Springer‐Verlag, New York.
17.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1985a). ‘ Openness to experience’. In: Hogan, R. and Jones, W. H. (Eds), Perspectives in Personality, Vol. 1, pp.145–172. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
18.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1985b). ‘Updating Norman's “adequate taxonomy”: intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49:710–721.
19.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1987). ‘Validation of the five‐factor model of personality across instruments and observers’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52:81–90.
20.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1989a). ‘Reinterpreting the Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five‐factor model of personality’, Journal of Personality, 57:17–40.
21.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1989b). ‘The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five‐factor model’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56:586–595.
22.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (in press). ‘ Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience’. In: Briggs, S. R. , Hogan, R. and Jones, W. H. (Eds), Handbook of Personality Psychology, Academic Press, New York.
23.
McGuireW. J. (1984). ‘ Search for the self: Going beyond self‐esteem and the reactive self’. In: Zucker, R. A. , Aronoff, J. and Rabin, A. I. (Eds), Personality and the Prediction of Behavior, pp.73–120, Academic Press, New York.
24.
NormanW. T. (1963). ‘Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66:574–583.
25.
PeabodyD. (1987). ‘Selecting representative trait adjectives’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52:59–11.
26.
RogersC. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View Of Psychotherapy, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
27.
RokeachM. (1960). The Open and Closed Mind, Basic Books, New York.
28.
ShockN. W.GreulichR. C.AndresR.ArenbergD.CostaP. T.LakattaE. G.TobinJ. D. (1984). Normal Human Aging: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging(NIH Publication No. 84–2450), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
29.
TellegenA.AtkinsonG. (1974). ‘Openness to absorbing and self‐altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83:268–277.
