The main points raised by Borkenau against our challenge of the 'intuitive psychometrics' view of personality judgements are discussed, in particular his example of the link between school grades and intelligence. It is argued that the semantic similarity interpretation advanced in our paper is more adequate and more parsimonious than explanations in terms of psychometric reasoning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BorkenauP. (1988), ‘Semantic mediation or spurious correlation? A reply to Semin and Krahe's critique of Epstein and Teraspulsky’, European Journal of Personality, 2:253–258.
2.
ChaplinW. F.JohnP. P.GoldbergL. R. (1988). ‘Conceptions of states and traits: Dimensional attributes with ideals as prototypes'.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54:541–557.
3.
EpsteinS.TeraspulskyL. (1986). ‘Perception of cross‐situational consistency'.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50:1152–1160.
4.
HampsonS. E.JohnO. P.GoldbergL. R. (1986). ‘Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies of asymmetries in judgements of trait implications’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51:37–54.
5.
RoschE.ChasseinJ.SeminG. R.KrolageJ. (1984). ‘Psychometrische Modelleder Persoenlichkeit als soziale Konstruktionen: Experimentelle Untersuchungen zu Guete‐kriterien' [Psychometric models of personality as social constructions: Experimental evaluation studies],’ Schweizerische Zeitschrift fuer Psychologie, 43:91–110.
6.
SeminG. R. (1987). ‘ On the relationship between theories in ordinary language and psychology’. In: Doise, W. and Moscovici, S. (Eds), Current Issues in European Social Psychology. Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.307–348.
7.
SeminG. R.FiedlerK. (1988). ‘The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54:558–568.
8.
SeminG. R.GreensladeL. (1985). ‘Differential contributions of linguistic factors to memory based ratings: Systematizing the systematic distortion hypothesis’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49:1713–1723.
9.
SeminG. R.KrahéB. (1988). ‘Explaining perceived cross‐situational consistency: Intuitive psychometrics or semantic mediation?’, European Journal of Personality, 2:239–252.
10.
SeminG. R.ChasseinJ.RoschE.KrolageJ. (1984).Sozialpsychologische Anmerkungen zur Eingrenzung des Aussagegehaltes Psychometrischer Persoenlichkeits‐modelle' [Social psychological comments on the limits of the predictive value of psychometric personality models], Schweizerische Zeitschrift fuer Psychologic, 43:75–90.
