AdamsM., & HannaP. (2012). Your past is not their present: Time, the other, and ethnocentrism in cross–cultural personality psychology. Theory & Psychology, 22, 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311412107
2.
AdornoT. W., Frenkel–BrunswikE., LevinsonD. J., & SanfordR. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper and Row.
3.
AllenT. A., RueterA. R., AbramS. V., BrownJ. S., & DeYoungC. G. (2017). Personality and neural correlates of mentalizing ability. European Journal of Personality, 31, 599–613, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2133.
4.
AllportG. W. (1931). What is a trait of personality?The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25, 368–372, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075406.
5.
AllportG. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6.
AllportG. W. (1958). What units shall we employ? In LindzeyG. (Ed.), Assessment of human motives (p. 239–260). New York: Rinehart.
7.
AllportG. W., & OdbertH. S. (1936). Trait–names: A psycho–lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, i–171.
8.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
9.
AngleitnerA., & OstendorfF. (1989, July). Personality factors via self– and peer–ratings based on a representative sample of German trait descriptive terms. Paper presented at the First European Congress of Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
10.
AnglimJ., HorwoodS., SmillieL. D., MarreroR. J., & WoodJ. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well–being from personality: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279–323.
11.
AnglimJ., LievensF., EvertonL., GrantS. L., & MartyA. (2018). HEXACO personality predicts counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior in low–stakes and job applicant contexts. Journal of Research in Personality, 77, 11–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.003.
12.
AnglimJ., MorseG., De VriesR. E., MacCannC., & MartyA. (2017). Comparing job applicants to non–applicants using an item–level bifactor model on the HEXACO personality inventory. European Journal of Personality, 31, 669–684, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2120.
13.
AnusicI., SchimmackU., PinkusR. T., & LockwoodP. (2009). The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: The halo–alpha–beta model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1142–1156, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017159.
14.
ArthurW.Jr., & VilladoA. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.93.2.435
15.
AsendorpfJ. B. (2002). The puzzle of personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.446
16.
AshtonM. C., De VriesR. E., & LeeK. (2017) Trait variance and response style variance in the scales of the personality inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5). Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(2), 192–203, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1208210
17.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.417
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2005b). A defence of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure. European Journal of Personality, 19, 5–24, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.541.
20.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
21.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2008). The prediction of honesty–humility–related criteria by the HEXACO and five–factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006
22.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2009a). An investigation of personality types within the HEXACO personality framework. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614–0001.30.4.181
23.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2009b). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
24.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2010). On the cross–language replicability of personality factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 436–441, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.006.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2019). How well do Big Five measures capture HEXACO scale variance?Journal of Personality Assessment, 101, 567–573, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1448986.
27.
AshtonM.C., & LeeK. (2020a). Objections to the HEXACO model of personality structure, and why those objections fail. European Journal of Peronality, 34, 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2242
28.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2020b). Recovering the HEXACO personality factors—and psychoticism—from variable sets assessing normal and abnormal personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 41, 68–77, https://doi.org/10.1027/1614–0001/a000305.
29.
AshtonM.C., LeeK., & De VriesR.E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty–humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139–152, https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523838.
30.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., De VriesR. E., HendrickseJ., & BornM. Ph. (2012). The maladaptive personality traits of the personality inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2012.26.5.641
31.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., De VriesR. E., PeruginiM., GnisciA., & SergiI. (2006). The HEXACO model of personality structure and indigenous lexical personality dimensions in Italian, Dutch, and English. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 851–875, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.06.003.
32.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., & GoldbergL. R. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality–descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 707–721, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.87.5.707.
33.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., & GoldbergL. R. (2007). The IPIP–HEXACO scales: An alternative, public–domain measure of the personality constructs in the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1515–1526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.027
34.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., GoldbergL. R., & De VriesR. E. (2009). Higher–order factors of personality: Do they exist?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 79–91, https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309338467.
35.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., PeruginiM., SzarotaP., De VriesR. E., Di BlasL., BoiesK., & De RaadB. (2004). A six–factor structure of personality–descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.86.2.356.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., & VisserB. A. (2019). Where's the H? Relations between BFI–2 and HEXACO–60 scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 137, 71–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.08.013.
38.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., VisserB. A., & PozzebonJ. A. (2008). Phobic tendency within the five–factor and HEXACO models of personality structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 734–746, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.001.
39.
AshtonM. C., PaunonenS. V., & LeeK. (2014). On the validity of narrow and broad personality traits: A response to Salgado, Moscoso, and Berges (2013). Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 24–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.019.
40.
AshtonM. C., PilkingtonA. C., & LeeK. (2014). Do prosocial people prefer sweet–tasting foods? An attempted replication of Meier, Moeller, Riemer–Peltz, and Robinson (2012). Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 42–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.06.006.
41.
AshtonM. C., XiaX., & LeeK. (2020). Is there a G in HEXACO? Testing for a general factor in personality self–reports under different conditions of responding. Personality and Individual Differences, 156, 109750, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109750.
BackM. D. (2020). Editorial: A brief wish list for personality research. European Journal of Personality, 34, 3–7, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2236.
44.
BackM. D. & EgloffB. (2009). Yes we can! A plea for direct behavioral observation in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 23, 403–405.
45.
BackM. D., SchmukleS. C. & EgloffB. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self–concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533–548, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016229.
46.
BäckströmM. (2007). Higher–order factors in a five–factor personality inventory and its relation to social desirability. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015–5759.23.2.63.
47.
BäckströmM., & BjörklundF. (2016). Is the general factor of personality based on evaluative responding? Experimental manipulation of item–popularity in personality inventories. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.058.
48.
BäckströmM., BjörklundF., & LarssonM. (2009). Five–factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.013.
49.
BäckströmM., BjörklundF., & LarssonM. (2014). Criterion validity is maintained when items are evaluatively neutralized: Evidence from a full–scale five–factor model inventory. European Journal of Personality, 28, 620–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1960.
50.
BarfordK. A., ZhaoK., & SmillieL. D. (2015). Mapping the interpersonal domain: Translating between the Big Five, HEXACO, and Interpersonal Circumplex. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.038
51.
BarlowD. H., EllardK. K., Sauer–ZavalaS., BullisJ. R., & CarlJ. R. (2014). The origins of neuroticism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614544528
52.
BaumertA., SchmittM., PeruginiM., JohnsonW., BlumG., BorkenauP., … WrzusC. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31(5), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115
53.
BeckE. D., CondonD. M., & JacksonJ. J. (2019). Interindividual age differences in personality structure.
54.
BenetV., & WallerN. G. (1995). The Big Seven factor model of personality description: Evidence for its cross–cultural generality in a Spanish sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 701–718.
55.
Benet–MartinezV., & JohnO. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multi–trait multi–method analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.75.3.729.
BidermanM. D., McAbeeS. T., ChenZ. J., & HendyN. T. (2018). Assessing the evaluative content of personality questionnaires using bifactor models. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1406362
59.
BidermanM. D., McAbeeS. T., HendyN. T., & ChenZ. J. (2019). Validity of evaluative factors from Big Five and HEXACO questionnaires. Journal of Research in Personality, 80, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.04.010
BleidornW., HopwoodC. J., BackM., DenissenJ. J. A., HenneckeM., JokelaM., … ZimmermannJ. (2020). Longitudinal Experience–Wide Association Studies (LEWAS)—A framework for studying personality change. European Journal of Personality, 34, 285, 300, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2247
62.
BlockJ. (1961). The Q–sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
BloomP. (2017). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. NY: Random House.
65.
BookA., VisserB., BlaisJ., Hosker–FieldA., Methot–JonesT., GauthierN., VolkA., HoldenR., & D'AgataM. (2016). Unpacking more “evil”: What is at the core of the Dark Tetrad?Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.009
66.
BookA., VisserB. A., & VolkA. (2015). Unpacking “evil”: Claiming the core of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.016.
67.
BoothT., & MurrayA. L. (2018). How factor analysis has shaped personality trait psychology. In The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing (pp. 933–951). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch29
68.
BoxG. E. P., & LucenoA. (1997). Statistical control by monitoring and feedback adjustment. John Wiley, New York.
69.
BratkoD, MasnjakT., & PocrnićM. (2019). Impulsive buying within HEXACO model framework. Unpublished raw data.
70.
BresinK. (2019). Impulsivity and aggression: A meta–analysis using the UPPS model of impulsivity. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 48, 124–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.003.
71.
BrewerM. B. (2000). Research design and issues of validity. In ReisH. T. & JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 3–16). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
72.
BrokkenF.B. (1978). The language of personality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Meppel, The Netherlands: Kripps.
73.
BrownA. D. (2017). The dynamics of affect: Using Newtonian mechanics, reinforcement sensitivity theory, and the cues–tendencies–actions model to simulate individual differences in emotional experience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University.
74.
BrownM. C. (1994). Using Gini–style indices to evaluate the spatial patterns of health practitioners: Theoretical considerations and an application based on Alberta data. Social Science & Medicine, 38, 1243–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277–9536(94)90189–9
75.
BrunswikE. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 49(6), 654–656.
76.
BucherM. A., & SamuelD. B. (2019). Development of a short form of the abridged Big Five–dimensional circumplex model to aid with the organization of personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101, 16–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1413382.
77.
CampbellA. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 223–252.
78.
CampbellW. K., & MillerJ. D. (2011). The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. New York: Wiley.
79.
CapraraG. V., & ZimbardoP. G. (2004). Personalizing politics: A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist, 59(7), 581–594, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003–066X.59.7.581.
80.
CarusoJ. C. (2000). Reliability generalization of the Neo Personality Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970484
81.
CattellR. B. (1943a). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054116
82.
CattellR. B. (1943b). The description of personality: Foundations of trait measurement. Psychological Review, 50, 559–594, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057276.
83.
CattellR. B., EberH. W. & TatsuokaM. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire. Champagne, Ill.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
ChirumboloA., & LeoneL. (2010). Personality and politics: The role of the HEXACO model of personality in predicting ideology and voting. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(1), 43–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.004.
86.
ChirumboloA., & LeoneL. (2014). Those who voted and supported Berlusconi. A social psychological profile of the willingly followers of a controversial political leader. In: van ProoijenJan–Willem and van LangePaul A.M. (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious about their leaders (pp. 150–174). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
87.
ChirumboloA., LeoneL. & AreniA. (2008, July). Personality and electoral choice: An Italian study within the HEXACO model of personality. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Paris.
88.
ChmielewskiM., BagbyR. M., MarkonK., RingA. J., & RyderA. G. (2014). Openness to experience, intellect, schizotypal personality disorder, and psychoticism: Resolving the controversy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_128
89.
CimaM., TonnaerF., & HauserM. D. (2010). Psychopaths know right from wrong but don't care. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 59–67, https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp051.
90.
ClarkL. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 277–257.
CohenT. R., PanterA. T., TuranN., MorseL., & KimY. (2013). Agreement and similarity in self–other perceptions of moral character. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 816–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.009
93.
CohenT. R., PanterA. T., TuranN., MorseL., & KimY. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 943–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037245
94.
ColbowA., LatinoC., WayJ., CasillasA., & McKinnissT. (2017). The ACT behavioral skills framework: How does it compare to other behavioral models? (No. R1619; p. 70).
95.
CondonD. M. (2018). The SAPA personality inventory: An empirically–derived, hierarchically–organized self–report personality assessment model. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/sc4p9
96.
ConnellyB. S., & OnesD. S. (2010). Another perspective on personality: meta–analyti integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092–1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212
97.
ConnellyB. S., OnesD. S., & HülshegerU. R. (2018). Personality in industrial, work and organizational psychology: Theory, measurement and application. In OnesD., AndersonN., ViswesvaranC., & SinangilH., The SAGE Handbook Of Industrial, Work And Organizational Psychology: Personnel psychology and employee performance (pp. 320–365). SAGE Publications Ltd: Thousand Oaks, CA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914940.n13
98.
CorrP. J. (2002). J. A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(4), 511–532, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191–8869(01)00170–2.
99.
CorrP. J. (2016). Reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaires: Structural survey with recommendations. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.045
100.
CostaP. T.Jr., & McCraeR. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five–factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258–265, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.55.2.258.
CostaP. T., & McCraeR. R. (1992b). Professional manual: Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI–R) and NEO five–factor inventory (NEO FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL.
103.
CostaP. T.Jr., & McCraeR. R. (1992c). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO–PI–R) and NEO Five–Factor Inventory (NEO–FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
104.
CostantiniG., EpskampS., BorsboomD., PeruginiM., MõttusR., WaldorpL. J., & CramerA. O. J. (2015). State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.003
105.
CostantiniG., & PeruginiM. (2018). A framework for testing causality in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 32(3), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2150
106.
CostantiniG., RichetinJ., PretiE., CasiniE., & PeruginiM. (in press). Personality traits in social interactions: A tutorial on network analysis of personality dynamics. In RauthmannJ. F. (Ed.), The handbook of personality dynamics and processes. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Press.
107.
CostantiniG., SaraulliD., & PeruginiM. (2020). Uncovering the motivational core of traits: The case of conscientiouness. European Journal of Personalityhttps://doi.org/10.1002/per.2237
108.
CramerA. O. J., van der SluisS., NoordhofA., WichersM., GeschwindN., AggenS. H., … WichersM. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can't like parties if you don't like people. European Journal of Personality, 26(4), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1866
109.
CronbachL. J. (1960). Essentials of psychological testing, 2nd edition, Harper & Row, New York.
110.
CronbachL. J., & MehlP. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281, 302, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957.
111.
CroweM. L., LynamD. R., & MillerJ. D. (2018). Uncovering the structure of agreeableness from self–report measures. Journal of Personality, 86(5), 771–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12358
112.
CroweM. L., LynamD. R., & MillerJ. D. (2019). The structure of antagonism. In MillerJ.D. & LynamD. R. (Eds.), The handbook of antagonism (pp. 53–65). Elsevier: San Diego, CA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–0–12–814627–9.00004–9
113.
CutshallC., & WatsonD. (2004). The phobic stimuli response scales: A new self–report measure of fear. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1193–1201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.003.
114.
CydersM. A., SmithG. T., SpillaneN. S., FischerS., AnnusA. M., & PetersonC. (2007). Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040–3590.19.1.107
115.
DaviesS. E., ConnellyB. S., OnesD. S., & BirklandA. S. (2015). The general factor of personality: The “Big One,” a self–evaluative trait, or a methodological gnat that won't go away?Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.006
116.
DawkinsR. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
117.
De RaadB. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word–classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality, 6, 15–29, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410060103.
118.
De RaadB., BareldsD. P. H., LevertE., OstendorfF., MlacicB., Di BlasL., HrebickovaM., SzirmakZ., SzarotaP., PeruginiM., ChurchA. T., & KatigbakM. S. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 160–173, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017184.
119.
De RaadB., BareldsD. P. H., TimmermanM.E., De RooverK., MlacicB., & ChurchA.T. (2014). Towards a pan–cultural personality structure: Input from 11 psycho–lexical studies. European Journal of Personality, 28, 497–510, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1953.
120.
De RaadB., HendriksA. J., & HofsteeW. K. (1992). Towards a refined structure of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 6, 301–319, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410060405.
121.
De RaadB., & MlačićB. (2017). The Lexical foundation of the Big Five–factor model. In WidigerR.A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 191–216). Oxford University Press, New York.
122.
De RaadB., NagyJ., SzirmákZ., & BareldsD. P. (2018). Taxonomy of Hungarian personality traits: Replication and refinement. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 4, 1–12.
123.
De VriesR. E., TyburJ. M., PolletT. V., & van VugtM. (2016). Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.04.001
124.
DecetyJ., & CowellJ. M. (2014). The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 337–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.008
125.
DecuyperM., De PauwS., De FruytF., De BolleM., & De ClercqB. J. (2009). A meta–analysis of psychopathy–, antisocial PD– and FFM associations. European Journal of Personality, 23(7), 531–565. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.729
126.
DenissenJ. J. A., SotoC. J., GeenenR., JohnO. P., & Van AkenM. A. G. (2020). A supplemental Honesty–Humility scale for the Big Five Inventory–2: Development, validation, and conceptual insights. Unpublished manuscript.
127.
DepueR. A., & CollinsP. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(3), 491–517. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x99002046
128.
DeShongH. L., GrantD. M., & Mullins–SweattS. N. (2015). Comparing models of counterproductive workplace behaviors: The five–factor model and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 55–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.001.
129.
DesimoniM., & LeoneL. (2014). Openness to experience, honesty–humility and ideological attitudes: A fine–grained analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 116–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.031.
DeYoungC. G., CareyB. E., KruegerR. F., & RossS. R. (2016). Ten aspects of the Big Five in the Personality Inventory for DSM–5. Personality Disorders, Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(2), 113–123, https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000170.
133.
DeYoungC. G., GraziopleneR. G., & PetersonJ. B. (2012). From madness to genius: The Openness/Intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 63–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.003
134.
DeYoungC. G., QuiltyL. C., & PetersonJ. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.93.5.880
135.
DiebelsK. J., LearyM. R., & ChonD. (2018). Individual differences in selfishness as a major dimension of personality: A reinterpretation of the sixth personality factor. Review of General Psychology, 22(4), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000155
DuckittJ., & SibleyC. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1894, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2010.00672.x.
EysenckH. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? — Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(8), 773–790, https://doi.org/10.1016/0191–8869(91)90144–Z.
EysenckH. J. (1994). The Big Five or giant three: Criteria for a paradigm. In HalversonC. F.Jr., KohnstammG. A., & MartinR. P. (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (p. 37–51). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.
142.
EysenckH. J., & EysenckS. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
143.
EysenckH. J., & WilsonG. D. (1978). The psychological basis of ideology. University Park Press: Baltimore, MD.
144.
FeherA., & VernonP. A. (2020). Looking beyond the Big Five: A selective review of alternatives to the Big Five model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 110002.
145.
FigueredoA. J., GladdenP. R., SiscoM. M., PatchE. A., & JonesD. N. (2015). The unholy trinity: The Dark Triad, sexual coercion, and Brunswik–symmetry. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 435–454
146.
FinniganK. M., & VazireS. (2018). The incremental validity of average state self–reports over global self–reports of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 321–337, https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000136.
FreudS. (1923). The ego and the id. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIX (1923–1925). London: Hogarth.
150.
FurnhamA., RichardsS. C., & PaulhusD. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review: Dark Triad of personality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216, https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018.
151.
GaltonF. (1884). Measurement of character. Fortnightly Review, 36, 179–185.
152.
GaughanE. T., MillerJ. D., & LynamD. R. (2012). Examining the utility of general models of personality in the study of psychopathy: A comparison of the HEXACO–PI–R and NEO PI–R. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 513–523, https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2012.26.4.513.
GerberA. S., HuberG. A., DohertyD., & DowlingC. M. (2011). The big five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 265–287, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev–polisci–051010–111659.
GoldbergL. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In WheelerL. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
158.
GoldbergL. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The Big–Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.59.6.1216.
159.
GoldbergL. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big–Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040–3590.4.1.26
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad–bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower–level facets of several five–factor models. In MervieldeI., DearyI., De FruytF., & OstendorfF. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, p. 7–28). Tilburg University Press: Tilburg, The Netherlands.
162.
GoldbergL. R. (2006). Doing it all bass–ackwards: The development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 347–358, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.01.001.
163.
GoldbergL. R. (2008). The Eugene–Springfield community sample. Oregon Research Institute Technical Report, 48(1). Eugene, OR; University of Oregon Research Institute.
164.
GoldbergL. R., LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2008). Comment on Anderson and Ones (2008). European Journal of Personality, 22, 151, 156, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.663
165.
GrayJ. A. (1991). The neuropsychology of temperament. In StrelauJ. & AngleitnerA. (Eds.), Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement (p. 105–128). Plenum Press: New York.
166.
GrayJ. A., & McNaughtonN. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo–hippocampal system. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
167.
GrazianoW.G., & TobinR.M. (2017). Agreeableness and the five factor model. In WidigerR.A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model, pp. 105–132. Oxford University Press, New York.
GurvenM., von RuedenC., MassenkoffM., KaplanH., & Lero VieM. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five–factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030841
HarknessA. R., ReynoldsS. M., & LilienfeldS. O. (2014). A review of systems for psychology and psychiatry: Adaptive systems, Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5), and the DSM–5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.823438
172.
HeckD. W., ThielmannI., MoshagenM., & HilbigB. E. (2018). Who lies? A large–scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making. Judgment and Decision making, 13, 356–371.
173.
HilbigB. E., MoshagenM., & ZettlerI. (2016). Prediction consistency: A test of the equivalence assumption across different indicators of the same construct. European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2085
174.
HilbigB. E., ZettlerI., LeistF., & HeydaschT. (2013). It takes two: Honesty–Humility and Agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 598–603, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.008.
175.
HodsonG., BookA., VisserB. A., VolkA. A., AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2018). Is the dark triad common factor distinct from low Honesty–Humility?Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.012
HofsteeW. K. B., De RaadB., & GoldbergL. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.63.1.146
HopwoodC.J. (2018). Interpersonal dynamics in personality and personality disorders. European Journal of Personality, 32, 499–524, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2155.
181.
HorstmannK. T., RauthmannJ. F., & ShermanR. A. (2018). The measurement of situational influences. In Zeigler–HillV. & ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: The science of personality and individual differences (pp. 465–484). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
182.
HoughL. M. (1992). The Big Five personality variables—construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139–155.
183.
HrdyS. B. (1999). Mother nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. NY, NY: Pantheon Books.
184.
HrdyS. B. (2011). Mothers and others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
185.
JacksonD. N. (1984). Personality research form manual (3rd ed.). Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
186.
JacksonJ. J., BoggT., WaltonK. E., WoodD., HarmsP. D., Lodi–SmithJ., … & RobertsB. W. (2009). Not all conscientiousness scales change alike: A multimethod, multisample study of age differences in the facets of conscientiousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 446–459, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014156.
187.
JacksonJ. J., WoodD., BoggT., WaltonK. E., HarmsP. D., & RobertsB. W. (2010). What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the behavioral indicators of conscientiousness (BIC). Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.06.005
188.
JakobwitzS., & EganV. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 331–339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006.
189.
JensenK., VaishA., & SchmidtM. F. H. (2014). The emergence of human prosociality: Aligning with others through feelings, concerns, and norms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 822. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00822
190.
JohnO. P., NaumannL. P., & SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P., RobinsR. W., & PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 3, pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
191.
JohnO. P., & SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A. & JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.
192.
JohnsonL. K., PlouffeR. A., & SaklofskeD. H. (2019). Subclinical sadism and the Dark Triad: Should there be a “Dark Tetrad”?Journal of Individual Differences, 40, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614–0001/a000284
193.
JohnsonM. K., RowattW. C., & PetriniL. (2011). A new trait on the market: Honesty–Humility as a unique predictor of job performance ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 857–862, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.011.
194.
JonesD. N., & PaulhusD. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In LearyM. R. & HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). New York: Guilford.
195.
JostJ. T., GlaserJ., KruglanskiA. W., & SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.
196.
JudgeT. A., & BonoJ. E. (2001). Relationship of core self–evaluations traits—self–esteem, generalized self–efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta–analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.86.1.80
197.
KasserT. (2013). Lucy in the mind of Lennon. New York: Oxford University Press.
198.
KotovR., GamezW., SchmidtF., & WatsonD. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768–821. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020327
199.
KotovR., KruegerR. F., WatsonD., AchenbachT. M., AlthoffR. R., BagbyR. M., … ZimmermanM. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258
200.
KruegerR. F., DerringerJ., MarkonK. E., WatsonD., & SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM–5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
201.
KruegerR. F., & MarkonK. E. (2014). The role of the DSM–5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev–clinpsy–032813–153732
202.
KruppE. C. (2003). Echoes of the ancient skies: The astronomy of lost civilizations. Courier Corporation.
203.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
204.
KuhnT. S. (1974). Second thoughts paradigms. In SuppeF., (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459–482). London: University of Illinois Press.
205.
KuncelN. R., KliegerD. M., ConnellyB. S., & OnesD. S. (2013). Mechanical versus clinical data combination in selection and admissions decisions: A meta–analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1060–1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034156
206.
KurtzJ. E., & TiegreenS. B. (2005). Matters of conscience and conscientiousness: The place of ego development in the five–factor model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 312–317, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8503_07.
207.
LaajajR., MacoursK., HernandezD. A. P., AriasO., GoslingS. D., PotterJ., … & VakisR. (2019). Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non–WEIRD populations. Science Advances, 5, eaaw5226, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw5226.
208.
LanningK. (1994). Dimensionality of observer ratings on the California Adult Q–set. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 151–160, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.67.1.151.
209.
LearyT. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
210.
LeBretonJ. M., BinningJ. F., & AdornoA. J. (2006). Subclinical psychopaths. Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology, 1, 388–411.
211.
LeeA. H., & DiGiuseppeR. (2018). Anger and aggression treatments: A review of meta–analyses. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 65–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.004.
212.
LeeK., & AshtonM. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
213.
LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the five–factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571–1582, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016.
214.
LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2006). Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. Psychological Assessment, 18, 182–191, https://doi.org/10.1037/1040–3590.18.2.182.
215.
LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001–1053, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2008.00512.x.
216.
LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2013). Prediction of self– and observer report scores on HEXACO–60 and NEO–FFI scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 668–675, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.002.
LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2019). Not much H in the Big Five aspect scales: Relations between BFAS and HEXACO–PI–R scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 164–167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.010.
219.
LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (in press). Sex differences in HEXACO personality characteristics across countries and ethnicities. Journal of Personality
220.
LeeK., AshtonM. C., De VriesR. E. (2005). Predicting workplace delinquency and integrity with the HEXACO and five–factor models of personality structure. Human Performance, 18, 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1802_4
221.
LeeK., AshtonM. C., MorrisonD. L., CorderyJ., DunlopP. D. (2008). Predicting integrity with the HEXACO personality model: Use of self– and observer reports. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 147–167. https://doi.org10.1348/096317907X195175
222.
LeeK., AshtonM. C., OgunfoworaB., BourdageJ. S., & ShinK. H. (2010). The personality bases of socio–political attitudes: The role of Honesty–Humility and Openness to Experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 115–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.007.
223.
LeeY, BerryC. M., Gonzalez–MuleE. (2019). The importance of being humble: A meta–analysis and incremental validity analysis of the relationship between honesty–humility and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104, 1535–1546. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000421
224.
LeoneL., ChirumboloA., & DesimoniM. (2012). The impact of the HEXACO personality model in predicting socio–political attitudes: The moderating role of interest in politics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 416–421, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.049.
225.
LeoneL., DesimoniM., & ChirumboloA. (2012). HEXACO, social worldviews and socio–political attitudes: A mediation analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(8), 995–1001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.016.
226.
LevineE. E., & CohenT. R. (2018). You can handle the truth: Mispredicting the consequences of honest communication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(9), 1400–1429. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000488
Lorenzo–SevaU. & ten BergeJ.M.F. (2006). Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2, 57–64, https://doi.org/10.1027/1614–2241.2.2.57.
231.
LudekeS., BainbridgeT., LiuJ., ZhaoK., SmillieL. D., & ZettlerI. (2019). Using the Big Five aspect scales to translate between the HEXACO and Big Five personality models. Journal of Personality, 87, 1025–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12453
232.
LukaszewskiA. W. (in press). Evolutionary perspectives on the mechanistic underpinnings of personality. In RauthmannJ. F. (Ed.), The handbook of personality dynamics and processes. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Press.
233.
LykkenD. T. (1971). Multiple factor analysis and personality research. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 161–170.
234.
LynamD. R., & MillerJ. D. (2019). The basic trait of Antagonism: An unfortunately underappreciated construct. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 118–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.05.012.
MaplesJ. L., GuanL., CarterN. T., & MillerJ. D. (2014). A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120–item IPIP–based measure of the five–factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26, 1070–1084, https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000004.
237.
MarcusB., LeeK., & AshtonM. C. (2007). Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big Five, or one in addition?Personnel Psychology, 60, 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744–6570.2007.00063.x.
MarkonK. E., KruegerR. F., & WatsonD. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.88.1.139
240.
MarshH. W., LüdtkeO., MuthénB., AsparouhovT., MorinA., TrautweinU., & NagengastB. (2010). A new look at the Big Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019227.
241.
MarshallJ., WattsA. L., & LilienfeldS. O. (2018). Do psychopathic individuals possess a misaligned moral compass? A meta–analytic examination of psychopathy's relations with moral judgment. Personality Disorders, Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 40–50, https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000226.
242.
MaynardC. (2019, April). Take us off your pedestal: Normalizing unspecified kidney donation. ELPAT Conference, Krakow, Poland.
243.
McAbeeS. T., & OswaldF. L. (2013). The criterion–related validity of personality measures for predicting GPA: A meta–analytic validity competition. Psychological Assessment, 25, 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031748
McCraeR. R. (1990). Traits and trait names: How well is Openness represented in natural languages?European Journal of Personality, 4, 119–129, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410040205.
McCraeR. R. (2015). A more nuanced view of reliability: Specificity in the trait hierarchy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314541857
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T.Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five–factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
252.
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T.Jr. (2008). The five–factor theory of personality. In JohnO. P., RobinsR. W., & PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (p. 159–181). The Guilford Press: New York.
253.
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T.Jr. (2010). NEO inventories professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
254.
McCraeR. R., CostaP. T.Jr., & MartinT. A. (2005). The NEO–PI–3: A more readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05
McCraeR. R., & SutinA. R. (2018). A five–factor theory perspective on causal analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32, 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2134
257.
MeđedovićJ., ČolovićP., DinićB. M., & SmederevacS. (2019). The HEXACO personality inventory: Validation and psychometric properties in the Serbian language. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101, 25–31, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1370426.
258.
MeđedovićJ., & PetrovićB. (2015). The Dark Tetrad: Structural properties and location in the personality space. Journal of Individual Differences, 36, 228–236, https://doi.org/10.1027/1614–0001/a000179
259.
MeereM., & EganV. (2017). Everyday sadism, the Dark Triad, personality, and disgust sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 157–161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.056.
260.
MercadoB. K., DilchertS., GiordanoC., & OnesD. S. (2018). Counterproductive work behaviors. In OnesD. S., AndersonN., ViswesvaranC., & SinangilH. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology – Volume 1: Personnel psychology and employee performance (pp. 109–211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
261.
MertonR.K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 3810, 56–63.
262.
MillerJ. D., GaughanE. T., MaplesJ., & PriceJ. (2011). A comparison of agreeableness scores from the Big Five Inventory and the NEO PI–R: Consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy. Assessment, 18, 335–339, https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111411671.
263.
MilojevP., & SibleyC. G. (2017). Normative personality trait development in adulthood: A 6–year cohort–sequential growth model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 510–526, https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000121.
264.
MolenaarP. C., & CampbellC. G. (2009). The new person–specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 112–117, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–8721.2009.01619.x.
265.
MondakJ. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY.
266.
MoreyL.C., GoodE.W., & HopwoodC.J. (2020). Maladaptive personality traits reflect the joint contribution of global personality dysfunction and normal traits.
267.
MorinA. J. S., ArensA. K., & MarshH. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct–relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.961800.
268.
MorseL., & CohenT. R. (2020). Breaking the silence in auditing: Characteristics of ethical accountants. Manuscript submitted for publication.
269.
MoshagenM., ThielmannI., HilbigB. E., & ZettlerI. (2019). Meta–analytic investigations of the HEXACO Personality Inventory(–Revised): Reliability generalization, self–observer agreement, intercorrelations, and relations to demographic variables. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(3), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151–2604/a000377
270.
MõttusR., BatesT. C., CondonD. C., MroczekD. K., & RevelleW. R. (2017). Leveraging a more nuanced view of personality: Narrow characteristics predict and explain variance in life outcomes. PsyArXiv.https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4q9gv
271.
MõttusR., KandlerC., BleidornW., RiemannR., & McCraeR. R. (2017). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000100
272.
MõttusR., SinickJ., TerraccianoA., HřebíčkováM., KandlerC., … & JangK. L. (2019). Personality characteristics below facets: A replication and meta–analysis of cross–rater agreement, rank–order stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000202, e35, e50
273.
MulderR. T., HorwoodJ., TyrerP., CarterJ, & JoyceP. R. (2016). Validating the proposed ICD–11 domains. Personality and Mental Health, 10, 84–95, https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1336.
274.
MurrayH. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
275.
Naragon–GaineyK., & WatsonD. (2014). Consensually–defined facets of personality as prospective predictors of change in depression symptoms. Assessment, 21, 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114528030
276.
National Council on Measurement in Education, American Psychological Association, & American Educational Research Association. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing (2014 Edition). American Educational Research Association.
277.
NormanW. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040291.
278.
O'BoyleE. H., ForsythD. R., BanksG. C., StoryP. A., & WhiteC. D. (2015). A meta–analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the Dark Triad and five–factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83, 644–664, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12126.
279.
OltmannsJ. R., & WidigerT. A. (2016). Self–pathology, the five–factor model, and bloated specific factors: A cautionary tale. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 423–434, https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000144.
280.
OltmannsJ. R., & WidigerT. A. (2018). Maladaptive variants of adaptive traits and bloated specific factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 76, 177–185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.08.006.
281.
OnesD. S. (1993). The construct of integrity tests (unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Iowa, IA.
OnesD. S., & ViswesvaranC. (2001). Integrity tests and other criterion–focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1–2), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468–2389.00161
284.
OnesD. S., ViswesvaranC., & SchmidtF. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta–analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology [Monograph], 78, 679–703, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.78.4.679.
285.
OnesD. S., ViswesvaranC., & SchmidtF. L. (2012). Integrity tests predict counterproductive work behaviors and job performance well: A comment on Van Iddekinge et al. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 537, 542, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024825
286.
OnesD. S., WiernikB. M., WilmotM. P., & KostalJ. W. (2016). Conceptual and methodological complexity of narrow trait measures in personality–outcome research: Better knowledge by partitioning variance from multiple latent traits and measurement artifacts. European Journal of Personality, 30(4), 319–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2060
287.
OstendorfF. (1990). Sprache und Persoenlichkeitsstruktur. Zur Validitaet des Fuenf–Faktoren–Modells der Persoenlichkeit [Language and personality structure. On the validity of the five factor model of personality]. Regensburg: Roderer.
PaceV. L., & BrannickM. T. (2010). How similar are personality scales of the “same” construct? A meta–analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.014
291.
ParkH. (Hailey), WiernikB. M., OhI.–S., Gonzalez–MuléE., OnesD. S., & LeeY. (2020). Meta–analytic five–factor model personality intercorrelations: Eeny, meeny, miney, moe, how, which, why, and where to go. Journal of Applied Psychologyhttps://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000476
292.
ParkerJ. D., & EndlerN. S. (1992). Coping with coping assessment: A critical review. European Journal of Personality, 6, 321–344, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410060502.
293.
PaulhusD. L. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 421–426, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414547737.
294.
PaulhusD. L. , BuckelsE. E., TrapnellP. D., & JonesD. N. (2020). Screening for dark personalities: The Short Dark Tetrad (SD4). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, in press.
295.
PaulhusD. L., & WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092–6566(02)00505–6.
PletzerJ. L., BentvelzenM., OostromJ. K., & De VriesR. E. (2019). A meta–analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.04.004
298.
PoldrackR. A. (2010). Mapping mental function to brain structure: How can cognitive neuroimaging succeed?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 753–761, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388777.
299.
PonterottoJ. (2020). A psychobiography of John F. Kennedy Jr. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
300.
ProvenzanoD.A., DaneA.V., FarrellA.H., MariniZ. A., & VolkA. A. (2018). Do bullies have more sex? The role of personality. Evolutionary Psychological Science4, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806–017–0126–4
301.
RazaviP., Shaban–AzadH., & SrivastavaS. (2019, February). Emotional reactions to violations of honor: A multi–method investigation of Gheirat in Iran. Poster presented at the Advances in Cultural Psychology preconference of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology in Portland, OR. Link: http://bit.ly/SPSP2019_PR
RevelleW., CondonD. M., WiltJ., FrenchJ. A., BrownA., & EllemanL. G. (2017). Web– and phone–based data collection using planned missing designs. In FieldingN. G., LeeR. M., & BlankG., The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 578–594). London, U.K.: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992.n33
304.
RevelleW., DworakE. M., & CondonD. M. (2020). Exploring the persome: The power of the item in understanding personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 109905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109905
305.
RevelleW., & WiltJ. A. (2019). The dynamics of personality (in press). In RauthmanJ., FunderD., & ShermanR. A. (Eds.), The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (chap. 1). Elsevier: San Diego, CA.
306.
ReynoldsS. K., & ClarkL. A. (2001). Predicting dimensions of personality disorder from domains and facets of the five factor model. Journal of Personality, 69, 199–222, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–6494.00142.
307.
RhemtullaM., van BorkR., & BorsboomD. (2019). Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models. Psychological Methods, 25, 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000220
308.
RobertsB. W., LuoJ., BrileyD. A., ChowP. I., SuR., & HillP. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 117–141, https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000088.
309.
RobertsB. W., WaltonK. E., & ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean–level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta–analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.132.1.1.
310.
RugglesC. L. (2005). Ancient astronomy: An encyclopedia of cosmologies and myth. Abc–Clio.
311.
RushtonJ. P., & IrwingP. (2008). A general factor of personality (GFP) from two meta–analyses of the Big Five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds (2005). Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 679–683, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.015.
312.
SamuelD. B., & WidigerT. A. (2008). A meta–analytic review of the relationships between the five–factor model and DSM–IV–TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002.
313.
SarafisP., TsounisA., MalliarouM., & LahanaE. (2014). Disclosing the truth: A dilemma between instilling hope and respecting patient autonomy in everyday clinical practice. Global Journal of Health Science, 6(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n1p128
314.
SaucierG. (1992). Openness versus intellect: Much ado about nothing?. European Journal of Personality, 6, 381–386, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410060506.
315.
SaucierG. (2002). Gone too far––or not far enough? Comments on the article by Ashton and Lee (2001). European Journal of Personality, 16, 55–62, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.432.
316.
SaucierG. (2009). Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: Indications for a Big Six structure. Journal of Personality, 77, 1577–1614, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2009.00593.x.
317.
SaucierG. (2019). On the curious history of the big six: Variable selection and ‘moral exclusion’ in the formation of fundamental personality models. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(3), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151–2604/a000375
318.
SaucierG., & IurinoK. (in press). High–dimensionality personality structure in the natural language: Further analyses of classic sets of English–language trait–adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychologyhttps://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000273
319.
SaucierG., IurinoK., & ThalmayerA. G. (2020). Comparing predictive validity in a community sample: High–dimensionality and traditional domain–and–facet structures of personality variation. European Journal of Personalityhttps://doi.org/10.1002/per.2235
320.
SaucierG., & OstendorfF. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the big five personality factors: A cross–language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 613–627, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.76.4.613.
321.
SaucierG., & SrivastavaS. (2015). What makes a good structural model of personality? Evaluating the Big Five and alternatives. In MikulincerM., ShaverP. R., CooperL. & LarsenR. (Eds.), Handbook of social and personality psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 283–305). Washington, DC: APA.
322.
SaucierG., ThalmayerA. G., PayneD. L., CarlsonR., SanogoL., Ole–KotikashL., ChurchA. T., KatigbakM. S., SomerO., SzarotaP., SzirmakZ., & ZhouX. (2014). A basic bivariate structure of personality attributes evident across nine languages. Journal of Personality, 82, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12028
SchwabaT., RhemtullaM., HopwoodC. J., & BleidornW. (2020). The facet atlas: Using network analysis to describe the blends, cores, and peripheries of personality structure.
325.
SchwabaT., RobinsR. W., GrijalvaE., & BleidornW. (2019). Does openness to experience matter in love and work? Domain, facet, and developmental evidence from a 24–year longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 87, 1074–1092, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12458.
326.
ShadishW. R., CookT. D., & CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi–experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
327.
SheehanD.V. (2014). The mini–international neuropsychiatric interview, version 7.0 for DSM–5 (M.I.N.I 7.0). Jacksonville, FL: Medical Outcomes Systems
328.
ShermerM. (2001). The borderlands of science: Where sense meets nonsense. New York: Oxford University Press.
329.
SibleyC. G., OsborneD., & DuckittJ. (2012). Personality and political orientation: Meta–analysis and test of a Threat–Constraint Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 664–677, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.002.
330.
SibleyC. G., & PirieD. J. (2013). Personality in New Zealand: Scale norms and demographic differences in the Mini–IPIP6. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 42, 13–30.
SotoC. J. (2019a). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831612.
334.
SotoC. J. [cjsotomatic]. (2019b, January 20). Undecided. Thoughts so far: 1. H is a misnomer, because the factor is almost entirely defined by antisocial rather than prosocial content. [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/cjsotomatic/status/1087035467856576512
335.
SotoC. J. [cjsotomatic]. (2019c, April 29). 1/n. Hey personality nerds! Jaap Denissen, Oliver John, and I tried to develop a supplemental Honesty–Humility (H) scale for the Big Five Inventory–2 (BFI–2). We failed. Probably won't write a paper, so here's a THREAD with findings and conclusions, in case you're interested. [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/cjsotomatic/status/1122942396482957312
336.
SotoC. J., & JohnO. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI–2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
337.
SotoC. J., & TackettJ. L. (2015). Personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Structure, development, and outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 358–362, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415589345.
338.
SoutterA. R. B., BatesT. C., & MõttusR. (in press). Big Five and HEXACO personality traits, proenvironmental attitudes, and behaviors: A meta–analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
339.
SpirrisonC. L. (1994). Factorial hue and cry: Comments on Jane Levinger's “Has Psychology Lost Its conscience?”Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 579–583, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_13.
340.
SrivastavaS. (2010). The five–factor model describes the structure of social perceptions. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 69–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/10478401003648815.
341.
StanekK. C., & OnesD. S. (2018). Taxonomies and compendia of cognitive ability and personality constructs and measures relevant to industrial, work and organizational psychology. In OnesD. S., AndersonN., ViswesvaranC., & SinangilH. K. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (2nd Ed) (pp 367–407). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
342.
StanekK. C., OnesD. S., & McGueM. (2017). Counterproductive behaviors: Relations across life domains, etiology, and implications for applied practice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12164
343.
StrusW., CieciuchJ., & RowińskiT. (2014). Circumplex structure of personality traits measured with the IPIP–45AB5C questionnaire in Poland. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.018
344.
SzarotaP., AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2007). Taxonomy and structure of the Polish personality lexicon. European Journal of Personality, 21, 823–852, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.635.
345.
SzirmakZ., & De RaadB. (1994). Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 8, 95–117, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080203.
346.
TackettJ. L., KruegerR. F., IaconoW. G., & McGueM. (2008). Personality in middle childhood: A hierarchical structure and longitudinal connections with personality in late adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1456–1462, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.005.
347.
TaylorS. E., KleinL. C., LewisB. P., GruenewaldT. L., GurungR. A. R., & UpdegraffJ. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend–and–befriend, not fight–or–flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411–429, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–295X.107.3.411.
348.
TellegenA. (1993). Folk concepts and psychological concepts of personality and personality disorder. Psychological Inquiry, 4(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0402_12
349.
TellegenA., GroveW. M., & WallerN. G. (1991). Inventory of personal characteristics #7 (IPC– 7). Unpublished materials, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
ThalmayerA. G., & SaucierG. (2014). The questionnaire Big Six in 26 nations: Developing cross–culturally applicable Big Six, Big Five and Big Two inventories. European Journal of Personality, 28, 482–496, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1969.
352.
ThalmayerA. G., SaucierG., & EigenhuisA. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium–length Big Five and Big Six personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23, 995–1009. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024165
353.
ThalmayerA. G., SaucierG., Ole–KotikashL., & PayneD. (2019). Personality structure in east and west Africa: Lexical studies of personality in Maa and Supyire–Senufo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000264
354.
ThielmannI., & De VriesR. E. (2020). Who wants to change and how? A self–relevance account of personality change goals. Manuscript submitted for publication.
355.
ThielmannI., & HilbigB. E. (2019). Nomological consistency: A comprehensive test of the equivalence of different trait indicators for the same constructs. Journal of Personality, 87(3), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12428
356.
ThielmannI., SpadaroG., & BallietD. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217
357.
TomaselloM. (2019). Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
358.
TriversR. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57, https://doi.org/10.1086/406755.
UnderwoodB. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076759
361.
van der LindenD., PekaarK. A., BakkerA. B., SchermerJ. A., VernonP. A., DunkelC. S., & PetridesK. V. (2017). Overlap between the general factor of personality and emotional intelligence: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000078
362.
Van DoesumN. J., De VriesR. E., BloklandA. A., HillJ. M., KuhlmanD. M., StiversA. W., … & Van LangeP. A. (2020). Social mindfulness: Prosocial the active way. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15, 183–193, https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1579352.
363.
Van HielA., KossowskaM., & MervieldeI. (2000). The relationship between openness to experience and political ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(4), 741–751, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191–8869(99)00135–X.
364.
Van IddekingeC. H., RothP. L., RaymarkP. H., & Odle–DusseauH. N. (2012). The criterion–related validity of integrity tests: An updated meta–analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 499–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021196
365.
Van OurtiT., & ClarkeP. (2011). A simple correction to remove the bias of the Gini coefficient due to grouping. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 982–994. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00103
366.
VazireS., & CarlsonE. N. (2010). Self–knowledge of personality: Do people know themselves?Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17519004.2010.00280.x
367.
ViswesvaranC., & OnesD. S. (2000). Measurement error in “Big Five factors” personality assessment: Reliability generalization across studies and measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970475
368.
ViswesvaranC., & OnesD. S. (2016). Integrity tests: A review of alternate conceptualizations and some measurement and practical issues. In KumarU. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of personality assessment (pp. 59–73). Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
369.
VizeC. E., CollisonK. L., MillerJ. D., & LynamD. R. (2020). The “core” of the dark triad: A test of competing hypotheses. Personality Disorders, Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11, 91–99, https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000386.
370.
von StummS., HellB., & Chamorro–PremuzicT. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611421204
371.
WallerN. G., DeYoungC. G., & BouchardT. J. (2016). The recaptured scale technique: A method for testing the structural robustness of personality scales. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 433–445, https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1157753.
372.
WatsonD., & ClarkL. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.96.3.465.
373.
WatsonD., & Naragon–GaineyK. (2014). Personality, emotions, and the emotional disorders. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 422–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614536162
374.
WatsonD., NusE., & WuK. D. (2019). Development and validation of the faceted inventory of the five–factor model (FI–FFM). Assessment, 26, 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117711022
375.
WatsonD., StasikS. M., Ellickson–LarewS., & StantonK. (2015a). Explicating the psychopathological correlates of anomalous sleep experiences. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000038
376.
WatsonD., StasikS. M., Ellickson–LarewS., & StantonK. (2015b). Extraversion and psychopathology: A facet–level analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 432–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000051
377.
WestfallJ., & YarkoniT. (2016). Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0152719, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152719.
378.
WidigerT. A. (2017). A five factor discussion. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of the five–factor model (pp. 539–573). NY: Oxford University Press.
379.
WidigerT. A., & CregoC. (2019). HiTOP thought disorder, DSM–5 psychoticism, and five factor model openness. Journal of Research in Personality, 80, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.04.008
380.
WidigerT. A., SellbomM., ChmielewskiM., ClarkL. A., DeYoungC. G., KotovR., KruegerR. F., LynamD. R., MillerJ. D., Mullins–SweattS., SamuelD. B., SouthS. C., TackettJ. L., ThomasK. M., WatsonD., & WrightA. G. C. (2019). Personality in a hierarchical model of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618797105
381.
WiernikB. (2016) The nomological network of classic and contemporary career preferences (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Retrieved from https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/202184
382.
WigginsJ. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
383.
WilmotM. (2017). Personality and its impacts across the behavioral sciences: A quantitative review of meta–analytic findings (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
384.
WiltJ., & RevelleW. (2015). Affect, behaviour, cognition and desire in the Big Five: An analysis of item content and structure. European Journal of Personality, 29(4), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2002
385.
WiltJ., & RevelleW. (2019). The Big Five, everyday contexts and activities, and affective experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 136(1), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.032
386.
WiltshireJ., BourdageJ. S., & LeeK. (2014). Honesty–humility and perceptions of organizational politics in predicting workplace outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 235–251, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869–013–9310–0.
387.
WooS. E., ChernyshenkoO. S., StarkS. E., & ConzG. (2014). Validity of six Openness facets in predicting work behaviors: A meta–analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.806329
388.
WoodD., GardnerM. H., & HarmsP. D. (2015). How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review, 122(1), 84–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038423
389.
World Health Organization. (2019). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics; 11th revision [Online]. Retrieved 19 March 2020, from https://icd.who.int/browse11/l–m/en
390.
WranghamR. W. (2018). Two types of aggression in human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713611115
391.
WrightJ. C., NadelhofferT., Thomson RossL., & Sinnott–ArmstrongW. (2018). Be it ever so humble: Proposing a dual–dimension account and measurement of humility. Self and Identity, 17(1), 92–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1327454
392.
YarkoniT. (2015). Neurobiological substrates of personality: A critical overview. In MikulincerM., ShaverP. R., CooperM. L., & LarsenR. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vols. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 61–83). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14343–003
393.
ZettlerI., ThielmannI., HilbigB. E., & MoshagenM. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large–scale meta–analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760.
394.
ZhaoK., FergusonE., & SmillieL. D. (2017a). Individual differences in good manners rather than compassion predict fair allocations of wealth in the dictator game. Journal of Personality, 85(2), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12237
395.
ZhaoK., FergusonE., & SmillieL. D. (2017b). When fair is not equal: Compassion and politeness predict allocations of wealth under different norms of equity and need. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8 (8), 847–857. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616683018
396.
ZychI., TtofiM. M., & FarringtonD. P. (2019). Empathy and callous–unemotional traits in different bullying roles: A systematic review and meta–analysis. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 20(1), 3–21, https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016683456.